在接受关节镜下关节松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的患者中,确定临床有意义的变化和患者报告的预后指标改善的预测因素。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hui Ben, Ik Jae Jung, In-Ho Jeon
{"title":"在接受关节镜下关节松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的患者中,确定临床有意义的变化和患者报告的预后指标改善的预测因素。","authors":"Hui Ben, Ik Jae Jung, In-Ho Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically meaningful outcome thresholds, including patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB), have rarely been evaluated after arthroscopic arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. This study therefore aimed to determine PASS, MCID, and SCB values for the pain Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and range-of-motion difference (ROMD) after arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-five patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively using anchor-based methods for PASS and SCB, and a distribution-based method for MCID. Anchor questions were used to define clinically meaningful thresholds. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of improvement for surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four measures demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (area under the curve >0.70) for PASS and SCB. The PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were 2.5, 1.2, and 2.5 for pVAS; 65.0, 11.9, and 12.5 for SANE; 87.5, 9.5, and 17.5 for MEPS; and 113, 15, and 58 for ROMD. Lower preoperative scores were associated with significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving all thresholds. Longer symptom duration and the presence of ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly lower ORs for achieving PASS for SANE. Younger age was significantly associated with achieving higher odds ratios (ORs) for PASS for MEPS. For ROMD, younger age, shorter symptom duration, lower BMI, and the presence of preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly higher ORs for achieving PASS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis, reliable PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were identified for pVAS, SANE, MEPS, and ROMD. Favorable outcomes were more likely in patients with poorer preoperative scores, younger age, lower BMI, and shorter symptom duration, while preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were negatively associated with achieving PASS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Clinically Meaningful Changes and Predictors of Improvement for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients who Undergo Arthroscopic Arthrolysis of Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Ben, Ik Jae Jung, In-Ho Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically meaningful outcome thresholds, including patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB), have rarely been evaluated after arthroscopic arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. This study therefore aimed to determine PASS, MCID, and SCB values for the pain Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and range-of-motion difference (ROMD) after arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-five patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively using anchor-based methods for PASS and SCB, and a distribution-based method for MCID. Anchor questions were used to define clinically meaningful thresholds. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of improvement for surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four measures demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (area under the curve >0.70) for PASS and SCB. The PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were 2.5, 1.2, and 2.5 for pVAS; 65.0, 11.9, and 12.5 for SANE; 87.5, 9.5, and 17.5 for MEPS; and 113, 15, and 58 for ROMD. Lower preoperative scores were associated with significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving all thresholds. Longer symptom duration and the presence of ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly lower ORs for achieving PASS for SANE. Younger age was significantly associated with achieving higher odds ratios (ORs) for PASS for MEPS. For ROMD, younger age, shorter symptom duration, lower BMI, and the presence of preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly higher ORs for achieving PASS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis, reliable PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were identified for pVAS, SANE, MEPS, and ROMD. Favorable outcomes were more likely in patients with poorer preoperative scores, younger age, lower BMI, and shorter symptom duration, while preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were negatively associated with achieving PASS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有临床意义的结局阈值,包括患者可接受症状状态(PASS)、最小临床重要差异(MCID)和实质性临床获益(SCB),很少在关节镜下关节松解治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬后进行评估。因此,本研究旨在确定关节镜下肘关节松解术后疼痛视觉模拟量表(pVAS)、单一评估数值评估(SANE)、Mayo肘关节表现评分(MEPS)和活动范围差(ROMD)的PASS、MCID和SCB值。方法:65例接受关节镜下肘关节松解术的患者在术后至少1年使用基于锚定的方法评估PASS和SCB,以及基于分布的方法评估MCID。锚定问题用于定义有临床意义的阈值。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定手术结果改善的预测因素。结果:四种测量方法对PASS和SCB均表现出可接受的判别能力(曲线下面积>0.70)。pVAS的PASS、MCID和SCB阈值分别为2.5、1.2和2.5;65.0, 11.9和12.5为SANE;MEPS为87.5、9.5、17.5;113、15和58用于ROMD。较低的术前评分与达到所有阈值的显著较高的优势比(or)相关。较长的症状持续时间和尺神经症状的存在与实现SANE PASS的显著较低的or相关。年龄越小,MEPS患者PASS的优势比(or)越高。对于ROMD,较年轻的年龄、较短的症状持续时间、较低的BMI和术前尺神经症状的存在与实现PASS的高or相关。结论:关节镜下肘关节松解后,确定了pVAS、SANE、MEPS和ROMD的可靠PASS、MCID和SCB阈值。术前评分较差、年龄较小、BMI较低、症状持续时间较短的患者更有可能获得良好的预后,而术前尺神经症状与PASS的实现呈负相关。证据等级:三级;回顾性队列比较;预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Clinically Meaningful Changes and Predictors of Improvement for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients who Undergo Arthroscopic Arthrolysis of Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness.

Background: Clinically meaningful outcome thresholds, including patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB), have rarely been evaluated after arthroscopic arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. This study therefore aimed to determine PASS, MCID, and SCB values for the pain Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and range-of-motion difference (ROMD) after arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis.

Methods: Sixty-five patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively using anchor-based methods for PASS and SCB, and a distribution-based method for MCID. Anchor questions were used to define clinically meaningful thresholds. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of improvement for surgical outcomes.

Results: All four measures demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (area under the curve >0.70) for PASS and SCB. The PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were 2.5, 1.2, and 2.5 for pVAS; 65.0, 11.9, and 12.5 for SANE; 87.5, 9.5, and 17.5 for MEPS; and 113, 15, and 58 for ROMD. Lower preoperative scores were associated with significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving all thresholds. Longer symptom duration and the presence of ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly lower ORs for achieving PASS for SANE. Younger age was significantly associated with achieving higher odds ratios (ORs) for PASS for MEPS. For ROMD, younger age, shorter symptom duration, lower BMI, and the presence of preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were associated with significantly higher ORs for achieving PASS.

Conclusion: After arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis, reliable PASS, MCID, and SCB thresholds were identified for pVAS, SANE, MEPS, and ROMD. Favorable outcomes were more likely in patients with poorer preoperative scores, younger age, lower BMI, and shorter symptom duration, while preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were negatively associated with achieving PASS.

Level of evidence: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信