“在墙上”:美国救护车病人下车时间的描述性分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Matthew R Shaw, Eric Quinn, Jack Cheng, Sabina Pilipovic, Ali Treichel, Remle P Crowe, Jeffrey L Jarvis
{"title":"“在墙上”:美国救护车病人下车时间的描述性分析。","authors":"Matthew R Shaw, Eric Quinn, Jack Cheng, Sabina Pilipovic, Ali Treichel, Remle P Crowe, Jeffrey L Jarvis","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2535576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prolonged Ambulance Patient Offload Times (APOT) can lead to decreased ambulance availability and delays for subsequent patients but there is no standardized definition for this interval. We aimed to describe various APOT definitions and compare prolonged APOT intervals by agency characteristics in a large national dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2024 ESO Research Collaborative dataset, including all 9-1-1 response transports. We calculated median APOT intervals using the difference between the \"Arrival at Hospital\" timestamp and \"Receiving Facility Signature\" (APOT 1), \"Transfer of Care\" (APOT 2), \"Incident Closed\" (APOT 3), and a \"Composite\" interval (APOT 4) using the \"Receiving Facility Signature\" timestamp where available and \"Transfer of Care\" timestamp where not available. Using the composite APOT interval, we described characteristics among agencies with >100 annual transports with ≥25% of transports with prolonged APOTs compared to agencies with <25%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,237,606 included records, calculable intervals were available for 1,691,745 for APOT 1; 5,613,315 for APOT 2; 7,235,713 for APOT 3; and 6,025,643 for APOT 4. Median and interquartile (IQR) time in minutes for APOT 1 was 10.9 (6.6, 17.5), APOT 2 was 6.6 (4.4, 13.1), APOT 3 was 19.7 (13.1, 30.6), and APOT 4 was 8.7 (4.4, 15.3). Among agencies with ≥100 annual transports (2,020), 3.3% (67) had ≥25% transports with a prolonged APOT of more than 30 minutes. These agencies were more urban (79.1% vs 58.9%) and had a higher median annual 9-1-1 call volume of 2,772 (IQR:1,145, 5,978) compared to agencies where <25% of transports had a prolonged APOT (1,817 (IQR:719, 4,473)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, median APOT intervals were short, independent of the definition. A small number of EMS agencies experienced prolonged offload times for at least 1-in-4 transports, indicating that though not widespread nationally, APOT challenges are prevalent in a subset of EMS systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"On the Wall\\\": A Descriptive Analysis of Ambulance Patient Offload Times in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R Shaw, Eric Quinn, Jack Cheng, Sabina Pilipovic, Ali Treichel, Remle P Crowe, Jeffrey L Jarvis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2535576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prolonged Ambulance Patient Offload Times (APOT) can lead to decreased ambulance availability and delays for subsequent patients but there is no standardized definition for this interval. We aimed to describe various APOT definitions and compare prolonged APOT intervals by agency characteristics in a large national dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2024 ESO Research Collaborative dataset, including all 9-1-1 response transports. We calculated median APOT intervals using the difference between the \\\"Arrival at Hospital\\\" timestamp and \\\"Receiving Facility Signature\\\" (APOT 1), \\\"Transfer of Care\\\" (APOT 2), \\\"Incident Closed\\\" (APOT 3), and a \\\"Composite\\\" interval (APOT 4) using the \\\"Receiving Facility Signature\\\" timestamp where available and \\\"Transfer of Care\\\" timestamp where not available. Using the composite APOT interval, we described characteristics among agencies with >100 annual transports with ≥25% of transports with prolonged APOTs compared to agencies with <25%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,237,606 included records, calculable intervals were available for 1,691,745 for APOT 1; 5,613,315 for APOT 2; 7,235,713 for APOT 3; and 6,025,643 for APOT 4. Median and interquartile (IQR) time in minutes for APOT 1 was 10.9 (6.6, 17.5), APOT 2 was 6.6 (4.4, 13.1), APOT 3 was 19.7 (13.1, 30.6), and APOT 4 was 8.7 (4.4, 15.3). Among agencies with ≥100 annual transports (2,020), 3.3% (67) had ≥25% transports with a prolonged APOT of more than 30 minutes. These agencies were more urban (79.1% vs 58.9%) and had a higher median annual 9-1-1 call volume of 2,772 (IQR:1,145, 5,978) compared to agencies where <25% of transports had a prolonged APOT (1,817 (IQR:719, 4,473)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, median APOT intervals were short, independent of the definition. A small number of EMS agencies experienced prolonged offload times for at least 1-in-4 transports, indicating that though not widespread nationally, APOT challenges are prevalent in a subset of EMS systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2535576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2535576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:延长救护车病人卸载时间(APOT)会导致救护车可用性降低和后续病人的延误,但这一间隔没有标准化的定义。我们的目的是描述各种APOT定义,并通过大型国家数据集中的机构特征比较延长的APOT间隔。方法:对2024年ESO研究合作数据集进行回顾性分析,包括所有911响应传输。我们使用“到达医院”时间戳与“接收机构签名”(APOT 1)、“护理转移”(APOT 2)、“事件结束”(APOT 3)之间的差异,以及使用“接收机构签名”时间戳(可用)和“护理转移”时间戳(不可用)的“复合”时间间隔(APOT 4)来计算APOT间隔的中位数。使用复合APOT间隔,我们描述了年运输量为bbb100的机构的特征,与APOT延长的运输≥25%的机构相比,结果:在纳入的7,237,606份记录中,1,691,745份APOT 1的可计算间隔;APOT 2为5,613,315;APOT 3为7,235,713;APOT 4为6,025,643。APOT 1的中位和四分位数(IQR)时间为10.9 (6.6,17.5),APOT 2为6.6 (4.4,13.1),APOT 3为19.7 (13.1,30.6),APOT 4为8.7(4.4,15.3)。在年运输≥100次的机构(2020家)中,3.3%(67家)的运输时间≥25%,APOT时间延长超过30分钟。这些机构更城市化(79.1%对58.9%),与其他机构相比,这些机构的年9-1-1呼叫量中位数更高,为2,772 (IQR:1,145, 5,978)。结论:总体而言,APOT间隔中位数较短,独立于定义。少数EMS机构至少有四分之一的运输经历了长时间的卸载时间,这表明尽管在全国范围内并不普遍,但APOT挑战在EMS系统的一个子集中普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"On the Wall": A Descriptive Analysis of Ambulance Patient Offload Times in the United States.

