对奶牛的间接遗传影响进行评估

IF 3.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ida Hansson, Piter Bijma, Freddy Fikse, Lars Rönnegård
{"title":"对奶牛的间接遗传影响进行评估","authors":"Ida Hansson, Piter Bijma, Freddy Fikse, Lars Rönnegård","doi":"10.1186/s12711-025-00988-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social interactions in a dairy herd may impact an individual’s production, e.g., milk yield. These interactions can have a genetic component, so-called indirect genetic effects (IGE). IGEs contribute to heritable variation in other species, but studies on IGEs in cows are limited. Knowledge is needed on appropriate methods to monitor social interactions in cows. We evaluated with simulations whether we can estimate IGEs in cows. We used milk yield as an example trait, and we assessed how herd size, direct and indirect genetic correlations, and magnitude of IGE affected the variance component estimations and breeding value accuracies. We investigated the importance of knowing the contact intensity and direction by either including or ignoring them in the estimation model. Additionally, we investigated how random noise added to the intensities would affect the estimates and breeding values. The estimated variance components were unbiased and precise for scenarios with different herd sizes of 50, 100, or 200 cows and direct and indirect genetic correlations of either − 0.6, 0, or 0.6. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.55–0.65 for cows when the IGE explained 30% of the phenotypic variance. When the magnitude of the IGE became smaller, the precision of the estimated variances became lower. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.16–0.52 for cows when the IGE explained 1.5–15% of the phenotypic variance. Using imprecise intensities or ignoring the contact direction underestimated the variance of the indirect effects, and the breeding value accuracies became lower. Ignoring the variation in intensities in the model led to unbiased variance component estimates but a larger residual variance and lower breeding value accuracies than if we used imprecise intensities. We could estimate IGE in dairy cattle with high accuracy and precision in a simulated population of 10,000 phenotyped cows distributed over 50–200 herds. A smaller IGE variance led to less precise estimates and lower breeding value accuracies. Ignoring information about the intensity of contact in the model would be worse than using imprecise intensities, and using technology that also monitors the direction of contact may be beneficial to estimate variance components of IGE.","PeriodicalId":55120,"journal":{"name":"Genetics Selection Evolution","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle\",\"authors\":\"Ida Hansson, Piter Bijma, Freddy Fikse, Lars Rönnegård\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12711-025-00988-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social interactions in a dairy herd may impact an individual’s production, e.g., milk yield. These interactions can have a genetic component, so-called indirect genetic effects (IGE). IGEs contribute to heritable variation in other species, but studies on IGEs in cows are limited. Knowledge is needed on appropriate methods to monitor social interactions in cows. We evaluated with simulations whether we can estimate IGEs in cows. We used milk yield as an example trait, and we assessed how herd size, direct and indirect genetic correlations, and magnitude of IGE affected the variance component estimations and breeding value accuracies. We investigated the importance of knowing the contact intensity and direction by either including or ignoring them in the estimation model. Additionally, we investigated how random noise added to the intensities would affect the estimates and breeding values. The estimated variance components were unbiased and precise for scenarios with different herd sizes of 50, 100, or 200 cows and direct and indirect genetic correlations of either − 0.6, 0, or 0.6. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.55–0.65 for cows when the IGE explained 30% of the phenotypic variance. When the magnitude of the IGE became smaller, the precision of the estimated variances became lower. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.16–0.52 for cows when the IGE explained 1.5–15% of the phenotypic variance. Using imprecise intensities or ignoring the contact direction underestimated the variance of the indirect effects, and the breeding value accuracies became lower. Ignoring the variation in intensities in the model led to unbiased variance component estimates but a larger residual variance and lower breeding value accuracies than if we used imprecise intensities. We could estimate IGE in dairy cattle with high accuracy and precision in a simulated population of 10,000 phenotyped cows distributed over 50–200 herds. A smaller IGE variance led to less precise estimates and lower breeding value accuracies. Ignoring information about the intensity of contact in the model would be worse than using imprecise intensities, and using technology that also monitors the direction of contact may be beneficial to estimate variance components of IGE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics Selection Evolution\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics Selection Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-025-00988-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics Selection Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-025-00988-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奶牛群中的社会互动可能会影响个体的产量,例如产奶量。