评估腓骨钉入对关节软骨和跟腓骨韧带的危害:一项尸体研究。

IF 2.2
Hirbod Abootalebi, William Mayer, Erin Bigney, Siyum Mohiuddin, Xiuming Shi, Madeline Power, Jacob Matz
{"title":"评估腓骨钉入对关节软骨和跟腓骨韧带的危害:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Hirbod Abootalebi, William Mayer, Erin Bigney, Siyum Mohiuddin, Xiuming Shi, Madeline Power, Jacob Matz","doi":"10.1177/10711007251351314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures with plates and screws carries risks such as wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing provides a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Although prior studies have examined the risk posed by fibular nailing to the peroneal tendons and nerves, data remained limited regarding its impact on other adjacent structures especially the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the articular cartilage of the distal fibula, structures whose injury could contribute to joint instability, persistent pain, or degenerative change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed the risk and extent of damage to anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 cadaveric lower extremities. Risks were categorized based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus, peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0-5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1-10 mm), or low-risk (>10 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macroscopic evaluation identified the CFL, ATFL, and PB as high-risk structures. The CFL was damaged in 3 of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of its width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) fell in the high-risk range, although no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and reliable option for treating ankle fractures. However, attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons. Although cartilage was always spared in this cadaveric study, its proximity warrants surgical caution.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings clarify the soft tissue risks associated with IM nailing and may provide guidance for orthopaedic surgeons and patient discussions, emphasizing the importance of proper technique to preserve soft tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"10711007251351314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Risk to Articular Cartilage and the Calcaneofibular Ligament During Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hirbod Abootalebi, William Mayer, Erin Bigney, Siyum Mohiuddin, Xiuming Shi, Madeline Power, Jacob Matz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251351314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures with plates and screws carries risks such as wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing provides a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Although prior studies have examined the risk posed by fibular nailing to the peroneal tendons and nerves, data remained limited regarding its impact on other adjacent structures especially the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the articular cartilage of the distal fibula, structures whose injury could contribute to joint instability, persistent pain, or degenerative change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed the risk and extent of damage to anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 cadaveric lower extremities. Risks were categorized based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus, peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0-5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1-10 mm), or low-risk (>10 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Macroscopic evaluation identified the CFL, ATFL, and PB as high-risk structures. The CFL was damaged in 3 of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of its width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) fell in the high-risk range, although no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and reliable option for treating ankle fractures. However, attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons. Although cartilage was always spared in this cadaveric study, its proximity warrants surgical caution.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings clarify the soft tissue risks associated with IM nailing and may provide guidance for orthopaedic surgeons and patient discussions, emphasizing the importance of proper technique to preserve soft tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10711007251351314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251351314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251351314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统的踝关节骨折手术用钢板和螺钉固定存在伤口并发症、硬体突出和软组织刺激等风险。髓内(IM)腓骨内钉提供了一种微创的选择,潜在的并发症发生率较低。虽然先前的研究已经检查了腓骨钉入对腓骨肌腱和神经的风险,但关于其对其他邻近结构的影响,特别是跟腓骨韧带(CFL)和腓骨远端关节软骨的影响,数据仍然有限,这些结构的损伤可能导致关节不稳定、持续疼痛或退行性变化。方法:本研究评估了10例尸体下肢IM钉内固定时解剖结构损伤的风险和程度。根据指甲到CFL、距腓骨前韧带(ATFL)、腓肠神经(SN)、腓浅神经(SPN)、腓骨长肌、腓骨短肌(PB)和关节软骨的距离对风险进行分类:高风险(0- 5mm)、中度风险(5.1- 10mm)或低风险(bbb10 mm)。结果:经宏观评价,CFL、ATFL和PB为高危结构。10个试件中有3个试件的CFL损伤,损伤幅度在14% ~ 64%之间。尽管关节软骨、ATFL、SN或SPN未见明显损伤,但与CFL (1.20 mm)、ATFL (3.43 mm)、PB (3.19 mm)和关节软骨(3.45 mm)的平均距离均降至高危范围。结论:本研究进一步证实了IM腓骨内钉是治疗踝关节骨折的一种安全可靠的选择。然而,应注意潜在的医源性损伤高危软组织结构,特别是CFL和腓骨肌腱。虽然在这个尸体研究中软骨总是被保留,但它的邻近需要手术谨慎。临床意义:这些发现阐明了IM钉入对软组织的风险,并可能为骨科医生和患者讨论提供指导,强调了适当技术保护软组织的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Risk to Articular Cartilage and the Calcaneofibular Ligament During Fibular Nailing: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Traditional surgical fixation of ankle fractures with plates and screws carries risks such as wound complications, hardware prominence, and soft tissue irritation. Intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing provides a minimally invasive alternative with potentially lower complication rates. Although prior studies have examined the risk posed by fibular nailing to the peroneal tendons and nerves, data remained limited regarding its impact on other adjacent structures especially the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the articular cartilage of the distal fibula, structures whose injury could contribute to joint instability, persistent pain, or degenerative change.

Methods: This study assessed the risk and extent of damage to anatomical structures during IM nail fixation on 10 cadaveric lower extremities. Risks were categorized based on distances from the nail to the CFL, anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), sural nerve (SN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), peroneus longus, peroneus brevis (PB), and articular cartilage: high-risk (0-5 mm), moderate-risk (5.1-10 mm), or low-risk (>10 mm).

Results: Macroscopic evaluation identified the CFL, ATFL, and PB as high-risk structures. The CFL was damaged in 3 of 10 specimens, ranging from 14% to 64% of its width. The average distances to the CFL (1.20 mm), ATFL (3.43 mm), PB (3.19 mm), and articular cartilage (3.45 mm) fell in the high-risk range, although no significant damage was observed to the articular cartilage, ATFL, SN, or SPN.

Conclusion: This study further confirms that IM fibular nailing is a generally safe and reliable option for treating ankle fractures. However, attention should be given to the potential for iatrogenic damage to high-risk soft-tissue structures, particularly the CFL and peroneal tendons. Although cartilage was always spared in this cadaveric study, its proximity warrants surgical caution.

Clinical relevance: These findings clarify the soft tissue risks associated with IM nailing and may provide guidance for orthopaedic surgeons and patient discussions, emphasizing the importance of proper technique to preserve soft tissues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信