Objectives: Prolonged Ambulance Patient Offload Times (APOT) can lead to decreased ambulance availability and delays for subsequent patients but there is no standardized definition for this interval. We aimed to describe various APOT definitions and compare prolonged APOT intervals by agency characteristics in a large national dataset.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2024 ESO Research Collaborative dataset, including all 9-1-1 response transports. We calculated median APOT intervals using the difference between the "Arrival at Hospital" timestamp and "Receiving Facility Signature" (APOT 1), "Transfer of Care" (APOT 2), "Incident Closed" (APOT 3), and a "Composite" interval (APOT 4) using the "Receiving Facility Signature" timestamp where available and "Transfer of Care" timestamp where not available. Using the composite APOT interval, we described characteristics among agencies with >100 annual transports with ≥25% of transports with prolonged APOTs compared to agencies with <25%.

Results: Of the 7,237,606 included records, calculable intervals were available for 1,691,745 for APOT 1; 5,613,315 for APOT 2; 7,235,713 for APOT 3; and 6,025,643 for APOT 4. Median and interquartile (IQR) time in minutes for APOT 1 was 10.9 (6.6, 17.5), APOT 2 was 6.6 (4.4, 13.1), APOT 3 was 19.7 (13.1, 30.6), and APOT 4 was 8.7 (4.4, 15.3). Among agencies with ≥100 annual transports (2,020), 3.3% (67) had ≥25% transports with a prolonged APOT of more than 30 minutes. These agencies were more urban (79.1% vs 58.9%) and had a higher median annual 9-1-1 call volume of 2,772 (IQR:1,145, 5,978) compared to agencies where <25% of transports had a prolonged APOT (1,817 (IQR:719, 4,473)).

Conclusions: Overall, median APOT intervals were short, independent of the definition. A small number of EMS agencies experienced prolonged offload times for at least 1-in-4 transports, indicating that though not widespread nationally, APOT challenges are prevalent in a subset of EMS systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信