新诊断的高风险局部或转移性激素敏感前列腺癌中骨折相关住院:使用医疗系统数据对STAMPEDE多西他赛和唑来膦酸3期试验的二次分析

IF 56.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
C Jones, P Dutey-Magni, L R Murphy, M L Murray, J E Brown, E McCloskey, M Brown, C L Amos, D C Gilbert, R J Jones, W Cross, D Matheson, R Millman, M K B Parmar, G Attard, M R Sydes, L C Brown, N D James, N W Clarke, A Sachdeva
{"title":"新诊断的高风险局部或转移性激素敏感前列腺癌中骨折相关住院:使用医疗系统数据对STAMPEDE多西他赛和唑来膦酸3期试验的二次分析","authors":"C Jones, P Dutey-Magni, L R Murphy, M L Murray, J E Brown, E McCloskey, M Brown, C L Amos, D C Gilbert, R J Jones, W Cross, D Matheson, R Millman, M K B Parmar, G Attard, M R Sydes, L C Brown, N D James, N W Clarke, A Sachdeva","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay systemic treatment for high risk non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk. The STAMPEDE trial tested the addition of zoledronic acid ± docetaxel (with prednisolone) to ADT. Both regimens may impact bone health. However, long-term fracture incidence remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Health systems data were obtained for pts recruited from England and randomised to standard-of-care (SOC) ADT compared with SOC plus zoledronic acid or docetaxel or both docetaxel and zoledronic acid. ICD10 diagnosis and OPCS procedure codes from inpatient hospital admissions were used to identify fracture-related hospitalisations (FRH). Flexible parametric competing risks models were used to estimate 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence and sub-distribution hazard ratios (SDHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,140 of 2,705 (79%) pts recruited from trial sites in England were eligible for this secondary analysis. Linked data were available for 2,042/2,140 (96%) pts (734 M0, 1,308 M1). 5-year cumulative incidence of fracture for M0 and M1 pts treated with SOC only was 11% (95% CI, 8-15%) and 23% (95% CI, 19-28%) respectively. 10-year cumulative incidence in M0 pts was 26% (95% CI, 20-33%). Allocation to zoledronic acid significantly reduced the risk of fracture in M1 pts (SDHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; p=0.015) but not M0 pts (SDHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.32; p=0.549). Docetaxel had no clear effect on the risk of fracture in M0 (p=0.570) or M1 (p=0.264) pts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High cumulative incidence of fracture was observed in both non-metastatic and metastatic PCa patients receiving ADT. The addition of zoledronic acid to ADT ± docetaxel significantly reduced long-term fracture risk in metastatic participants but had no clear effect in non-metastatic disease. These data support the use of bone protective agents to reduce fracture risk in men with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing ADT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture-related hospitalisations in newly diagnosed high-risk localised or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: secondary analysis of the STAMPEDE phase 3 trials of docetaxel and zoledronic acid using healthcare systems data.\",\"authors\":\"C Jones, P Dutey-Magni, L R Murphy, M L Murray, J E Brown, E McCloskey, M Brown, C L Amos, D C Gilbert, R J Jones, W Cross, D Matheson, R Millman, M K B Parmar, G Attard, M R Sydes, L C Brown, N D James, N W Clarke, A Sachdeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay systemic treatment for high risk non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk. The STAMPEDE trial tested the addition of zoledronic acid ± docetaxel (with prednisolone) to ADT. Both regimens may impact bone health. However, long-term fracture incidence remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Health systems data were obtained for pts recruited from England and randomised to standard-of-care (SOC) ADT compared with SOC plus zoledronic acid or docetaxel or both docetaxel and zoledronic acid. ICD10 diagnosis and OPCS procedure codes from inpatient hospital admissions were used to identify fracture-related hospitalisations (FRH). Flexible parametric competing risks models were used to estimate 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence and sub-distribution hazard ratios (SDHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,140 of 2,705 (79%) pts recruited from trial sites in England were eligible for this secondary analysis. Linked data were available for 2,042/2,140 (96%) pts (734 M0, 1,308 M1). 5-year cumulative incidence of fracture for M0 and M1 pts treated with SOC only was 11% (95% CI, 8-15%) and 23% (95% CI, 19-28%) respectively. 10-year cumulative incidence in M0 pts was 26% (95% CI, 20-33%). Allocation to zoledronic acid significantly reduced the risk of fracture in M1 pts (SDHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; p=0.015) but not M0 pts (SDHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.32; p=0.549). Docetaxel had no clear effect on the risk of fracture in M0 (p=0.570) or M1 (p=0.264) pts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High cumulative incidence of fracture was observed in both non-metastatic and metastatic PCa patients receiving ADT. The addition of zoledronic acid to ADT ± docetaxel significantly reduced long-term fracture risk in metastatic participants but had no clear effect in non-metastatic disease. These data support the use of bone protective agents to reduce fracture risk in men with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing ADT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":56.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)是高危非转移性(M0)和转移性(M1)前列腺癌(PCa)的主要全身治疗方法,与骨质流失和骨折风险增加有关。STAMPEDE试验测试了在ADT中加入唑来膦酸±多西他赛(加强的松龙)。这两种方法都可能影响骨骼健康。然而,长期骨折发生率仍不确定。患者和方法:从英格兰招募的患者获得卫生系统数据,并随机分配到标准护理(SOC) ADT,与SOC加唑来膦酸或多西他赛或多西他赛和唑来膦酸进行比较。使用住院患者的ICD10诊断和OPCS程序代码来识别骨折相关住院(FRH)。采用灵活参数竞争风险模型估计5年和10年累积发病率和亚分布风险比(SDHR)。结果:从英国试验点招募的2705名患者中,有2140名(79%)符合二级分析。相关数据为2,042/2,140(96%)例患者(734例M0, 1,308例M1)。仅接受SOC治疗的M0和M1患者的5年累计骨折发生率分别为11% (95% CI, 8-15%)和23% (95% CI, 19-28%)。M0患者10年累积发病率为26% (95% CI, 20-33%)。唑来膦酸可显著降低M1患者骨折的风险(SDHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97;p=0.015),但无M0 pts (SDHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.32;p = 0.549)。多西他赛对M0 (p=0.570)或M1 (p=0.264)点骨折风险无明显影响。结论:在接受ADT治疗的非转移性和转移性前列腺癌患者中,骨折的累积发生率都很高。在ADT±多西他赛中加入唑来膦酸可显著降低转移性患者的长期骨折风险,但对非转移性疾病无明显影响。这些数据支持使用骨保护剂来降低转移性前列腺癌患者接受ADT的骨折风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture-related hospitalisations in newly diagnosed high-risk localised or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: secondary analysis of the STAMPEDE phase 3 trials of docetaxel and zoledronic acid using healthcare systems data.

