无家可归者的乳腺癌教育和筛查障碍。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Vicki L Brzoza, Elyse Ryan
{"title":"无家可归者的乳腺癌教育和筛查障碍。","authors":"Vicki L Brzoza, Elyse Ryan","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each year in the United States, approximately 42,211 women and men die from breast cancer. Individuals experiencing homelessness are disproportionately affected, facing a higher incidence of the disease. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a higher incidence of breast cancer and mortality than domiciled individuals. Across all 50 states, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides free breast cancer screenings for eligible individuals with limited financial resources. However, people experiencing homelessness have screening rates that remain below the national average. Early detection is critical to identifying breast cancer. When detected in the earliest local stages, there is a 90% or better survival rate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to examine the perspective of PEH regarding perceived challenges of obtaining breast cancer screenings, education, and care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design. Data were gathered using a focus group consisting of PEH in the state of New Jersey. This approach allowed the researchers to access multiple viewpoints of the phenomenon through robust discussions while prioritizing individual contributions and shared experiences. This qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design used trustworthiness to establish rigor, using essential details in credibility, dependability, transferability, and confirmability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen individuals participated. Major considerations for this PEH focus group were finances, family, time, accessibility, emotions, and education.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results may be used to assist health care practitioners in becoming more informed about barriers to breast cancer education, screenings, and care. Identifying needs about finances, obligations, accessibility, and education may assist healthcare practitioners in discussing these key factors with patients, which may lead patients to become more open to breast cancer screenings. More dialogue about breast cancer screenings with PEH may lead to more screening participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Cancer Barriers to Education and Screening in People Experiencing Homelessness.\",\"authors\":\"Vicki L Brzoza, Elyse Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each year in the United States, approximately 42,211 women and men die from breast cancer. Individuals experiencing homelessness are disproportionately affected, facing a higher incidence of the disease. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a higher incidence of breast cancer and mortality than domiciled individuals. Across all 50 states, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides free breast cancer screenings for eligible individuals with limited financial resources. However, people experiencing homelessness have screening rates that remain below the national average. Early detection is critical to identifying breast cancer. When detected in the earliest local stages, there is a 90% or better survival rate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to examine the perspective of PEH regarding perceived challenges of obtaining breast cancer screenings, education, and care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design. Data were gathered using a focus group consisting of PEH in the state of New Jersey. This approach allowed the researchers to access multiple viewpoints of the phenomenon through robust discussions while prioritizing individual contributions and shared experiences. This qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design used trustworthiness to establish rigor, using essential details in credibility, dependability, transferability, and confirmability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen individuals participated. Major considerations for this PEH focus group were finances, family, time, accessibility, emotions, and education.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results may be used to assist health care practitioners in becoming more informed about barriers to breast cancer education, screenings, and care. Identifying needs about finances, obligations, accessibility, and education may assist healthcare practitioners in discussing these key factors with patients, which may lead patients to become more open to breast cancer screenings. More dialogue about breast cancer screenings with PEH may lead to more screening participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000853\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,每年大约有42211名女性和男性死于乳腺癌。无家可归者受到的影响尤为严重,他们面临着更高的疾病发病率。无家可归者的乳腺癌发病率和死亡率高于定居者。在所有50个州,疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)为经济资源有限的符合条件的个人提供免费的乳腺癌筛查。然而,无家可归者的筛查率仍低于全国平均水平。早期发现是确定乳腺癌的关键。如果在早期的局部阶段检测到,存活率为90%或更高。目的:本研究的目的是研究PEH在获得乳腺癌筛查、教育和护理方面的认知挑战。方法:采用定性解释学现象学设计。数据是通过由新泽西州的PEH组成的焦点小组收集的。这种方法允许研究人员在优先考虑个人贡献和分享经验的同时,通过激烈的讨论获得对这一现象的多种观点。这种定性解释学现象学设计使用可信性来建立严谨性,使用可信性、可靠性、可转移性和可确认性等基本细节。结果:18人参与。PEH焦点小组的主要考虑因素是经济、家庭、时间、可及性、情感和教育。讨论:研究结果可用于帮助卫生保健从业人员更加了解乳腺癌教育、筛查和护理的障碍。确定有关财务、义务、可及性和教育方面的需求可能有助于保健从业者与患者讨论这些关键因素,这可能导致患者对乳腺癌筛查更加开放。更多关于PEH乳腺癌筛查的对话可能会导致更多的筛查参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast Cancer Barriers to Education and Screening in People Experiencing Homelessness.

Background: Each year in the United States, approximately 42,211 women and men die from breast cancer. Individuals experiencing homelessness are disproportionately affected, facing a higher incidence of the disease. People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a higher incidence of breast cancer and mortality than domiciled individuals. Across all 50 states, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides free breast cancer screenings for eligible individuals with limited financial resources. However, people experiencing homelessness have screening rates that remain below the national average. Early detection is critical to identifying breast cancer. When detected in the earliest local stages, there is a 90% or better survival rate.

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the perspective of PEH regarding perceived challenges of obtaining breast cancer screenings, education, and care.

Methods: We used a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design. Data were gathered using a focus group consisting of PEH in the state of New Jersey. This approach allowed the researchers to access multiple viewpoints of the phenomenon through robust discussions while prioritizing individual contributions and shared experiences. This qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology design used trustworthiness to establish rigor, using essential details in credibility, dependability, transferability, and confirmability.

Results: Eighteen individuals participated. Major considerations for this PEH focus group were finances, family, time, accessibility, emotions, and education.

Discussion: The results may be used to assist health care practitioners in becoming more informed about barriers to breast cancer education, screenings, and care. Identifying needs about finances, obligations, accessibility, and education may assist healthcare practitioners in discussing these key factors with patients, which may lead patients to become more open to breast cancer screenings. More dialogue about breast cancer screenings with PEH may lead to more screening participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信