使用远程保健并没有缓解北达科他州美洲印第安妇女获得产前护理方面持续存在的差距

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tara Stiller PhD, MPH, Anna Charlotta Kihlstrom MPH, Nishat Sultana  , Grace Njau PhD, Matthew Schmidt MPH, Anastasia Stepanov  , Andrew D. Williams PhD, MPH
{"title":"使用远程保健并没有缓解北达科他州美洲印第安妇女获得产前护理方面持续存在的差距","authors":"Tara Stiller PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Anna Charlotta Kihlstrom MPH,&nbsp;Nishat Sultana  ,&nbsp;Grace Njau PhD,&nbsp;Matthew Schmidt MPH,&nbsp;Anastasia Stepanov  ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Williams PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In North Dakota (ND), American Indian (AI) women face a persistent disparity in prenatal care (PNC) access compared to other women. During the COVID pandemic, the expansion of telehealth emerged as a potential solution to disparate access to health care. We examined whether telehealth use mitigated disparities in PNC in ND.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were drawn from the 2020 to 2021 ND Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (weighted <i>n</i> = 10,189). PNC initiation &gt;13 weeks gestation or not receiving PNC was considered “late/no PNC.” Maternal race/ethnicity was self-reported. Use of telehealth for prenatal visits was self-reported and categorized as “any telehealth use” versus “no telehealth use.” Those not using telehealth self-reported eight barriers to telehealth (e.g., lacking internet, no appointments). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for late/no PNC among AI and other race/ethnicity women compared to White women. Models included maternal sociodemographic and health factors. Chi-square was used to examine prevalence of telehealth barriers by race/ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to White women, AI/AN women were twice as likely to receive late/no PNC (OR: 2.40; 95% CI, 1.08, 5.35). When telehealth was accounted for, the AI–White disparity was lowered by only 2% (OR: 2.35; 95% CI, 1.05, 5.26). Compared to White and other race/ethnicity women, a higher prevalence of AI/AN women reported a lack of telehealth appointments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), no computers (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), no phones (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and no physical space (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) as barriers to telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of telehealth did not mitigate PNC disparities in ND. Infrastructure investments and culturally safe initiatives are needed to improve PNC access for AI/AN women.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of telehealth did not mitigate persistent disparities in prenatal care access among American Indian women in North Dakota\",\"authors\":\"Tara Stiller PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Anna Charlotta Kihlstrom MPH,&nbsp;Nishat Sultana  ,&nbsp;Grace Njau PhD,&nbsp;Matthew Schmidt MPH,&nbsp;Anastasia Stepanov  ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Williams PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In North Dakota (ND), American Indian (AI) women face a persistent disparity in prenatal care (PNC) access compared to other women. During the COVID pandemic, the expansion of telehealth emerged as a potential solution to disparate access to health care. We examined whether telehealth use mitigated disparities in PNC in ND.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were drawn from the 2020 to 2021 ND Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (weighted <i>n</i> = 10,189). PNC initiation &gt;13 weeks gestation or not receiving PNC was considered “late/no PNC.” Maternal race/ethnicity was self-reported. Use of telehealth for prenatal visits was self-reported and categorized as “any telehealth use” versus “no telehealth use.” Those not using telehealth self-reported eight barriers to telehealth (e.g., lacking internet, no appointments). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for late/no PNC among AI and other race/ethnicity women compared to White women. Models included maternal sociodemographic and health factors. Chi-square was used to examine prevalence of telehealth barriers by race/ethnicity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to White women, AI/AN women were twice as likely to receive late/no PNC (OR: 2.40; 95% CI, 1.08, 5.35). When telehealth was accounted for, the AI–White disparity was lowered by only 2% (OR: 2.35; 95% CI, 1.05, 5.26). Compared to White and other race/ethnicity women, a higher prevalence of AI/AN women reported a lack of telehealth appointments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), no computers (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), no phones (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and no physical space (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) as barriers to telehealth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of telehealth did not mitigate PNC disparities in ND. Infrastructure investments and culturally safe initiatives are needed to improve PNC access for AI/AN women.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在北达科他州(ND),美国印第安人(AI)妇女与其他妇女相比,在产前护理(PNC)方面面临着持续的差距。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,扩大远程医疗成为解决医疗服务获取不均等问题的一种潜在解决方案。我们研究了远程医疗的使用是否减轻了ND患者PNC的差异。方法收集2020 ~ 2021年新生儿妊娠风险评估监测系统数据(加权n = 10,189)。妊娠13周开始PNC或未接受PNC被认为是“晚期/无PNC”。母亲的种族/民族是自我报告的。使用远程保健进行产前检查的情况是自我报告的,并分类为“任何远程保健使用”与“没有远程保健使用”。不使用远程保健的人自述了远程保健的八项障碍(例如,缺乏互联网、没有预约)。Logistic回归估计了AI和其他种族/族裔女性与白人女性相比晚期/无PNC的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。模型包括产妇社会人口和健康因素。采用卡方法按种族/民族检查远程医疗障碍的流行程度。结果与白人妇女相比,AI/AN妇女接受晚期/无PNC的可能性是白人妇女的两倍(OR: 2.40;95% ci, 1.08, 5.35)。当考虑到远程医疗时,ai -白人的差距仅降低了2% (OR: 2.35;95% ci, 1.05, 5.26)。与白人和其他种族/族裔妇女相比,报告缺乏远程保健预约的AI/AN妇女的患病率较高(p <;0.01),没有电脑(p <;0.01),没有手机(p <;0.01),无物理空间(p <;0.01)是远程保健的障碍。远程医疗的使用并没有减轻ND中PNC的差异。需要基础设施投资和文化安全举措来改善AI/AN妇女获得PNC的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of telehealth did not mitigate persistent disparities in prenatal care access among American Indian women in North Dakota

Background

In North Dakota (ND), American Indian (AI) women face a persistent disparity in prenatal care (PNC) access compared to other women. During the COVID pandemic, the expansion of telehealth emerged as a potential solution to disparate access to health care. We examined whether telehealth use mitigated disparities in PNC in ND.

Methods

Data were drawn from the 2020 to 2021 ND Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (weighted n = 10,189). PNC initiation >13 weeks gestation or not receiving PNC was considered “late/no PNC.” Maternal race/ethnicity was self-reported. Use of telehealth for prenatal visits was self-reported and categorized as “any telehealth use” versus “no telehealth use.” Those not using telehealth self-reported eight barriers to telehealth (e.g., lacking internet, no appointments). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for late/no PNC among AI and other race/ethnicity women compared to White women. Models included maternal sociodemographic and health factors. Chi-square was used to examine prevalence of telehealth barriers by race/ethnicity.

Results

Compared to White women, AI/AN women were twice as likely to receive late/no PNC (OR: 2.40; 95% CI, 1.08, 5.35). When telehealth was accounted for, the AI–White disparity was lowered by only 2% (OR: 2.35; 95% CI, 1.05, 5.26). Compared to White and other race/ethnicity women, a higher prevalence of AI/AN women reported a lack of telehealth appointments (p < 0.01), no computers (p < 0.01), no phones (p < 0.01), and no physical space (p < 0.01) as barriers to telehealth.

Discussion

The use of telehealth did not mitigate PNC disparities in ND. Infrastructure investments and culturally safe initiatives are needed to improve PNC access for AI/AN women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信