不同的结构和数量染色体异常决定弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的MYC状态,并有助于与伯基特淋巴瘤区分:使用无监督和人工智能驱动的预测模型的细胞遗传学数据分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Rolando García, Shankar Srinivasan, Mehta Shashi, Frederick Coffman, Prasad Koduru
{"title":"不同的结构和数量染色体异常决定弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的MYC状态,并有助于与伯基特淋巴瘤区分:使用无监督和人工智能驱动的预测模型的细胞遗传学数据分析。","authors":"Rolando García, Shankar Srinivasan, Mehta Shashi, Frederick Coffman, Prasad Koduru","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06508-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to identify recurrent chromosome abnormalities (RCAs) to distinguish these entities and to test their specificities in a set of predictor models. The study analyzed publicly available cytogenetic data to construct models to predict DLBCL and BL. The Fisher Exact test (2-tail) was used to assess the significance of differences in the number of aberrations between groups, as well as to determine correlations between RCAs and the two entities. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Discrimination analysis was determined by the receiver operating curve (ROC). All analyses were performed using the R package. The SAS software package was used to develop a logistic regression model. Two subsequent supervised models were constructed using a larger dataset (n = 515) to confirm initial findings. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Several RCAs were associated with DLBCL, including 1p-, 1q-, -2, + 3, -4, + 5, 6p gain, 6q-, + 7, -8, 9q-, -10/-15, -10/-14, + 11, +12, 14q-, 15q-, + 16, 16q-,17p-, + 18, 19p-, and 22q-. Of these, + 7, 15q-, + 16 and + 18 were more prevalent in MYC + DLBCL vs. BL, whereas 1q gain and 13q- were consistent with BL. The specificity of supervised models ranged from 90 to 100%, whereas the accuracy of the unsupervised logistic regression model was 85%. Our findings revealed unique RCAs that may be used in combination with model classifiers to augment diagnostic accuracy and help clinicians better manage these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities determine the MYC status in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma and help differentiate from Burkitt lymphoma: a cytogenetic data analysis using unsupervised and AI-driven prediction models.\",\"authors\":\"Rolando García, Shankar Srinivasan, Mehta Shashi, Frederick Coffman, Prasad Koduru\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06508-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to identify recurrent chromosome abnormalities (RCAs) to distinguish these entities and to test their specificities in a set of predictor models. The study analyzed publicly available cytogenetic data to construct models to predict DLBCL and BL. The Fisher Exact test (2-tail) was used to assess the significance of differences in the number of aberrations between groups, as well as to determine correlations between RCAs and the two entities. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Discrimination analysis was determined by the receiver operating curve (ROC). All analyses were performed using the R package. The SAS software package was used to develop a logistic regression model. Two subsequent supervised models were constructed using a larger dataset (n = 515) to confirm initial findings. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Several RCAs were associated with DLBCL, including 1p-, 1q-, -2, + 3, -4, + 5, 6p gain, 6q-, + 7, -8, 9q-, -10/-15, -10/-14, + 11, +12, 14q-, 15q-, + 16, 16q-,17p-, + 18, 19p-, and 22q-. Of these, + 7, 15q-, + 16 and + 18 were more prevalent in MYC + DLBCL vs. BL, whereas 1q gain and 13q- were consistent with BL. The specificity of supervised models ranged from 90 to 100%, whereas the accuracy of the unsupervised logistic regression model was 85%. Our findings revealed unique RCAs that may be used in combination with model classifiers to augment diagnostic accuracy and help clinicians better manage these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06508-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06508-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是识别复发性染色体异常(RCAs),以区分这些实体,并在一组预测模型中测试它们的特异性。该研究分析了公开可用的细胞遗传学数据,以构建预测DLBCL和BL的模型。Fisher精确检验(双尾)用于评估组间畸变数量差异的显著性,以及确定RCAs与两种实体之间的相关性。p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。判别分析采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)。所有分析均使用R软件包进行。采用SAS软件包建立logistic回归模型。随后使用更大的数据集(n = 515)构建了两个监督模型,以证实最初的发现。一个假定值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinct structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities determine the MYC status in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma and help differentiate from Burkitt lymphoma: a cytogenetic data analysis using unsupervised and AI-driven prediction models.

The aim of this study was to identify recurrent chromosome abnormalities (RCAs) to distinguish these entities and to test their specificities in a set of predictor models. The study analyzed publicly available cytogenetic data to construct models to predict DLBCL and BL. The Fisher Exact test (2-tail) was used to assess the significance of differences in the number of aberrations between groups, as well as to determine correlations between RCAs and the two entities. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Discrimination analysis was determined by the receiver operating curve (ROC). All analyses were performed using the R package. The SAS software package was used to develop a logistic regression model. Two subsequent supervised models were constructed using a larger dataset (n = 515) to confirm initial findings. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Several RCAs were associated with DLBCL, including 1p-, 1q-, -2, + 3, -4, + 5, 6p gain, 6q-, + 7, -8, 9q-, -10/-15, -10/-14, + 11, +12, 14q-, 15q-, + 16, 16q-,17p-, + 18, 19p-, and 22q-. Of these, + 7, 15q-, + 16 and + 18 were more prevalent in MYC + DLBCL vs. BL, whereas 1q gain and 13q- were consistent with BL. The specificity of supervised models ranged from 90 to 100%, whereas the accuracy of the unsupervised logistic regression model was 85%. Our findings revealed unique RCAs that may be used in combination with model classifiers to augment diagnostic accuracy and help clinicians better manage these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信