脑死亡器官供者的抗感染管理-两个中心的回顾性分析显示需要改进

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jan Sönke Englbrecht , Hendrik Bracht , Julian Philip Gehrenkemper , Rainer Borgstedt , Dominic Witzke , Antje Gottschalk , Christian Lanckohr
{"title":"脑死亡器官供者的抗感染管理-两个中心的回顾性分析显示需要改进","authors":"Jan Sönke Englbrecht ,&nbsp;Hendrik Bracht ,&nbsp;Julian Philip Gehrenkemper ,&nbsp;Rainer Borgstedt ,&nbsp;Dominic Witzke ,&nbsp;Antje Gottschalk ,&nbsp;Christian Lanckohr","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adequate donor management is essential to increase the number of transplantable organs. No specific recommendations about anti-infective management for organ donors are available and the sparse literature indicates that antimicrobials are used too liberally. We analyzed anti-infective management of brain-dead donors to add to the limited evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All brain-dead donors at the University Hospitals Münster (2010–2024) and Bielefeld Bethel (2020–2024) were retrospectively included. The use and indication of antimicrobials, microbiological diagnostics and inflammatory markers were assessed during intensive care unit stay and organ retrieval.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>149 donors were included, 76.5 % received antimicrobials in the intensive care unit and 21.5 % during organ retrieval. Antimicrobial exposure did not correlate between both periods. Indication for antimicrobials was documented in 61 % of donors, with aspiration pneumonia (33 %) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (33 %) being the most common diagnoses. Positive microbiological cultures were found in 36 % of donors but without correlation to antimicrobial exposure or length of exposure. The proportion of donors with out of normal range values for C-reactive protein (67–100 %), white blood cell count (53–88 %) and procalcitonin (22–43 %) was high, but only C-reactive protein differed between the day before and the day of brain death diagnosis and between infected and non-infected donors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Antimicrobial use was high during intensive care unit stay, low during organ retrieval and inconsistent between both periods. Inflammatory markers were insufficient to indicate infection. Aggravated by a lack of evidence-based recommendations, this indicates inadequate anti-infective management of DBD donors, which may have a negative impact on the organ recipient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 155196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-infective management in brain-dead organ donors – A retrospective analysis at two centers reveals need for improvement\",\"authors\":\"Jan Sönke Englbrecht ,&nbsp;Hendrik Bracht ,&nbsp;Julian Philip Gehrenkemper ,&nbsp;Rainer Borgstedt ,&nbsp;Dominic Witzke ,&nbsp;Antje Gottschalk ,&nbsp;Christian Lanckohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adequate donor management is essential to increase the number of transplantable organs. No specific recommendations about anti-infective management for organ donors are available and the sparse literature indicates that antimicrobials are used too liberally. We analyzed anti-infective management of brain-dead donors to add to the limited evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All brain-dead donors at the University Hospitals Münster (2010–2024) and Bielefeld Bethel (2020–2024) were retrospectively included. The use and indication of antimicrobials, microbiological diagnostics and inflammatory markers were assessed during intensive care unit stay and organ retrieval.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>149 donors were included, 76.5 % received antimicrobials in the intensive care unit and 21.5 % during organ retrieval. Antimicrobial exposure did not correlate between both periods. Indication for antimicrobials was documented in 61 % of donors, with aspiration pneumonia (33 %) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (33 %) being the most common diagnoses. Positive microbiological cultures were found in 36 % of donors but without correlation to antimicrobial exposure or length of exposure. The proportion of donors with out of normal range values for C-reactive protein (67–100 %), white blood cell count (53–88 %) and procalcitonin (22–43 %) was high, but only C-reactive protein differed between the day before and the day of brain death diagnosis and between infected and non-infected donors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Antimicrobial use was high during intensive care unit stay, low during organ retrieval and inconsistent between both periods. Inflammatory markers were insufficient to indicate infection. Aggravated by a lack of evidence-based recommendations, this indicates inadequate anti-infective management of DBD donors, which may have a negative impact on the organ recipient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景充分的供体管理是增加可移植器官数量的关键。没有关于器官供体抗感染管理的具体建议,并且稀疏的文献表明抗菌剂的使用过于随意。我们分析了脑死亡供者的抗感染管理,以补充有限的证据。方法回顾性分析内斯特大学医院(2010-2024年)和比勒费尔德伯特利大学医院(2020-2024年)所有脑死亡供体。在重症监护病房住院和器官取出期间评估抗菌剂、微生物诊断和炎症标志物的使用和适应症。结果149例献血者中,76.5%在重症监护病房接受了抗菌素治疗,21.5%在器官摘取期间接受了抗菌素治疗。抗微生物药物暴露在两个时期之间没有相关性。61%的献血者有抗菌素适应症,其中吸入性肺炎(33%)和呼吸机相关肺炎(33%)是最常见的诊断。36%的献血者发现微生物培养阳性,但与抗菌药物暴露或暴露时间无关。供者c -反应蛋白(67 - 100%)、白细胞计数(53 - 88%)和降钙素原(22 - 43%)超出正常范围的比例较高,但只有c -反应蛋白在脑死亡诊断前一天和当天以及感染和未感染的供者之间存在差异。结论重症监护病房期间抗菌药物使用率高,器官取出期间抗菌药物使用率低,且两者不一致。炎症标志物不足以表明感染。由于缺乏循证建议,这表明对DBD供者的抗感染管理不足,这可能对器官接受者产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anti-infective management in brain-dead organ donors – A retrospective analysis at two centers reveals need for improvement

Anti-infective management in brain-dead organ donors – A retrospective analysis at two centers reveals need for improvement

Background

Adequate donor management is essential to increase the number of transplantable organs. No specific recommendations about anti-infective management for organ donors are available and the sparse literature indicates that antimicrobials are used too liberally. We analyzed anti-infective management of brain-dead donors to add to the limited evidence.

Methods

All brain-dead donors at the University Hospitals Münster (2010–2024) and Bielefeld Bethel (2020–2024) were retrospectively included. The use and indication of antimicrobials, microbiological diagnostics and inflammatory markers were assessed during intensive care unit stay and organ retrieval.

Results

149 donors were included, 76.5 % received antimicrobials in the intensive care unit and 21.5 % during organ retrieval. Antimicrobial exposure did not correlate between both periods. Indication for antimicrobials was documented in 61 % of donors, with aspiration pneumonia (33 %) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (33 %) being the most common diagnoses. Positive microbiological cultures were found in 36 % of donors but without correlation to antimicrobial exposure or length of exposure. The proportion of donors with out of normal range values for C-reactive protein (67–100 %), white blood cell count (53–88 %) and procalcitonin (22–43 %) was high, but only C-reactive protein differed between the day before and the day of brain death diagnosis and between infected and non-infected donors.

Conclusion

Antimicrobial use was high during intensive care unit stay, low during organ retrieval and inconsistent between both periods. Inflammatory markers were insufficient to indicate infection. Aggravated by a lack of evidence-based recommendations, this indicates inadequate anti-infective management of DBD donors, which may have a negative impact on the organ recipient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信