Enrico Greco , Andrea Farci , Fiorella Florian , Alberto Pallavicini , Alessandro Miani , Pierluigi Barbieri , Giorgio Samorini
{"title":"麦角生物碱的分析鉴定:解决历史、法医和法律上的歧义","authors":"Enrico Greco , Andrea Farci , Fiorella Florian , Alberto Pallavicini , Alessandro Miani , Pierluigi Barbieri , Giorgio Samorini","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2025.100686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the longstanding taxonomic confusion between two plant species within the Convolvulaceae family: <em>Ipomoea tricolor</em> Cav. and <em>Ipomoea violacea</em> L., historically mistaken as synonymous. Employing advanced analytical methods including LC-MS/MS (Orbitrap), coupled with genetic barcoding, we provide clear biochemical differentiation between the two species based on the presence or absence of psychoactive ergoline alkaloids. Our analyses confirm that seeds of <em>I. tricolor</em> consistently contain significant levels of psychoactive compounds structurally similar to LSD, while <em>I. violacea</em> seeds lack these alkaloids entirely. This distinction is critical, as current legislative documents frequently misclassify non-psychoactive <em>I. violacea</em> as a controlled substance, inadvertently omitting the psychoactive <em>I. tricolor</em>. The analytical method is robust and precise, providing an effective forensic tool for the accurate identification of these botanically similar but chemically distinct species. Correct taxonomic and biochemical identification of these plants is essential to law enforcement and policy-makers for accurate legal scheduling and preventing regulatory misinterpretation regarding plant-derived psychoactive substances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical identification of ergot alkaloids in Ipomoea species: Resolving historical, forensic, and legal ambiguities\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Greco , Andrea Farci , Fiorella Florian , Alberto Pallavicini , Alessandro Miani , Pierluigi Barbieri , Giorgio Samorini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2025.100686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study addresses the longstanding taxonomic confusion between two plant species within the Convolvulaceae family: <em>Ipomoea tricolor</em> Cav. and <em>Ipomoea violacea</em> L., historically mistaken as synonymous. Employing advanced analytical methods including LC-MS/MS (Orbitrap), coupled with genetic barcoding, we provide clear biochemical differentiation between the two species based on the presence or absence of psychoactive ergoline alkaloids. Our analyses confirm that seeds of <em>I. tricolor</em> consistently contain significant levels of psychoactive compounds structurally similar to LSD, while <em>I. violacea</em> seeds lack these alkaloids entirely. This distinction is critical, as current legislative documents frequently misclassify non-psychoactive <em>I. violacea</em> as a controlled substance, inadvertently omitting the psychoactive <em>I. tricolor</em>. The analytical method is robust and precise, providing an effective forensic tool for the accurate identification of these botanically similar but chemically distinct species. Correct taxonomic and biochemical identification of these plants is essential to law enforcement and policy-makers for accurate legal scheduling and preventing regulatory misinterpretation regarding plant-derived psychoactive substances.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170925000487\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170925000487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytical identification of ergot alkaloids in Ipomoea species: Resolving historical, forensic, and legal ambiguities
This study addresses the longstanding taxonomic confusion between two plant species within the Convolvulaceae family: Ipomoea tricolor Cav. and Ipomoea violacea L., historically mistaken as synonymous. Employing advanced analytical methods including LC-MS/MS (Orbitrap), coupled with genetic barcoding, we provide clear biochemical differentiation between the two species based on the presence or absence of psychoactive ergoline alkaloids. Our analyses confirm that seeds of I. tricolor consistently contain significant levels of psychoactive compounds structurally similar to LSD, while I. violacea seeds lack these alkaloids entirely. This distinction is critical, as current legislative documents frequently misclassify non-psychoactive I. violacea as a controlled substance, inadvertently omitting the psychoactive I. tricolor. The analytical method is robust and precise, providing an effective forensic tool for the accurate identification of these botanically similar but chemically distinct species. Correct taxonomic and biochemical identification of these plants is essential to law enforcement and policy-makers for accurate legal scheduling and preventing regulatory misinterpretation regarding plant-derived psychoactive substances.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.