{"title":"中等ER表达的乳腺肿瘤在生物学上不同于低ER表达的肿瘤,预后更佳。","authors":"Yuko Ueki, Yoshiya Horimoto, Kazuharu Harada, Yumiko Ushiyama, Yumiko Ishizuka, Hiroko Onagi, Takuo Hayashi, Tsuyoshi Saito, Takahiko Kawate, Takashi Ishikawa, Junichiro Watanabe, Goro Kutomi","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01745-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer exhibits a widely recognized bimodal distribution, with increasing focus on the biological and clinical characteristics of the low-expression group. However, tumors with intermediate ER expression have been relatively understudied. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic features of ER-intermediate (ER-int) tumors by comparing them with ER-low tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tumors were classified into ER-low (1-10%), ER-int (11-70%), and ER-high (71-100%) groups based on immunohistochemistry. We retrospectively analyzed 261 breast cancer patients with ER-low or ER-int tumors who underwent curative surgery. Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes were compared, and factors influencing distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. For analysis of clinical outcomes, after excluding HER2-positive tumors, an additional cohort of 604 patients with ER-high and HER2-negative tumors was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER-int tumors showed lower nuclear grade, higher progesterone receptor expression, and lower Ki67 labeling index compared with ER-low tumors. Pathological stage was independently associated with both DRFS and OS. In addition, ER status was also an independent factor for OS, with ER-int tumors showing significantly better OS than ER-low tumors (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings, based on comparison with ER-low tumors, suggest that intermediate ER expression may represent a biologically and clinically heterogeneous subgroup within ER-positive breast cancers. Recognition of this heterogeneity could help refine classification and support more individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast tumors with intermediate ER expression differ biologically from ER-low tumors and exhibit a more favorable prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuko Ueki, Yoshiya Horimoto, Kazuharu Harada, Yumiko Ushiyama, Yumiko Ishizuka, Hiroko Onagi, Takuo Hayashi, Tsuyoshi Saito, Takahiko Kawate, Takashi Ishikawa, Junichiro Watanabe, Goro Kutomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-025-01745-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer exhibits a widely recognized bimodal distribution, with increasing focus on the biological and clinical characteristics of the low-expression group. However, tumors with intermediate ER expression have been relatively understudied. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic features of ER-intermediate (ER-int) tumors by comparing them with ER-low tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tumors were classified into ER-low (1-10%), ER-int (11-70%), and ER-high (71-100%) groups based on immunohistochemistry. We retrospectively analyzed 261 breast cancer patients with ER-low or ER-int tumors who underwent curative surgery. Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes were compared, and factors influencing distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. For analysis of clinical outcomes, after excluding HER2-positive tumors, an additional cohort of 604 patients with ER-high and HER2-negative tumors was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER-int tumors showed lower nuclear grade, higher progesterone receptor expression, and lower Ki67 labeling index compared with ER-low tumors. Pathological stage was independently associated with both DRFS and OS. In addition, ER status was also an independent factor for OS, with ER-int tumors showing significantly better OS than ER-low tumors (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings, based on comparison with ER-low tumors, suggest that intermediate ER expression may represent a biologically and clinically heterogeneous subgroup within ER-positive breast cancers. Recognition of this heterogeneity could help refine classification and support more individualized treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01745-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01745-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast tumors with intermediate ER expression differ biologically from ER-low tumors and exhibit a more favorable prognosis.
Background: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer exhibits a widely recognized bimodal distribution, with increasing focus on the biological and clinical characteristics of the low-expression group. However, tumors with intermediate ER expression have been relatively understudied. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic features of ER-intermediate (ER-int) tumors by comparing them with ER-low tumors.
Methods: Tumors were classified into ER-low (1-10%), ER-int (11-70%), and ER-high (71-100%) groups based on immunohistochemistry. We retrospectively analyzed 261 breast cancer patients with ER-low or ER-int tumors who underwent curative surgery. Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes were compared, and factors influencing distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. For analysis of clinical outcomes, after excluding HER2-positive tumors, an additional cohort of 604 patients with ER-high and HER2-negative tumors was also compared.
Results: ER-int tumors showed lower nuclear grade, higher progesterone receptor expression, and lower Ki67 labeling index compared with ER-low tumors. Pathological stage was independently associated with both DRFS and OS. In addition, ER status was also an independent factor for OS, with ER-int tumors showing significantly better OS than ER-low tumors (P = 0.014).
Conclusions: Our findings, based on comparison with ER-low tumors, suggest that intermediate ER expression may represent a biologically and clinically heterogeneous subgroup within ER-positive breast cancers. Recognition of this heterogeneity could help refine classification and support more individualized treatment strategies.