辅助增量普瑞巴林治疗慢性胰腺炎患者疼痛缓解效果更好:一项双盲随机对照试验

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Randeep Rana, Samagra Agarwal, Sumaira Qamar, Srikanth Gopi, Renu Bhatia, Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya
{"title":"辅助增量普瑞巴林治疗慢性胰腺炎患者疼痛缓解效果更好:一项双盲随机对照试验","authors":"Randeep Rana, Samagra Agarwal, Sumaira Qamar, Srikanth Gopi, Renu Bhatia, Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gabapentinoids like pregabalin have been inadequately explored in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) on a long-term basis. The objective was to study the pain relief on pregabalin as an adjunct therapy for 12 weeks in painful CP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, patients with painful CP with no ongoing inflammation(no pseudocyst/inflammatory head mass) or significant obstruction were randomized to receive either incremental doses of pregabalin or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Izbicki pain score. Change in the quality of life (QoL) (SF-36 questionnaire), interference of pain with daily life [modified brief pain inventory- short form (mBPI-SF)] and patients' global impression of change (PGIC) were assessed as secondary outcomes. Tolerability and adverse effects were noted as safety outcomes. As an exploratory outcome, the role of quantitative sensory testing (QST) to predict patients' response to pregabalin was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients with painful CP (age 29.9±10.6 y; 79% males; median illness duration 36 mo) were randomized to receive pregabalin (n=30) or placebo (n=25). Change in Izbicki pain score was significantly better in pregabalin group [pregabalin: -23.75 (IQR: -9.69 to -43.75) versus placebo: -8.75 (3.44 to -17.50); P=0.005]. Overall QoL and PGIC were also better and interference of pain with daily activities reduced in the pregabalin group [median change BPI severity pregabalin: -1.83 (-0.83 to -3.75) versus placebo: -0.67 (0.33 to -1.42); P=0.008; BPI interference pregabalin: -2.64 (-0.33 to -5.21) versus placebo: -0.43 (1.18 to -2.29); P=0.009]. Frequent adverse events included sleepiness (51.7%) and giddiness (58%) but drug discontinuation occurred in only 10.4% of patients. No QST parameters could predict pain response to pregabalin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregabalin is a useful adjunct to pain management in patients with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjunctive Incremental Pregabalin Therapy Leads to Better Pain Relief in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Randeep Rana, Samagra Agarwal, Sumaira Qamar, Srikanth Gopi, Renu Bhatia, Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan, Deepak Gunjan, Anoop Saraya\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gabapentinoids like pregabalin have been inadequately explored in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) on a long-term basis. The objective was to study the pain relief on pregabalin as an adjunct therapy for 12 weeks in painful CP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, patients with painful CP with no ongoing inflammation(no pseudocyst/inflammatory head mass) or significant obstruction were randomized to receive either incremental doses of pregabalin or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Izbicki pain score. Change in the quality of life (QoL) (SF-36 questionnaire), interference of pain with daily life [modified brief pain inventory- short form (mBPI-SF)] and patients' global impression of change (PGIC) were assessed as secondary outcomes. Tolerability and adverse effects were noted as safety outcomes. As an exploratory outcome, the role of quantitative sensory testing (QST) to predict patients' response to pregabalin was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients with painful CP (age 29.9±10.6 y; 79% males; median illness duration 36 mo) were randomized to receive pregabalin (n=30) or placebo (n=25). Change in Izbicki pain score was significantly better in pregabalin group [pregabalin: -23.75 (IQR: -9.69 to -43.75) versus placebo: -8.75 (3.44 to -17.50); P=0.005]. Overall QoL and PGIC were also better and interference of pain with daily activities reduced in the pregabalin group [median change BPI severity pregabalin: -1.83 (-0.83 to -3.75) versus placebo: -0.67 (0.33 to -1.42); P=0.008; BPI interference pregabalin: -2.64 (-0.33 to -5.21) versus placebo: -0.43 (1.18 to -2.29); P=0.009]. Frequent adverse events included sleepiness (51.7%) and giddiness (58%) but drug discontinuation occurred in only 10.4% of patients. No QST parameters could predict pain response to pregabalin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregabalin is a useful adjunct to pain management in patients with CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:加巴喷丁类药物如普瑞巴林在疼痛性慢性胰腺炎(CP)患者中的长期应用研究尚不充分。目的是研究普瑞巴林作为12周疼痛性CP辅助治疗的疼痛缓解。材料和方法:在这项双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验中,无持续炎症(无假性囊肿/炎性头部肿块)或明显梗阻的疼痛性CP患者随机接受普瑞巴林或安慰剂的增量剂量,为期12周。主要观察指标为Izbicki疼痛评分的变化。生活质量(QoL)的改变(SF-36问卷)、疼痛对日常生活的干扰[改进的简短疼痛量表-短表(mBPI-SF)]和患者对变化的总体印象(PGIC)作为次要结局进行评估。耐受性和不良反应被认为是安全结果。作为一项探索性结果,定量感觉测试(QST)在预测患者对普瑞巴林的反应中的作用被评估。结果:55例疼痛性CP患者(年龄29.9±10.6岁;男性79%;中位病程36个月)随机接受普瑞巴林(n=30)或安慰剂(n=25)。普瑞巴林组Izbicki疼痛评分变化明显优于普瑞巴林组[普瑞巴林:-23.75 (IQR: -9.69 ~ -43.75),安慰剂组:-8.75 (3.44 ~ -17.50);P = 0.005)。普瑞巴林组的总体生活质量和PGIC也更好,疼痛对日常活动的干扰也减少了[普瑞巴林组的中位变化BPI严重程度:-1.83(-0.83至-3.75)与安慰剂组的中位变化BPI严重程度:-0.67(0.33至-1.42);P = 0.008;BPI干扰普瑞巴林:-2.64(-0.33至-5.21)vs安慰剂:-0.43(1.18至-2.29);P = 0.009)。常见的不良事件包括嗜睡(51.7%)和头晕(58%),但只有10.4%的患者停药。QST参数不能预测普瑞巴林的疼痛反应。结论:普瑞巴林是CP患者疼痛管理的有效辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjunctive Incremental Pregabalin Therapy Leads to Better Pain Relief in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: Gabapentinoids like pregabalin have been inadequately explored in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) on a long-term basis. The objective was to study the pain relief on pregabalin as an adjunct therapy for 12 weeks in painful CP.

