贝兰他单抗暴露后复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的序贯bcma定向治疗的真实世界结果

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi
{"title":"贝兰他单抗暴露后复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的序贯bcma定向治疗的真实世界结果","authors":"Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Prerna Mewawalla, Rachel Dileo, Yue Yin, Christopher Strouse, Hira Shaikh, James A Davis, Omar Alkharabsheh, Aliya Rashid, Nausheen Ahmed, Al-Ola Abdallah, Hamza Hashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)导向疗法越来越多地用于多发性骨髓瘤,但BCMA导向疗法序次治疗的结果仍然是一个积极研究的领域。方法:在这项多中心回顾性分析中,我们评估了接受bcma定向治疗(包括CAR - T和双特异性抗体(BsAb))的患者在使用抗体-药物偶联贝兰他单抗马夫多汀后的实际结果。共有23例患者(14例CAR - T, 9例BsAb)被纳入分析。结果:患者的中位年龄为68岁(范围37-82岁),43%患有高危细胞遗传学,87%接受过≥4种既往治疗,35%在治疗时患有髓外疾病。整个人群的总缓解率(ORR)为65%,BsAb为44%,CAR - T亚组为79%。中位随访时间为24个月,中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为5个月(范围2-10)和28个月(范围16-NR)。接受BsAb和CAR - T治疗的患者之间的中位PFS没有差异(p=0.8),或者基于贝兰他单抗到BCMA治疗的时间(结论:贝兰他单抗进展后,使用BCMA指导的BsAb或CAR - T治疗仍然是可行的。然而,与先前没有BCMA暴露的患者相比,结果仍然较差,并且不受治疗选择或距离上次BCMA暴露时间的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.

Background: While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.

Results: The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received ≥4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs ≥6 months, p=0.8).

Conclusion: Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信