{"title":"西布曲明类似物的安全性药理学评价与体外生物靶点筛选。","authors":"Michael F. Santillo, Robert L. Sprando","doi":"10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many weight loss products marketed as foods and dietary supplements are adulterated with structurally modified versions (analogues) of sibutramine, a weight loss drug withdrawn from the market due to adverse effects in the heart and nervous system. Unlike sibutramine, its analogues lack <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> safety data. Therefore, to identify potential health effects of sibutramine analogues, binding was predicted and measured between sibutramine analogues and a panel of 45 safety-related biological targets (e.g., receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes) related to the heart, nervous system, and other organs. Target binding concentrations (K<sub>i</sub>) were predicted <em>in silico</em> based upon quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and measured <em>in vitro</em> by competitive ligand binding assays. The <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in silico</em> K<sub>i</sub> values closely agreed for transporters of serotonin (SERT), norepinephrine (NET), and dopamine (DAT), which are linked to adverse health effects in the heart and nervous system. The chloro, homo, and desmethylsibutramine analogues exhibited similar binding profiles and particularly potent binding to SERT, NET and DAT (K<sub>i</sub>, 9–403 nM). However, despite structural similarity among the compounds, benzyl and formyl analogues exhibited weaker binding to nearly all targets evaluated (K<sub>i</sub>, 0.447 to >10 μM). Additionally, for selected analogues, target binding was predicted for metabolites; a majority of metabolites (70 %) exhibited similar binding potency (K<sub>i</sub> within 10-fold) to their respective parent chemicals, suggesting they may also contribute to potential health effects. Overall, biological target binding profiles illustrate important structure-activity relationships among sibutramine analogues that can help identify potential adverse health effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":274,"journal":{"name":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","volume":"420 ","pages":"Article 111669"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety pharmacology of sibutramine analogues evaluated by in silico and in vitro biological target screening\",\"authors\":\"Michael F. Santillo, Robert L. Sprando\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many weight loss products marketed as foods and dietary supplements are adulterated with structurally modified versions (analogues) of sibutramine, a weight loss drug withdrawn from the market due to adverse effects in the heart and nervous system. Unlike sibutramine, its analogues lack <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> safety data. Therefore, to identify potential health effects of sibutramine analogues, binding was predicted and measured between sibutramine analogues and a panel of 45 safety-related biological targets (e.g., receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes) related to the heart, nervous system, and other organs. Target binding concentrations (K<sub>i</sub>) were predicted <em>in silico</em> based upon quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and measured <em>in vitro</em> by competitive ligand binding assays. The <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in silico</em> K<sub>i</sub> values closely agreed for transporters of serotonin (SERT), norepinephrine (NET), and dopamine (DAT), which are linked to adverse health effects in the heart and nervous system. The chloro, homo, and desmethylsibutramine analogues exhibited similar binding profiles and particularly potent binding to SERT, NET and DAT (K<sub>i</sub>, 9–403 nM). However, despite structural similarity among the compounds, benzyl and formyl analogues exhibited weaker binding to nearly all targets evaluated (K<sub>i</sub>, 0.447 to >10 μM). Additionally, for selected analogues, target binding was predicted for metabolites; a majority of metabolites (70 %) exhibited similar binding potency (K<sub>i</sub> within 10-fold) to their respective parent chemicals, suggesting they may also contribute to potential health effects. Overall, biological target binding profiles illustrate important structure-activity relationships among sibutramine analogues that can help identify potential adverse health effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemico-Biological Interactions\",\"volume\":\"420 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemico-Biological Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279725002996\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279725002996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety pharmacology of sibutramine analogues evaluated by in silico and in vitro biological target screening
Many weight loss products marketed as foods and dietary supplements are adulterated with structurally modified versions (analogues) of sibutramine, a weight loss drug withdrawn from the market due to adverse effects in the heart and nervous system. Unlike sibutramine, its analogues lack in vitro and in vivo safety data. Therefore, to identify potential health effects of sibutramine analogues, binding was predicted and measured between sibutramine analogues and a panel of 45 safety-related biological targets (e.g., receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes) related to the heart, nervous system, and other organs. Target binding concentrations (Ki) were predicted in silico based upon quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and measured in vitro by competitive ligand binding assays. The in vitro and in silico Ki values closely agreed for transporters of serotonin (SERT), norepinephrine (NET), and dopamine (DAT), which are linked to adverse health effects in the heart and nervous system. The chloro, homo, and desmethylsibutramine analogues exhibited similar binding profiles and particularly potent binding to SERT, NET and DAT (Ki, 9–403 nM). However, despite structural similarity among the compounds, benzyl and formyl analogues exhibited weaker binding to nearly all targets evaluated (Ki, 0.447 to >10 μM). Additionally, for selected analogues, target binding was predicted for metabolites; a majority of metabolites (70 %) exhibited similar binding potency (Ki within 10-fold) to their respective parent chemicals, suggesting they may also contribute to potential health effects. Overall, biological target binding profiles illustrate important structure-activity relationships among sibutramine analogues that can help identify potential adverse health effects.
期刊介绍:
Chemico-Biological Interactions publishes research reports and review articles that examine the molecular, cellular, and/or biochemical basis of toxicologically relevant outcomes. Special emphasis is placed on toxicological mechanisms associated with interactions between chemicals and biological systems. Outcomes may include all traditional endpoints caused by synthetic or naturally occurring chemicals, both in vivo and in vitro. Endpoints of interest include, but are not limited to carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, respiratory toxicology, neurotoxicology, reproductive and developmental toxicology, and immunotoxicology.