{"title":"加巴喷丁类药物治疗脊髓损伤后神经性疼痛:一项随机对照试验的最新meta分析。","authors":"Rafael Batista João, Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas, Aníbal Valencia Vasquez, Sanjana Thota, Julyana Medeiros Dantas","doi":"10.1111/papr.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD -1.75; 95% CI: -3.23 to -0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD -0.99; 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 7","pages":"e70060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gabapentinoids for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Batista João, Jilly Octoria Tagore Chan, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Genesis Pamela Mora Rosas, Aníbal Valencia Vasquez, Sanjana Thota, Julyana Medeiros Dantas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papr.70060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD -1.75; 95% CI: -3.23 to -0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD -0.99; 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"e70060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabapentinoids for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Background and aim: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic symptoms such as central neuropathic pain (CNP) and its related complications. Gabapentinoids are often used in the treatment of post-SCI CNP; however, the optimal management of this condition is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentinoids compared with placebo in post-SCI patients affected by CNP.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin, pregabalin, or mirogabalin) with placebo in post-SCI patients experiencing CNP. We calculated mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pain was measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.
Results: We included 5 RCTs comprising 682 patients. The mean age was 50.2 years, and 83.8% were male. When compared with placebo, patients treated with gabapentinoids experienced a significant decrease in average daily pain (MD -1.75; 95% CI: -3.23 to -0.28; p = 0.02) and pain-related sleep interference (MD -0.99; 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.60; p < 0.001). Additionally, there were higher proportions of individuals with pain intensity relief ≥ 50% (RR 2.19; 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.25; p < 0.001) and with at least some perceived improvement on the clinical global impression scale (RR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.18, p < 0.001) in the gabapentinoids group compared to the placebo group. However, treatment with gabapentinoids was associated with a significantly increased risk of blurred vision (RR 8.55; 95% CI: 1.53 to 47.7; p = 0.02), somnolence (RR 3.77; 95% CI: 2.44 to 5.84; p < 0.001), peripheral edema (RR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.37 to 5.99; p < 0.01), and dizziness (RR 2.83; 95% CI: 1.67 to 4.78; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating patients with CNP following SCI, gabapentinoids were associated with significant improvements in pain and pain-related sleep interference compared with placebo. Nonetheless, gabapentinoids significantly increased the risk of adverse events.
期刊介绍:
Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.