使用虚拟病房的障碍和促进因素:对定性证据的系统回顾。

Sara Cucurachi, Sinéad Lydon, Laura Louise Moens, Tanja Manser, Paul O'Connor
{"title":"使用虚拟病房的障碍和促进因素:对定性证据的系统回顾。","authors":"Sara Cucurachi, Sinéad Lydon, Laura Louise Moens, Tanja Manser, Paul O'Connor","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder using behavioural change models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis (DCA), as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation- Behaviour) and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorise and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches initially identified 7,489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were the lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources such as staffing, equipment, and funding, along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realise this potential, we must understand the barriers and facilitators to the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt, of care on virtual wards.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Cucurachi, Sinéad Lydon, Laura Louise Moens, Tanja Manser, Paul O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder using behavioural change models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis (DCA), as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation- Behaviour) and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorise and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches initially identified 7,489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were the lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources such as staffing, equipment, and funding, along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realise this potential, we must understand the barriers and facilitators to the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt, of care on virtual wards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟病房为传统的住院治疗提供了一种替代方案,在家中提供急症护理、监测和治疗,以防止住院或促进早期出院。我们定性系统评价的目的是从使用行为改变模型的任何相关利益相关者的角度出发,了解虚拟病房成功实施和可持续性的障碍和促进因素。方法:本综述方案在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024519627)。检索了以下数据库:Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO和Academic Search Complete。根据将COM-B(能力、机会和动机-行为)和TDF(理论领域框架)应用于定性数据的建议,进行了三阶段演绎内容分析(DCA),以将TDF领域作为指导框架,对纳入研究中确定的虚拟领域进行分类和映射障碍和促进因素。结果:搜索最初确定了7,489篇文章。16项研究符合纳入标准。患者和家属面临的常见障碍是缺乏语言技能、技术技能和医学知识。护理人员还被要求承担重大的医疗责任,而患者必须保持自我激励。引入适当的培训被视为一个有价值的促进因素。医疗保健提供者面临着许多可能影响医疗服务提供的技术障碍。强有力的领导是虚拟病房有效护理协调的重要推动者。从医疗保健系统的角度来看,人员、设备和资金等资源的可用性以及标准化协议对于成功实施虚拟病房至关重要。结论:虚拟病房可以缓解医院容量问题,并支持在患者自己家中提供安全有效的护理。然而,为了实现这一潜力,我们必须了解为患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员使用和成功实施虚拟病房的障碍和促进因素。这种理解将有助于制定有针对性的战略和干预措施,以支持在虚拟病房提供和接受护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.

Background: Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder using behavioural change models.

Methods: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis (DCA), as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation- Behaviour) and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorise and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.

Results: Searches initially identified 7,489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were the lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources such as staffing, equipment, and funding, along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.

Conclusions: Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realise this potential, we must understand the barriers and facilitators to the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt, of care on virtual wards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信