人们在什么条件下接受健康不平等?经合组织国家的跨国回归分析

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Minjung Kim, Young Jun Choi
{"title":"人们在什么条件下接受健康不平等?经合组织国家的跨国回归分析","authors":"Minjung Kim,&nbsp;Young Jun Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health inequality remains a persistent challenge for welfare states. Over the past two decades (1999–2019), neoliberal policies and rising inequality have significantly influenced these attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study investigates the evolution of public attitudes towards health inequality in OECD countries and evaluates the interaction between institutional structures and societal norms over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employs a longitudinal quantitative design utilizing data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) Social Inequality module (1999, 2009, 2019) across 12 OECD countries. Descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression models were conducted to test grievance and policy feedback theories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 1999, countries with lower public healthcare spending and higher inequality exhibited strong opposition to health inequality. However, by 2019, attitudes shifted, with opposition decreasing in highly unequal societies and increasing in countries with robust public healthcare spending. Regression analyses revealed significant changes over time, suggesting a transition from grievance-based responses to inequality toward acceptance influenced by policy feedback effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings underscore the need for policymakers to consider long-term policy impacts on public perceptions. Institutional frameworks fostering equitable healthcare access can counter the normalization of inequality, thereby promoting societal resistance to health disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under what conditions do people accept health inequality? A cross-national regression analysis of OECD countries\",\"authors\":\"Minjung Kim,&nbsp;Young Jun Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health inequality remains a persistent challenge for welfare states. Over the past two decades (1999–2019), neoliberal policies and rising inequality have significantly influenced these attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study investigates the evolution of public attitudes towards health inequality in OECD countries and evaluates the interaction between institutional structures and societal norms over time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employs a longitudinal quantitative design utilizing data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) Social Inequality module (1999, 2009, 2019) across 12 OECD countries. Descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression models were conducted to test grievance and policy feedback theories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 1999, countries with lower public healthcare spending and higher inequality exhibited strong opposition to health inequality. However, by 2019, attitudes shifted, with opposition decreasing in highly unequal societies and increasing in countries with robust public healthcare spending. Regression analyses revealed significant changes over time, suggesting a transition from grievance-based responses to inequality toward acceptance influenced by policy feedback effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings underscore the need for policymakers to consider long-term policy impacts on public perceptions. Institutional frameworks fostering equitable healthcare access can counter the normalization of inequality, thereby promoting societal resistance to health disparities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康不平等仍然是福利国家面临的一个持续挑战。在过去的二十年(1999-2019)中,新自由主义政策和日益加剧的不平等对这些态度产生了重大影响。目的本研究调查了经合组织国家公众对卫生不平等态度的演变,并评估了制度结构和社会规范之间的相互作用。方法本研究采用纵向定量设计,利用国际社会调查计划(ISSP)社会不平等模块(1999年、2009年、2019年)在12个经合组织国家的数据。采用描述性分析和多元线性回归模型对申诉和政策反馈理论进行检验。结果1999年,公共卫生支出较低、不平等程度较高的国家对卫生不平等表现出强烈的反对态度。然而,到2019年,人们的态度发生了转变,在高度不平等的社会中,反对意见有所减少,而在公共医疗支出强劲的国家,反对意见有所增加。回归分析揭示了随着时间的推移而发生的重大变化,表明从基于不满的不平等反应向受政策反馈效应影响的接受转变。研究结果强调,政策制定者需要考虑政策对公众看法的长期影响。促进公平获得医疗保健的体制框架可以对抗不平等的正常化,从而促进社会对健康差异的抵制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Under what conditions do people accept health inequality? A cross-national regression analysis of OECD countries

Background

Health inequality remains a persistent challenge for welfare states. Over the past two decades (1999–2019), neoliberal policies and rising inequality have significantly influenced these attitudes.

Objective

The study investigates the evolution of public attitudes towards health inequality in OECD countries and evaluates the interaction between institutional structures and societal norms over time.

Methods

This study employs a longitudinal quantitative design utilizing data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) Social Inequality module (1999, 2009, 2019) across 12 OECD countries. Descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression models were conducted to test grievance and policy feedback theories.

Results

In 1999, countries with lower public healthcare spending and higher inequality exhibited strong opposition to health inequality. However, by 2019, attitudes shifted, with opposition decreasing in highly unequal societies and increasing in countries with robust public healthcare spending. Regression analyses revealed significant changes over time, suggesting a transition from grievance-based responses to inequality toward acceptance influenced by policy feedback effects.

Conclusions

The findings underscore the need for policymakers to consider long-term policy impacts on public perceptions. Institutional frameworks fostering equitable healthcare access can counter the normalization of inequality, thereby promoting societal resistance to health disparities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信