{"title":"心理声学学习方法与高保真模拟对护生心脏听诊能力的影响:随机对照研究","authors":"Gülcan Eyüboğlu , Evrim Sarıtaş , Nurcan Çalışkan , Zehra Göçmen Baykara","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the psychoacoustic learning method and high-fidelity simulation on the cardiac auscultation competence of nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac auscultation is a crucial skill for nursing students, yet many struggle to develop proficiency. Simulation-based training has emerged as a potential solution, but the effectiveness of different simulation modalities remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomized controlled experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 52 s-year nursing students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: psychoacoustic learning (n = 18), high-fidelity simulation (n = 17) and control (n = 17). Cardiac auscultation competence was assessed through a success test administered at three-time points: pre-test, post-test and follow-up (four weeks later). Learning satisfaction and self-confidence in learning were measured post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The psychoacoustic learning group significantly improved cardiac auscultation scores from pre-test to post-test and follow-up (p < 0.05). The high-fidelity simulation group improved from pre- to post-test (p < 0.05) but not at follow-up. The control group showed no significant changes. No significant between-group differences in auscultation scores (p > 0.05), but high-fidelity simulation had higher learning satisfaction (p = 0.013) and total scale scores (p = 0.017) than psychoacoustic learning. Group-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.547).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Psychoacoustic learning boosts short- and medium-term cardiac auscultation skills, while high-fidelity simulation enhances short-term performance and learning satisfaction. Combining psychoacoustic methods with simulation or traditional teaching may improve sustainable learning outcomes, balancing effectiveness, accessibility and cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of psychoacoustic learning method and high-fidelity simulation on the cardiac auscultation competence of nursing students: A randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Gülcan Eyüboğlu , Evrim Sarıtaş , Nurcan Çalışkan , Zehra Göçmen Baykara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the psychoacoustic learning method and high-fidelity simulation on the cardiac auscultation competence of nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac auscultation is a crucial skill for nursing students, yet many struggle to develop proficiency. Simulation-based training has emerged as a potential solution, but the effectiveness of different simulation modalities remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomized controlled experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 52 s-year nursing students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: psychoacoustic learning (n = 18), high-fidelity simulation (n = 17) and control (n = 17). Cardiac auscultation competence was assessed through a success test administered at three-time points: pre-test, post-test and follow-up (four weeks later). Learning satisfaction and self-confidence in learning were measured post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The psychoacoustic learning group significantly improved cardiac auscultation scores from pre-test to post-test and follow-up (p < 0.05). The high-fidelity simulation group improved from pre- to post-test (p < 0.05) but not at follow-up. The control group showed no significant changes. No significant between-group differences in auscultation scores (p > 0.05), but high-fidelity simulation had higher learning satisfaction (p = 0.013) and total scale scores (p = 0.017) than psychoacoustic learning. Group-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.547).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Psychoacoustic learning boosts short- and medium-term cardiac auscultation skills, while high-fidelity simulation enhances short-term performance and learning satisfaction. Combining psychoacoustic methods with simulation or traditional teaching may improve sustainable learning outcomes, balancing effectiveness, accessibility and cost.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325002318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325002318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of psychoacoustic learning method and high-fidelity simulation on the cardiac auscultation competence of nursing students: A randomized controlled study
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the psychoacoustic learning method and high-fidelity simulation on the cardiac auscultation competence of nursing students.
Background
Cardiac auscultation is a crucial skill for nursing students, yet many struggle to develop proficiency. Simulation-based training has emerged as a potential solution, but the effectiveness of different simulation modalities remains unclear.
Design
A randomized controlled experimental study.
Method
A total of 52 s-year nursing students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: psychoacoustic learning (n = 18), high-fidelity simulation (n = 17) and control (n = 17). Cardiac auscultation competence was assessed through a success test administered at three-time points: pre-test, post-test and follow-up (four weeks later). Learning satisfaction and self-confidence in learning were measured post-intervention.
Results
The psychoacoustic learning group significantly improved cardiac auscultation scores from pre-test to post-test and follow-up (p < 0.05). The high-fidelity simulation group improved from pre- to post-test (p < 0.05) but not at follow-up. The control group showed no significant changes. No significant between-group differences in auscultation scores (p > 0.05), but high-fidelity simulation had higher learning satisfaction (p = 0.013) and total scale scores (p = 0.017) than psychoacoustic learning. Group-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.547).
Conclusions
Psychoacoustic learning boosts short- and medium-term cardiac auscultation skills, while high-fidelity simulation enhances short-term performance and learning satisfaction. Combining psychoacoustic methods with simulation or traditional teaching may improve sustainable learning outcomes, balancing effectiveness, accessibility and cost.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.