这些相互作用可能有遗传成分,即所谓的间接遗传效应(IGE)。IGEs对其他物种的遗传变异有贡献,但对奶牛IGEs的研究有限。需要掌握适当的方法来监测奶牛的社会互动。我们通过模拟来评估我们是否可以估计奶牛的IGEs。我们以产奶量为例,评估了畜群规模、直接和间接遗传相关性以及IGE的大小对方差成分估计和育种值准确性的影响。我们通过在估计模型中包括或忽略接触强度和方向来研究了解它们的重要性。此外,我们还研究了随机噪声对强度的影响对估计值和育种值的影响。对于50头、100头或200头奶牛的不同牧群规模,估计的方差成分是无偏和精确的,直接和间接遗传相关性为- 0.6、0或0.6。当IGE解释30%的表型变异时,奶牛的IGE育种值精度为0.55 ~ 0.65。当IGE的量级越小,估计方差的精度就越低。当IGE解释表型变异的1.5 ~ 15%时,奶牛的IGE育种值精度为0.16 ~ 0.52。使用不精确的强度或忽略接触方向低估了间接效应的方差,使育种值的精度降低。忽略模型中强度的变化会导致无偏方差分量估计,但与使用不精确强度相比,剩余方差更大,育种值精度更低。我们可以在分布在50-200个畜群的10,000头表现型奶牛的模拟种群中,高精度地估计奶牛的IGE。较小的IGE方差导致较不精确的估计和较低的育种值准确性。在模型中忽略有关接触强度的信息将比使用不精确的强度更糟糕,并且使用监测接触方向的技术可能有利于估计IGE的方差成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle
Social interactions in a dairy herd may impact an individual’s production, e.g., milk yield. These interactions can have a genetic component, so-called indirect genetic effects (IGE). IGEs contribute to heritable variation in other species, but studies on IGEs in cows are limited. Knowledge is needed on appropriate methods to monitor social interactions in cows. We evaluated with simulations whether we can estimate IGEs in cows. We used milk yield as an example trait, and we assessed how herd size, direct and indirect genetic correlations, and magnitude of IGE affected the variance component estimations and breeding value accuracies. We investigated the importance of knowing the contact intensity and direction by either including or ignoring them in the estimation model. Additionally, we investigated how random noise added to the intensities would affect the estimates and breeding values. The estimated variance components were unbiased and precise for scenarios with different herd sizes of 50, 100, or 200 cows and direct and indirect genetic correlations of either − 0.6, 0, or 0.6. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.55–0.65 for cows when the IGE explained 30% of the phenotypic variance. When the magnitude of the IGE became smaller, the precision of the estimated variances became lower. The IGE breeding value accuracies were 0.16–0.52 for cows when the IGE explained 1.5–15% of the phenotypic variance. Using imprecise intensities or ignoring the contact direction underestimated the variance of the indirect effects, and the breeding value accuracies became lower. Ignoring the variation in intensities in the model led to unbiased variance component estimates but a larger residual variance and lower breeding value accuracies than if we used imprecise intensities. We could estimate IGE in dairy cattle with high accuracy and precision in a simulated population of 10,000 phenotyped cows distributed over 50–200 herds. A smaller IGE variance led to less precise estimates and lower breeding value accuracies. Ignoring information about the intensity of contact in the model would be worse than using imprecise intensities, and using technology that also monitors the direction of contact may be beneficial to estimate variance components of IGE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics Selection Evolution
Genetics Selection Evolution 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
74
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Genetics Selection Evolution invites basic, applied and methodological content that will aid the current understanding and the utilization of genetic variability in domestic animal species. Although the focus is on domestic animal species, research on other species is invited if it contributes to the understanding of the use of genetic variability in domestic animals. Genetics Selection Evolution publishes results from all levels of study, from the gene to the quantitative trait, from the individual to the population, the breed or the species. Contributions concerning both the biological approach, from molecular genetics to quantitative genetics, as well as the mathematical approach, from population genetics to statistics, are welcome. Specific areas of interest include but are not limited to: gene and QTL identification, mapping and characterization, analysis of new phenotypes, high-throughput SNP data analysis, functional genomics, cytogenetics, genetic diversity of populations and breeds, genetic evaluation, applied and experimental selection, genomic selection, selection efficiency, and statistical methodology for the genetic analysis of phenotypes with quantitative and mixed inheritance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信