重症神经损伤儿童及其PICU家庭:评估临床-家庭合作和相互关系的二次定性分析。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ryan F Sutyla, Jori F Bogetz, Saisha Dhar, Ellie Oslin, Victoria Parente, Sharron L Docherty, Monica Lemmon
{"title":"重症神经损伤儿童及其PICU家庭:评估临床-家庭合作和相互关系的二次定性分析。","authors":"Ryan F Sutyla, Jori F Bogetz, Saisha Dhar, Ellie Oslin, Victoria Parente, Sharron L Docherty, Monica Lemmon","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) admitted to the PICU, a trauma-informed approach to care may mitigate the effect of traumatic events on both parents and the child. We aimed to characterize the themes that impacted the trauma-informed care principle of collaboration and mutuality in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a post hoc secondary analysis of transcripts of interviews conducted for a prospective mixed methods cohort study examining the experiences of parents of children with SNI in the PICU and their clinicians in 2021-2023. Parents and clinicians had completed the semi-structured interviews peri-PICU discharge. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach. Two analysts coded all data independently, with differences resolved by consensus. Dedoose qualitative software was used to facilitate analysis, which followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quaternary academic center children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The original study (2021-2023) recruited parents of children and young people (3 mo to 25 yr old) with SNI who were admitted to the PICU and their PICU clinicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There were 34 transcribed interviews: 15 from parents and 19 from PICU clinicians of multiple disciplines. We identified facilitators of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality. Facilitators included: 1) knowing a patient beyond the medical chart; 2) understanding values; and 3) clinician(s)-family collaboration. Barriers included: 1) constraints of the PICU environment; 2) challenges when engaging fully with patients with SNI; 3) intrinsic variability among clinicians and parents; 4) families being overwhelmed amid critical illness; and 5) emotional toll on clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants described the importance of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality in the PICU, which underscores the impact of valuing partnerships between clinicians and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment and Their Families in the PICU: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis to Assess Clinician-Family Collaboration and Mutuality.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan F Sutyla, Jori F Bogetz, Saisha Dhar, Ellie Oslin, Victoria Parente, Sharron L Docherty, Monica Lemmon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) admitted to the PICU, a trauma-informed approach to care may mitigate the effect of traumatic events on both parents and the child. We aimed to characterize the themes that impacted the trauma-informed care principle of collaboration and mutuality in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a post hoc secondary analysis of transcripts of interviews conducted for a prospective mixed methods cohort study examining the experiences of parents of children with SNI in the PICU and their clinicians in 2021-2023. Parents and clinicians had completed the semi-structured interviews peri-PICU discharge. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach. Two analysts coded all data independently, with differences resolved by consensus. Dedoose qualitative software was used to facilitate analysis, which followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quaternary academic center children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The original study (2021-2023) recruited parents of children and young people (3 mo to 25 yr old) with SNI who were admitted to the PICU and their PICU clinicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There were 34 transcribed interviews: 15 from parents and 19 from PICU clinicians of multiple disciplines. We identified facilitators of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality. Facilitators included: 1) knowing a patient beyond the medical chart; 2) understanding values; and 3) clinician(s)-family collaboration. Barriers included: 1) constraints of the PICU environment; 2) challenges when engaging fully with patients with SNI; 3) intrinsic variability among clinicians and parents; 4) families being overwhelmed amid critical illness; and 5) emotional toll on clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants described the importance of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality in the PICU, which underscores the impact of valuing partnerships between clinicians and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003796\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在PICU收治的严重神经功能障碍(SNI)儿童中,创伤知情的护理方法可以减轻创伤事件对父母和孩子的影响。我们的目的是描述影响PICU创伤知情护理原则的主题。设计:本研究是对一项前瞻性混合方法队列研究的访谈记录进行的事后二次分析,该研究考察了2021-2023年PICU中SNI患儿的父母及其临床医生的经历。家长和临床医生在picu出院前后完成了半结构化访谈。数据分析采用传统的内容分析方法。两名分析师对所有数据进行独立编码,分歧通过共识解决。使用Dedoose定性软件来促进分析,它遵循报告定性研究指南的统一标准。单位:第四学术中心儿童医院。患者:最初的研究(2021-2023)招募了入院PICU的SNI儿童和年轻人(3个月至25岁)的父母及其PICU临床医生。干预措施:没有。测量方法和主要结果:34个转录访谈:15个来自家长,19个来自多学科PICU临床医生。我们确定了合作和相互关系的促进因素和障碍。辅助因素包括:1)了解病人病历以外的情况;2)理解价值观;3)临床医生-家庭合作。障碍包括:1)PICU环境的制约;2)与SNI患者充分接触时的挑战;临床医生和家长之间的内在变异性;4)病重家庭不堪重负;5)对临床医生的情感伤害。结论:参与者描述了PICU中合作和互助的重要性和障碍,强调了重视临床医生和家庭之间伙伴关系的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment and Their Families in the PICU: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis to Assess Clinician-Family Collaboration and Mutuality.

Objectives: In children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) admitted to the PICU, a trauma-informed approach to care may mitigate the effect of traumatic events on both parents and the child. We aimed to characterize the themes that impacted the trauma-informed care principle of collaboration and mutuality in the PICU.

Design: This study is a post hoc secondary analysis of transcripts of interviews conducted for a prospective mixed methods cohort study examining the experiences of parents of children with SNI in the PICU and their clinicians in 2021-2023. Parents and clinicians had completed the semi-structured interviews peri-PICU discharge. Data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach. Two analysts coded all data independently, with differences resolved by consensus. Dedoose qualitative software was used to facilitate analysis, which followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

Setting: Quaternary academic center children's hospital.

Patients: The original study (2021-2023) recruited parents of children and young people (3 mo to 25 yr old) with SNI who were admitted to the PICU and their PICU clinicians.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: There were 34 transcribed interviews: 15 from parents and 19 from PICU clinicians of multiple disciplines. We identified facilitators of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality. Facilitators included: 1) knowing a patient beyond the medical chart; 2) understanding values; and 3) clinician(s)-family collaboration. Barriers included: 1) constraints of the PICU environment; 2) challenges when engaging fully with patients with SNI; 3) intrinsic variability among clinicians and parents; 4) families being overwhelmed amid critical illness; and 5) emotional toll on clinicians.

Conclusions: Participants described the importance of and barriers to collaboration and mutuality in the PICU, which underscores the impact of valuing partnerships between clinicians and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信