Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi
{"title":"贝兰他单抗暴露后复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的序贯bcma定向治疗的真实世界结果","authors":"Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.
Background: While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.
Methods: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.
Results: The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).
Conclusion: Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.