发展伊朗健康保险福利优化模型- IR-HIBOM:基本健康保险福利包设计决策规则的多准则决策分析。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ali Darvishi, Ali Akbari Sari, Mehdi Yaseri, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh, Rajabali Daroudi
{"title":"发展伊朗健康保险福利优化模型- IR-HIBOM:基本健康保险福利包设计决策规则的多准则决策分析。","authors":"Ali Darvishi, Ali Akbari Sari, Mehdi Yaseri, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh, Rajabali Daroudi","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prioritization of health technologies for insurance coverage is usually based on explicit and implicit criteria. This study presents the development of the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model, the Iranian Health Insurance Benefit Optimization Model (IR-HIBOM), to inform the design of basic health insurance benefit packages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial set of twenty-nine potential allocation criteria was identified through a review of available evidence and other relevant literature. Review of this set by three specialized panels yielded a final set of thirteen criteria. A cross-sectional survey using the best-worst scaling method was then fielded to 163 health system experts to evaluate their preferences regarding the relative importance of the allocation criteria. The mixed logit method was employed to determine the weight of the relative importance of each criterion. Subsequently, a multilevel criteria scoring framework was defined based on a review of similar models and input from a panel of five expert members of the study team. Finally, model's appraisal was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen criteria, including relative safety, efficacy, disease severity, access to alternative health technologies, budget impacts, cost-effectiveness, quality of evidence, population size, age, job absenteeism, economic status, daily care needs, and ease-of-use/acceptance were selected. Cost-effectiveness and ease-of-use criteria had the highest and lowest relative importance weights, with 30.5 percent and 1 percent, respectively. Furthermore, scores were determined for the several levels of each criterion, and decision rules were defined for the cost-effectiveness and budget impact criteria. The final model's appraisal, based on weighted scores of thirteen selected technologies, indicated that it was valid and applicable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IR-HIBOM demonstrated its potential utility in the health resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Darvishi, Ali Akbari Sari, Mehdi Yaseri, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh, Rajabali Daroudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325100263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prioritization of health technologies for insurance coverage is usually based on explicit and implicit criteria. This study presents the development of the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model, the Iranian Health Insurance Benefit Optimization Model (IR-HIBOM), to inform the design of basic health insurance benefit packages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial set of twenty-nine potential allocation criteria was identified through a review of available evidence and other relevant literature. Review of this set by three specialized panels yielded a final set of thirteen criteria. A cross-sectional survey using the best-worst scaling method was then fielded to 163 health system experts to evaluate their preferences regarding the relative importance of the allocation criteria. The mixed logit method was employed to determine the weight of the relative importance of each criterion. Subsequently, a multilevel criteria scoring framework was defined based on a review of similar models and input from a panel of five expert members of the study team. Finally, model's appraisal was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen criteria, including relative safety, efficacy, disease severity, access to alternative health technologies, budget impacts, cost-effectiveness, quality of evidence, population size, age, job absenteeism, economic status, daily care needs, and ease-of-use/acceptance were selected. Cost-effectiveness and ease-of-use criteria had the highest and lowest relative importance weights, with 30.5 percent and 1 percent, respectively. Furthermore, scores were determined for the several levels of each criterion, and decision rules were defined for the cost-effectiveness and budget impact criteria. The final model's appraisal, based on weighted scores of thirteen selected technologies, indicated that it was valid and applicable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IR-HIBOM demonstrated its potential utility in the health resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:保健技术在保险范围内的优先次序通常基于明确和隐含的标准。本研究提出了多标准决策分析(MCDA)模型,即伊朗健康保险福利优化模型(IR-HIBOM)的发展,为基本健康保险福利方案的设计提供信息。方法:通过对现有证据和其他相关文献的回顾,初步确定了29个潜在的分配标准。三个专门小组对这套标准进行了审查,产生了最后一套13项标准。然后对163名卫生系统专家进行了横断面调查,使用最佳-最差缩放法来评估他们对分配标准的相对重要性的偏好。采用混合logit法确定各指标相对重要性的权重。随后,基于对类似模型的审查和研究小组五名专家成员的输入,定义了多级标准评分框架。最后,对模型进行了评价。结果:选择了13项标准,包括相对安全性、有效性、疾病严重程度、替代卫生技术的可及性、预算影响、成本效益、证据质量、人口规模、年龄、缺勤率、经济状况、日常护理需求和易用性/可接受性。成本效益和易用性标准具有最高和最低的相对重要性权重,分别为30.5%和1%。此外,为每个标准的几个级别确定了分数,并为成本效益和预算影响标准定义了决策规则。最终模型的评价,基于13个选定的技术加权得分,表明它是有效的和适用的。结论:IR-HIBOM显示了其在卫生资源分配中的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.

Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.

Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.

Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.

Objectives: Prioritization of health technologies for insurance coverage is usually based on explicit and implicit criteria. This study presents the development of the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model, the Iranian Health Insurance Benefit Optimization Model (IR-HIBOM), to inform the design of basic health insurance benefit packages.

Methods: An initial set of twenty-nine potential allocation criteria was identified through a review of available evidence and other relevant literature. Review of this set by three specialized panels yielded a final set of thirteen criteria. A cross-sectional survey using the best-worst scaling method was then fielded to 163 health system experts to evaluate their preferences regarding the relative importance of the allocation criteria. The mixed logit method was employed to determine the weight of the relative importance of each criterion. Subsequently, a multilevel criteria scoring framework was defined based on a review of similar models and input from a panel of five expert members of the study team. Finally, model's appraisal was conducted.

Results: Thirteen criteria, including relative safety, efficacy, disease severity, access to alternative health technologies, budget impacts, cost-effectiveness, quality of evidence, population size, age, job absenteeism, economic status, daily care needs, and ease-of-use/acceptance were selected. Cost-effectiveness and ease-of-use criteria had the highest and lowest relative importance weights, with 30.5 percent and 1 percent, respectively. Furthermore, scores were determined for the several levels of each criterion, and decision rules were defined for the cost-effectiveness and budget impact criteria. The final model's appraisal, based on weighted scores of thirteen selected technologies, indicated that it was valid and applicable.

Conclusions: The IR-HIBOM demonstrated its potential utility in the health resource allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信