畜牧业微塑料的潜在经济损失:对选定动物的研究

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Adi Sutanto, Iswahyudi Iswahyudi, Imbang Dwi Rahayu, Asmah Hidayati, Marchel Putra Garfansa, Yusnita Wahyuni Silitonga, Rafiqah Amanda Lubis, Mukhlis Mukhlis, Muhammad Nizar Hanafiah Nasution, Dodi Sukma R. A.
{"title":"畜牧业微塑料的潜在经济损失:对选定动物的研究","authors":"Adi Sutanto,&nbsp;Iswahyudi Iswahyudi,&nbsp;Imbang Dwi Rahayu,&nbsp;Asmah Hidayati,&nbsp;Marchel Putra Garfansa,&nbsp;Yusnita Wahyuni Silitonga,&nbsp;Rafiqah Amanda Lubis,&nbsp;Mukhlis Mukhlis,&nbsp;Muhammad Nizar Hanafiah Nasution,&nbsp;Dodi Sukma R. A.","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Economic losses in the livestock sector have been done, but how much economic loss is caused by exposure to microplastics in certain animals has never been done. This study aims to analyze the impact of microplastics on economic losses in laboratory animals (mice) and poultry (ducks). The method used was in the form of secondary data analysis on the rate of animal mortality due to exposure to various types of microplastics. The data are used to simulate the amount of production, annual population, and potential economic losses per cycle and per year. Economic value is determined based on the latest prices, and minimum prices. The results showed that exposure to microplastics in animals led to 20% to 80% deaths, with potential annual losses reaching USD 113,568 in rat farmers, while in ducks, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) exposure led to embryo death by 35% and annual losses of up to USD 6,859,091.14. These findings suggest that the economic impact of microplastics has the potential to outweigh losses due to conventional biological threats such as infectious diseases. The study concluded that microplastics can be a significant factor in reducing productivity and causing large economic losses in the livestock sector. The impact of these findings is crucial in driving the need for regulations and mitigation strategies to control microplastic exposure in the farm environment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Economic Losses From Microplastics in the Livestock Sector: A Study on Selected Animals\",\"authors\":\"Adi Sutanto,&nbsp;Iswahyudi Iswahyudi,&nbsp;Imbang Dwi Rahayu,&nbsp;Asmah Hidayati,&nbsp;Marchel Putra Garfansa,&nbsp;Yusnita Wahyuni Silitonga,&nbsp;Rafiqah Amanda Lubis,&nbsp;Mukhlis Mukhlis,&nbsp;Muhammad Nizar Hanafiah Nasution,&nbsp;Dodi Sukma R. A.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tqem.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Economic losses in the livestock sector have been done, but how much economic loss is caused by exposure to microplastics in certain animals has never been done. This study aims to analyze the impact of microplastics on economic losses in laboratory animals (mice) and poultry (ducks). The method used was in the form of secondary data analysis on the rate of animal mortality due to exposure to various types of microplastics. The data are used to simulate the amount of production, annual population, and potential economic losses per cycle and per year. Economic value is determined based on the latest prices, and minimum prices. The results showed that exposure to microplastics in animals led to 20% to 80% deaths, with potential annual losses reaching USD 113,568 in rat farmers, while in ducks, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) exposure led to embryo death by 35% and annual losses of up to USD 6,859,091.14. These findings suggest that the economic impact of microplastics has the potential to outweigh losses due to conventional biological threats such as infectious diseases. The study concluded that microplastics can be a significant factor in reducing productivity and causing large economic losses in the livestock sector. The impact of these findings is crucial in driving the need for regulations and mitigation strategies to control microplastic exposure in the farm environment.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

畜牧业的经济损失已经确定,但某些动物因接触微塑料而造成的经济损失有多大却从未得到过统计。本研究旨在分析微塑料对实验动物(小鼠)和家禽(鸭)经济损失的影响。所使用的方法是对接触各种微塑料造成的动物死亡率进行二次数据分析。这些数据被用来模拟每个周期和每年的产量、年人口和潜在的经济损失。经济价值是根据最新价格和最低价格确定的。结果表明,动物接触微塑料导致20%至80%的死亡,在养鼠者中,潜在的年损失达到113,568美元,而在鸭子中,聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)接触导致35%的胚胎死亡,年损失高达6,859,091.14美元。这些发现表明,微塑料的经济影响有可能超过传染病等传统生物威胁造成的损失。该研究得出结论,微塑料可能是降低畜牧业生产力和造成巨大经济损失的一个重要因素。这些发现的影响对于推动制定法规和缓解战略以控制农场环境中的微塑料暴露至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential Economic Losses From Microplastics in the Livestock Sector: A Study on Selected Animals

Economic losses in the livestock sector have been done, but how much economic loss is caused by exposure to microplastics in certain animals has never been done. This study aims to analyze the impact of microplastics on economic losses in laboratory animals (mice) and poultry (ducks). The method used was in the form of secondary data analysis on the rate of animal mortality due to exposure to various types of microplastics. The data are used to simulate the amount of production, annual population, and potential economic losses per cycle and per year. Economic value is determined based on the latest prices, and minimum prices. The results showed that exposure to microplastics in animals led to 20% to 80% deaths, with potential annual losses reaching USD 113,568 in rat farmers, while in ducks, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) exposure led to embryo death by 35% and annual losses of up to USD 6,859,091.14. These findings suggest that the economic impact of microplastics has the potential to outweigh losses due to conventional biological threats such as infectious diseases. The study concluded that microplastics can be a significant factor in reducing productivity and causing large economic losses in the livestock sector. The impact of these findings is crucial in driving the need for regulations and mitigation strategies to control microplastic exposure in the farm environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信