心率变异性对器械辅助寰椎（C1）捏脊手法的反应：一项随机安慰剂对照试验

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.027

Thais de Souza Horsth , Ivan de Araujo Barros , Rafael Cotta de Souza , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Renato Santos de Almeida

{"title":"心率变异性对器械辅助寰椎（C1）捏脊手法的反应：一项随机安慰剂对照试验","authors":"Thais de Souza Horsth , Ivan de Araujo Barros , Rafael Cotta de Souza , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Renato Santos de Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Musculoskeletal pain is often linked to dysfunctions of the ANS. Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation is promising for modulating HRV through the ANS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of chiropractic manipulation on HRV in individuals with musculoskeletal pain compared to a placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized clinical trial included 64 participants aged 18–60 years (mean age = 32 ± 10.4) with acute or chronic musculoskeletal pain. The intervention group (IG) received a single high-velocity, low-amplitude impulse on the bilateral transverse processes of C1, while the control group (CG) received a placebo. HRV was recorded both pre- and post-intervention using a Polar H10 monitor and analyzed with Kubios HRV Standard (v3.5.0). Analysis was through repeated-measures ANOVA (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The IG showed a significant LF/HF change (<em>p</em> = 0.013), and the CG had a significant SD1/SD2 change (<em>p</em> = 0.02) in intra-group comparisons. No significant differences were found between IG and CG for variables such as SDNN, NN50, PNN50 %, SD1, SD2, LF/HF, and SD1/SD2.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Both interventions induced HRV changes without significant intergroup differences, suggesting uncontrolled factors may influence the autonomic response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation of C1 did not significantly change HRV vs. placebo, indicating the need for further studies on external variables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 784-788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate variability responses to instrument-assisted atlas (C1) chiropractic manipulation: A randomized placebo-controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Thais de Souza Horsth , Ivan de Araujo Barros , Rafael Cotta de Souza , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Renato Santos de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Musculoskeletal pain is often linked to dysfunctions of the ANS. Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation is promising for modulating HRV through the ANS.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of chiropractic manipulation on HRV in individuals with musculoskeletal pain compared to a placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized clinical trial included 64 participants aged 18–60 years (mean age = 32 ± 10.4) with acute or chronic musculoskeletal pain. The intervention group (IG) received a single high-velocity, low-amplitude impulse on the bilateral transverse processes of C1, while the control group (CG) received a placebo. HRV was recorded both pre- and post-intervention using a Polar H10 monitor and analyzed with Kubios HRV Standard (v3.5.0). Analysis was through repeated-measures ANOVA (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The IG showed a significant LF/HF change (<em>p</em> = 0.013), and the CG had a significant SD1/SD2 change (<em>p</em> = 0.02) in intra-group comparisons. No significant differences were found between IG and CG for variables such as SDNN, NN50, PNN50 %, SD1, SD2, LF/HF, and SD1/SD2.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Both interventions induced HRV changes without significant intergroup differences, suggesting uncontrolled factors may influence the autonomic response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation of C1 did not significantly change HRV vs. placebo, indicating the need for further studies on external variables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 784-788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉骨骼疼痛通常与ANS功能障碍有关，器械辅助的脊椎指压疗法有望通过ANS调节HRV。目的评估脊椎指压疗法对肌肉骨骼疼痛患者HRV的影响，并与安慰剂进行比较。方法随机临床试验纳入64例急性或慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者，年龄18-60岁（平均年龄32±10.4岁）。干预组（IG）对双侧C1横突进行单次高速低振幅脉冲，对照组（CG）给予安慰剂。使用Polar H10监测器记录干预前后的HRV，并使用Kubios HRV Standard （v3.5.0）进行分析。分析采用重复测量方差分析(p <；0.05)。结果IG组LF/HF变化显著（p = 0.013）， CG组SD1/SD2变化显著（p = 0.02）。IG组和CG组在SDNN、NN50、pnn50%、SD1、SD2、LF/HF、SD1/SD2等变量上均无显著差异。两种干预措施均诱导HRV改变，组间差异不显著，提示不受控制的因素可能影响自主神经反应。结论器械辅助捏脊手法对C1的HRV与安慰剂相比无显著性改变，提示需要进一步研究外部变量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Heart rate variability responses to instrument-assisted atlas (C1) chiropractic manipulation: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Introduction

Musculoskeletal pain is often linked to dysfunctions of the ANS. Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation is promising for modulating HRV through the ANS.

Objective

To assess the impact of chiropractic manipulation on HRV in individuals with musculoskeletal pain compared to a placebo.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial included 64 participants aged 18–60 years (mean age = 32 ± 10.4) with acute or chronic musculoskeletal pain. The intervention group (IG) received a single high-velocity, low-amplitude impulse on the bilateral transverse processes of C1, while the control group (CG) received a placebo. HRV was recorded both pre- and post-intervention using a Polar H10 monitor and analyzed with Kubios HRV Standard (v3.5.0). Analysis was through repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results

The IG showed a significant LF/HF change (p = 0.013), and the CG had a significant SD1/SD2 change (p = 0.02) in intra-group comparisons. No significant differences were found between IG and CG for variables such as SDNN, NN50, PNN50 %, SD1, SD2, LF/HF, and SD1/SD2.

Discussion

Both interventions induced HRV changes without significant intergroup differences, suggesting uncontrolled factors may influence the autonomic response.

Conclusion

Instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation of C1 did not significantly change HRV vs. placebo, indicating the need for further studies on external variables.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

133

审稿时长

321 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina