促进欧洲的健康公平:探索、调整、实施和评估(ETIE)——药物流行病学研究的多样性和公平性框架。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe, Sieta T de Vries, Daniel La Parra-Casado, Helga Gardarsdottir, Maria Luisa Faquetti, Irene van Valkengoed, Elodie Aubrun, Antonios Douros, Sandra Guedes, Adrian Martinez-De La Torre, Jakob Wested, Taichi Ochi, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Carole Clair, Isha Mehta, Fidelia Ida, Montse Soriano Gabarró, Oleksii Korzh, María Martínez-González, Ariadna Maso, Diana Clamote Rodrigues, Jackie R Ndem-Galbert, Marta Korjagina, Swarnali Goswami, Daniela C Moga, Andrea Fleisch Marcus, Hedvig Nordeng
{"title":"促进欧洲的健康公平:探索、调整、实施和评估(ETIE)——药物流行病学研究的多样性和公平性框架。","authors":"Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe, Sieta T de Vries, Daniel La Parra-Casado, Helga Gardarsdottir, Maria Luisa Faquetti, Irene van Valkengoed, Elodie Aubrun, Antonios Douros, Sandra Guedes, Adrian Martinez-De La Torre, Jakob Wested, Taichi Ochi, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Carole Clair, Isha Mehta, Fidelia Ida, Montse Soriano Gabarró, Oleksii Korzh, María Martínez-González, Ariadna Maso, Diana Clamote Rodrigues, Jackie R Ndem-Galbert, Marta Korjagina, Swarnali Goswami, Daniela C Moga, Andrea Fleisch Marcus, Hedvig Nordeng","doi":"10.1002/pds.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 7","pages":"e70175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Health Equity in Europe: Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE)-A Framework of Diversity and Fairness in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.\",\"authors\":\"Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe, Sieta T de Vries, Daniel La Parra-Casado, Helga Gardarsdottir, Maria Luisa Faquetti, Irene van Valkengoed, Elodie Aubrun, Antonios Douros, Sandra Guedes, Adrian Martinez-De La Torre, Jakob Wested, Taichi Ochi, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Carole Clair, Isha Mehta, Fidelia Ida, Montse Soriano Gabarró, Oleksii Korzh, María Martínez-González, Ariadna Maso, Diana Clamote Rodrigues, Jackie R Ndem-Galbert, Marta Korjagina, Swarnali Goswami, Daniela C Moga, Andrea Fleisch Marcus, Hedvig Nordeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 7\",\"pages\":\"e70175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物流行病学应公平地代表和造福人群,拥抱多样性和公平性,确保公平性。本文描述了药物流行病学中的公平和公平,描述了关键的多样性领域,并提供了一个操作框架和行动呼吁,以实现药物流行病学研究的多样性和公平。为了确保公平,研究应解决多样性和包容性问题,同时为目标人群中的每个人提供平等的机会和福利。为了实现和评估药物流行病学的公平性,我们定义了以下多样性领域:生理性别、社会建构性别、年龄、生命阶段(如怀孕、更年期)、种族、种族、移民、国籍、社会经济地位、教育、健康素养、健康状况和能力。这些因素是健康的决定因素,或通过生物学途径,或通过社会规范、歧视和妨碍保健或研究参与的障碍。它们是相互关联的,它们的影响是根据研究和具体情况而定的,由于它们的敏感性和不断发展的性质,应该谨慎处理。实施多样性领域使研究人员能够评估研究结果的普遍性,识别和解决卫生不公平现象,解释健康的决定因素,并确保算法、实施和建议的公平性。为了成功实施多样性领域并确保公平的药物流行病学研究,我们建议研究人员遵循探索,定制,实施和评估(ETIE)框架:探索多样性领域在研究中的作用/含义,根据研究背景定制其定义,适当实施并在其背景下评估研究结果。需要增加多样性数据的可用性,利益攸关方的支持至关重要。本文得到国际药物流行病学学会(ISPE)的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Health Equity in Europe: Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE)-A Framework of Diversity and Fairness in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.

Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信