Materials and methods: In this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, patients with painful CP with no ongoing inflammation(no pseudocyst/inflammatory head mass) or significant obstruction were randomized to receive either incremental doses of pregabalin or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Izbicki pain score. Change in the quality of life (QoL) (SF-36 questionnaire), interference of pain with daily life [modified brief pain inventory- short form (mBPI-SF)] and patients' global impression of change (PGIC) were assessed as secondary outcomes. Tolerability and adverse effects were noted as safety outcomes. As an exploratory outcome, the role of quantitative sensory testing (QST) to predict patients' response to pregabalin was assessed.

Results: Fifty-five patients with painful CP (age 29.9±10.6 y; 79% males; median illness duration 36 mo) were randomized to receive pregabalin (n=30) or placebo (n=25). Change in Izbicki pain score was significantly better in pregabalin group [pregabalin: -23.75 (IQR: -9.69 to -43.75) versus placebo: -8.75 (3.44 to -17.50); P=0.005]. Overall QoL and PGIC were also better and interference of pain with daily activities reduced in the pregabalin group [median change BPI severity pregabalin: -1.83 (-0.83 to -3.75) versus placebo: -0.67 (0.33 to -1.42); P=0.008; BPI interference pregabalin: -2.64 (-0.33 to -5.21) versus placebo: -0.43 (1.18 to -2.29); P=0.009]. Frequent adverse events included sleepiness (51.7%) and giddiness (58%) but drug discontinuation occurred in only 10.4% of patients. No QST parameters could predict pain response to pregabalin.

Conclusions: Pregabalin is a useful adjunct to pain management in patients with CP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信