PROFHER对美国肱骨近端骨折治疗趋势的影响。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
J Sam Cheesman, Calvin H Englert, Qian Yang, Jung U Yoo, Omar F Nazir, Adam J Mirarchi
{"title":"PROFHER对美国肱骨近端骨折治疗趋势的影响。","authors":"J Sam Cheesman, Calvin H Englert, Qian Yang, Jung U Yoo, Omar F Nazir, Adam J Mirarchi","doi":"10.1177/17585732251359178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (PROFHER) was a randomized control trial (RCT) published in 2015 comparing outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), finding no difference in Oxford Shoulder Scores between operative and nonoperative groups at 2 and 5 years. This study investigated changes in PHF treatment patterns by American orthopedic surgeons after the publication of PROFHER in 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PearlDiver database, patients aged 16 years or older with closed PHFs without associated dislocation or pathologic fracture etiology between 2011 and 2019 were identified. Patients who underwent operative treatment, including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and hemiarthroplasty, were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression and piecewise linear regression to assess changes in rates of surgical management of PHFs starting in 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simple linear regression analysis showed increases in total operative treatment, with increased rates of ORIF and TSA; hemiarthroplasty rates decreased. Piecewise linear regression showed no significant change in the rate of treatment per year after 2015 for total operative treatment, ORIF, or TSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROFHER did not significantly impact rates of operative treatments for PHFs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III; Retrospective Case-Control Design Using Large Database; Prognosis Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251359178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of PROFHER on trends in proximal humerus fracture treatment in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"J Sam Cheesman, Calvin H Englert, Qian Yang, Jung U Yoo, Omar F Nazir, Adam J Mirarchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251359178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (PROFHER) was a randomized control trial (RCT) published in 2015 comparing outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), finding no difference in Oxford Shoulder Scores between operative and nonoperative groups at 2 and 5 years. This study investigated changes in PHF treatment patterns by American orthopedic surgeons after the publication of PROFHER in 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PearlDiver database, patients aged 16 years or older with closed PHFs without associated dislocation or pathologic fracture etiology between 2011 and 2019 were identified. Patients who underwent operative treatment, including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and hemiarthroplasty, were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression and piecewise linear regression to assess changes in rates of surgical management of PHFs starting in 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simple linear regression analysis showed increases in total operative treatment, with increased rates of ORIF and TSA; hemiarthroplasty rates decreased. Piecewise linear regression showed no significant change in the rate of treatment per year after 2015 for total operative treatment, ORIF, or TSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PROFHER did not significantly impact rates of operative treatments for PHFs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III; Retrospective Case-Control Design Using Large Database; Prognosis Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251359178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251359178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251359178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肱骨近端骨折随机评价(PROFHER)是2015年发表的一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折(phf)的结果,发现手术组和非手术组在2年和5年的牛津肩评分没有差异。本研究调查了2015年PROFHER出版后美国骨科医生PHF治疗模式的变化。方法:使用PearlDiver数据库,对2011年至2019年期间16岁及以上无相关脱位或病理性骨折病因的闭合性phf患者进行识别。接受手术治疗的患者,包括切开复位内固定(ORIF)、全肩关节置换术(TSA)和半肩关节置换术,通过现行程序术语(CPT)代码进行识别。采用简单线性回归和分段线性回归对数据进行分析,以评估2015年以来phf手术治疗率的变化。结果:简单线性回归分析显示,手术总治疗次数增加,ORIF和TSA发生率增加;半关节置换术发生率下降。分段线性回归显示,2015年后总手术治疗、ORIF或TSA的年治疗率无显著变化。结论:在美国,PROFHER对phf的手术治疗率没有显著影响。证据等级:三级;大型数据库回顾性病例对照设计预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of PROFHER on trends in proximal humerus fracture treatment in the United States.

Background: PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (PROFHER) was a randomized control trial (RCT) published in 2015 comparing outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), finding no difference in Oxford Shoulder Scores between operative and nonoperative groups at 2 and 5 years. This study investigated changes in PHF treatment patterns by American orthopedic surgeons after the publication of PROFHER in 2015.

Methods: Using the PearlDiver database, patients aged 16 years or older with closed PHFs without associated dislocation or pathologic fracture etiology between 2011 and 2019 were identified. Patients who underwent operative treatment, including open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and hemiarthroplasty, were identified via current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression and piecewise linear regression to assess changes in rates of surgical management of PHFs starting in 2015.

Results: Simple linear regression analysis showed increases in total operative treatment, with increased rates of ORIF and TSA; hemiarthroplasty rates decreased. Piecewise linear regression showed no significant change in the rate of treatment per year after 2015 for total operative treatment, ORIF, or TSA.

Conclusions: PROFHER did not significantly impact rates of operative treatments for PHFs in the United States.

Level of evidence: Level III; Retrospective Case-Control Design Using Large Database; Prognosis Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信