一种简化的深静脉血栓诊断算法的验证。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Sasha Sharma, Linnea Soon, Kerstin de Wit, Sangita Sharma, Marc Afilalo, Grégoire Le Gal, Sudeep Shivakumar, Shannon M Bates, Cynthia Wu, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Frederick D' Aragon, Jean-Francois Deshaies, Sameer Parpia
{"title":"一种简化的深静脉血栓诊断算法的验证。","authors":"Sasha Sharma, Linnea Soon, Kerstin de Wit, Sangita Sharma, Marc Afilalo, Grégoire Le Gal, Sudeep Shivakumar, Shannon M Bates, Cynthia Wu, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Frederick D' Aragon, Jean-Francois Deshaies, Sameer Parpia","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnostic algorithms are rarely followed in clinical practice due to complexity and time constraints. Simplified alternatives are needed to enhance adherence while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. The ToDay algorithm was developed to address these concerns by combining physician implicit assessment of DVT likelihood with D-dimer testing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the study is to validate the ToDay algorithm using previously collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis used data from the 4D study (NCT02038530), a multicenter study evaluating DVT diagnostic strategies. The ToDay algorithm considers DVT excluded without further testing if DVT is considered most likely and D-dimer <500 ng/mL or if DVT is not considered most likely and D-dimer less than age-adjusted threshold. The primary outcome was 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Secondary outcome was not requiring ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1497 patients, 163 (10.9%) were diagnosed with DVT. Of the 1334 patients who had DVT excluded by the ToDay algorithm, 10 patients were found to have VTE during follow-up, a failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI, 0.41-1.37). Of all patients, 38.6% (95% CI, 36.2-41.1) did not require ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ToDay algorithm was found to be a safe and efficient alternative for DVT testing, reducing reliance on ultrasound imaging. It simplifies the diagnostic process, making it more feasible for emergency settings. Prospective validation is required before clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the ToDay, a simplified diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis.\",\"authors\":\"Sasha Sharma, Linnea Soon, Kerstin de Wit, Sangita Sharma, Marc Afilalo, Grégoire Le Gal, Sudeep Shivakumar, Shannon M Bates, Cynthia Wu, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Frederick D' Aragon, Jean-Francois Deshaies, Sameer Parpia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnostic algorithms are rarely followed in clinical practice due to complexity and time constraints. Simplified alternatives are needed to enhance adherence while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. The ToDay algorithm was developed to address these concerns by combining physician implicit assessment of DVT likelihood with D-dimer testing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the study is to validate the ToDay algorithm using previously collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis used data from the 4D study (NCT02038530), a multicenter study evaluating DVT diagnostic strategies. The ToDay algorithm considers DVT excluded without further testing if DVT is considered most likely and D-dimer <500 ng/mL or if DVT is not considered most likely and D-dimer less than age-adjusted threshold. The primary outcome was 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Secondary outcome was not requiring ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1497 patients, 163 (10.9%) were diagnosed with DVT. Of the 1334 patients who had DVT excluded by the ToDay algorithm, 10 patients were found to have VTE during follow-up, a failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI, 0.41-1.37). Of all patients, 38.6% (95% CI, 36.2-41.1) did not require ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ToDay algorithm was found to be a safe and efficient alternative for DVT testing, reducing reliance on ultrasound imaging. It simplifies the diagnostic process, making it more feasible for emergency settings. Prospective validation is required before clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的深静脉血栓(DVT)诊断算法由于复杂性和时间的限制,在临床实践中很少采用。需要简化的替代方案来提高依从性,同时保持诊断的准确性。ToDay算法通过将医生对DVT可能性的隐性评估与d -二聚体检测相结合来解决这些问题。方法:本分析使用来自4D研究(NCT02038530)的数据,这是一项评估DVT诊断策略的多中心研究。如果DVT被认为是最可能的,d -二聚体低于500 ng/mL,或者如果DVT不被认为是最可能的,d -二聚体低于年龄调整阈值,ToDay算法认为DVT被排除,而无需进一步测试。主要终点是90天的症状性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)。次要结果不需要超声成像。结果:1497例患者中,163例(10.9%)被诊断为DVT。在ToDay算法排除DVT的1334例患者中,随访期间发现10例患者有VTE,失败率为0.75%(95%置信区间(CI): 0.41-1.37)。在所有患者中,38.6% (95% CI: 36.2-41.1)不需要超声成像。结论:ToDay算法是一种安全有效的DVT检测方法,减少了对超声成像的依赖。它简化了诊断,使其更适用于紧急情况。在临床应用前需要进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the ToDay, a simplified diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis.

Background: The current deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnostic algorithms are rarely followed in clinical practice due to complexity and time constraints. Simplified alternatives are needed to enhance adherence while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. The ToDay algorithm was developed to address these concerns by combining physician implicit assessment of DVT likelihood with D-dimer testing.

Objectives: The objective of the study is to validate the ToDay algorithm using previously collected data.

Methods: This analysis used data from the 4D study (NCT02038530), a multicenter study evaluating DVT diagnostic strategies. The ToDay algorithm considers DVT excluded without further testing if DVT is considered most likely and D-dimer <500 ng/mL or if DVT is not considered most likely and D-dimer less than age-adjusted threshold. The primary outcome was 90-day symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Secondary outcome was not requiring ultrasound imaging.

Results: Among 1497 patients, 163 (10.9%) were diagnosed with DVT. Of the 1334 patients who had DVT excluded by the ToDay algorithm, 10 patients were found to have VTE during follow-up, a failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI, 0.41-1.37). Of all patients, 38.6% (95% CI, 36.2-41.1) did not require ultrasound imaging.

Conclusion: The ToDay algorithm was found to be a safe and efficient alternative for DVT testing, reducing reliance on ultrasound imaging. It simplifies the diagnostic process, making it more feasible for emergency settings. Prospective validation is required before clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信