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay systemic treatment for high risk non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk. The STAMPEDE trial tested the addition of zoledronic acid ± docetaxel (with prednisolone) to ADT. Both regimens may impact bone health. However, long-term fracture incidence remains uncertain.

Patients and methods: Health systems data were obtained for pts recruited from England and randomised to standard-of-care (SOC) ADT compared with SOC plus zoledronic acid or docetaxel or both docetaxel and zoledronic acid. ICD10 diagnosis and OPCS procedure codes from inpatient hospital admissions were used to identify fracture-related hospitalisations (FRH). Flexible parametric competing risks models were used to estimate 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence and sub-distribution hazard ratios (SDHR).

Results: 2,140 of 2,705 (79%) pts recruited from trial sites in England were eligible for this secondary analysis. Linked data were available for 2,042/2,140 (96%) pts (734 M0, 1,308 M1). 5-year cumulative incidence of fracture for M0 and M1 pts treated with SOC only was 11% (95% CI, 8-15%) and 23% (95% CI, 19-28%) respectively. 10-year cumulative incidence in M0 pts was 26% (95% CI, 20-33%). Allocation to zoledronic acid significantly reduced the risk of fracture in M1 pts (SDHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; p=0.015) but not M0 pts (SDHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.32; p=0.549). Docetaxel had no clear effect on the risk of fracture in M0 (p=0.570) or M1 (p=0.264) pts.

Conclusions: High cumulative incidence of fracture was observed in both non-metastatic and metastatic PCa patients receiving ADT. The addition of zoledronic acid to ADT ± docetaxel significantly reduced long-term fracture risk in metastatic participants but had no clear effect in non-metastatic disease. These data support the use of bone protective agents to reduce fracture risk in men with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing ADT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信