Niven Mehra, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Se Hoon Park, Jeffrey C Goh, Ray McDermott, Nuria Sala Gonzalez, Peter C Fong, Richard Greil, Maria De Santis, Patricio Eduardo Yanez, Yi-Hsiu Huang, Stephen D Begbie, Felipe Rey, Gero Kramer, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Todd L Saretsky, Sameer R Ghate, Yi Cui, Christian Hosius, Evan Y Yu
{"title":"KEYLYNK-010患者报告的结果：派姆单抗联合奥拉帕尼与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺对未选择生物标志物的既往治疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的疗效","authors":"Niven Mehra, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Se Hoon Park, Jeffrey C Goh, Ray McDermott, Nuria Sala Gonzalez, Peter C Fong, Richard Greil, Maria De Santis, Patricio Eduardo Yanez, Yi-Hsiu Huang, Stephen D Begbie, Felipe Rey, Gero Kramer, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Todd L Saretsky, Sameer R Ghate, Yi Cui, Christian Hosius, Evan Y Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry: </strong>NCT03834519.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Niven Mehra, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Se Hoon Park, Jeffrey C Goh, Ray McDermott, Nuria Sala Gonzalez, Peter C Fong, Richard Greil, Maria De Santis, Patricio Eduardo Yanez, Yi-Hsiu Huang, Stephen D Begbie, Felipe Rey, Gero Kramer, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Todd L Saretsky, Sameer R Ghate, Yi Cui, Christian Hosius, Evan Y Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry: </strong>NCT03834519.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Background and objective: Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010.
Methods: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores.
Key findings and limitations: The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing.
Conclusions and clinical implications: No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC.
期刊介绍：
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
