比较静脉注射利多卡因、右美托咪定和利多卡因-右美托咪定对颅内肿瘤患者头盖骨钉应用后疼痛反应的减弱:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机对照研究。

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_266_24
Swathi Mallikarjuna, Rajnish Arora, Anissa Mirza, Sanjay Agrawal
{"title":"比较静脉注射利多卡因、右美托咪定和利多卡因-右美托咪定对颅内肿瘤患者头盖骨钉应用后疼痛反应的减弱:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机对照研究。","authors":"Swathi Mallikarjuna, Rajnish Arora, Anissa Mirza, Sanjay Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_266_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Skull pin application during craniotomy elicits haemodynamic responses that may be detrimental to the patient. This study evaluates and compares the effects of intravenous (IV) lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, and lignocaine-dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic and stress response to skull pins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study was conducted on 160 patients aged 18-60 years. Patients for craniotomy with skull pin application were randomly assigned to receive IV lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h (Group L), dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group D), lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group LD), and normal saline bolus (15 min) followed by 5 mL/h (Group N) for 30 min after skull pin insertion. Haemodynamic variables (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index) and stress response (serum cortisol, prolactin, blood sugar, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) were observed at different periods. For group comparisons, a one-way analysis of variance was used for preoperative blood sugar, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for heart rate, blood pressure, bispectral index, serum cortisol, serum prolactin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Haemodynamic fluctuations were less in groups D and LD. Group LD had decreased levels of serum cortisol (<i>P</i> < 0.001), prolactin (<i>P</i> = 0.315), and NLR (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Blood sugar increased in all groups but was significant in groups N and D (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dexmedetomidine-lignocaine infusion is associated with few haemodynamic fluctuations and decreased stress response compared to lignocaine or dexmedetomidine alone, hence better in attenuating skull pin response.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 4","pages":"350-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intravenous lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, and lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion for attenuation of pain response to skull pin application in patients of intracranial tumours: A placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Swathi Mallikarjuna, Rajnish Arora, Anissa Mirza, Sanjay Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_266_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Skull pin application during craniotomy elicits haemodynamic responses that may be detrimental to the patient. This study evaluates and compares the effects of intravenous (IV) lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, and lignocaine-dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic and stress response to skull pins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study was conducted on 160 patients aged 18-60 years. Patients for craniotomy with skull pin application were randomly assigned to receive IV lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h (Group L), dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group D), lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group LD), and normal saline bolus (15 min) followed by 5 mL/h (Group N) for 30 min after skull pin insertion. Haemodynamic variables (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index) and stress response (serum cortisol, prolactin, blood sugar, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) were observed at different periods. For group comparisons, a one-way analysis of variance was used for preoperative blood sugar, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for heart rate, blood pressure, bispectral index, serum cortisol, serum prolactin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Haemodynamic fluctuations were less in groups D and LD. Group LD had decreased levels of serum cortisol (<i>P</i> < 0.001), prolactin (<i>P</i> = 0.315), and NLR (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Blood sugar increased in all groups but was significant in groups N and D (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dexmedetomidine-lignocaine infusion is associated with few haemodynamic fluctuations and decreased stress response compared to lignocaine or dexmedetomidine alone, hence better in attenuating skull pin response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"350-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_266_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_266_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:颅骨开颅术中使用颅骨针会引起血流动力学反应,可能对患者有害。本研究评估和比较静脉注射(IV)利多卡因、右美托咪定和利多卡因-右美托咪定对颅骨钉血流动力学和应激反应的影响。方法:本随机研究纳入160例年龄18-60岁的患者。采用颅骨钉开颅术的患者被随机分配给静脉注射利多卡因2 mg/kg (15 min)后1.5 mg/kg/h (L组),右美托咪定1µg/kg (15 min)后0.5µg/kg/h (D组),利多卡因2 mg/kg (15 min)后1.5 mg/kg/h,右美托咪定1µg/kg (15 min)后0.5µg/kg/h (LD组),以及生理盐水(15 min)后5 mL/h (N组),颅骨钉插入后30 min。观察不同时期血流动力学变量(心率、平均动脉压、双谱指数)和应激反应(血清皮质醇、催乳素、血糖、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(NLR))。组间比较,术前血糖采用单因素方差分析,心率、血压、双谱指数、血清皮质醇、血清催乳素、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:D组和LD组血流动力学波动较小,LD组血清皮质醇(P < 0.001)、催乳素(P = 0.315)、NLR (P = 0.002)水平降低。各组血糖均升高,但N、D组显著升高(P < 0.001)。结论:与单独使用利多卡因或右美托咪定相比,输注右美托咪定-利多卡因血流动力学波动小,应激反应降低,减轻颅骨钉反应效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of intravenous lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, and lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion for attenuation of pain response to skull pin application in patients of intracranial tumours: A placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised comparative study.

Background and aims: Skull pin application during craniotomy elicits haemodynamic responses that may be detrimental to the patient. This study evaluates and compares the effects of intravenous (IV) lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, and lignocaine-dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic and stress response to skull pins.

Methods: This randomised study was conducted on 160 patients aged 18-60 years. Patients for craniotomy with skull pin application were randomly assigned to receive IV lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h (Group L), dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group D), lignocaine 2 mg/kg (15 min) followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (15 min) followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h (Group LD), and normal saline bolus (15 min) followed by 5 mL/h (Group N) for 30 min after skull pin insertion. Haemodynamic variables (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index) and stress response (serum cortisol, prolactin, blood sugar, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) were observed at different periods. For group comparisons, a one-way analysis of variance was used for preoperative blood sugar, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for heart rate, blood pressure, bispectral index, serum cortisol, serum prolactin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Results: Haemodynamic fluctuations were less in groups D and LD. Group LD had decreased levels of serum cortisol (P < 0.001), prolactin (P = 0.315), and NLR (P = 0.002). Blood sugar increased in all groups but was significant in groups N and D (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The dexmedetomidine-lignocaine infusion is associated with few haemodynamic fluctuations and decreased stress response compared to lignocaine or dexmedetomidine alone, hence better in attenuating skull pin response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信