间质性高剂量率近距离放疗与立体定向屏气放疗治疗不能手术的原发性和继发性肝肿瘤的比较

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Philipp Geissler , Saskia Spautz , Kathrin Hering , Isabell Seiler , Frank Heinicke , Ilias Sachpazidis , Dimos Baltas , Sebastian Schäfer , Christos Moustakis , Nils H. Nicolay , Franziska Nägler
{"title":"间质性高剂量率近距离放疗与立体定向屏气放疗治疗不能手术的原发性和继发性肝肿瘤的比较","authors":"Philipp Geissler ,&nbsp;Saskia Spautz ,&nbsp;Kathrin Hering ,&nbsp;Isabell Seiler ,&nbsp;Frank Heinicke ,&nbsp;Ilias Sachpazidis ,&nbsp;Dimos Baltas ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schäfer ,&nbsp;Christos Moustakis ,&nbsp;Nils H. Nicolay ,&nbsp;Franziska Nägler","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>In recent years, ablative radiotherapy of primary and secondary liver tumors has become a highly regarded treatment option. We aimed to compare high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-iBT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in order to support future decisions on the appropriate radiation technique for liver tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Forty-two patients with 1–4 liver malignancies undergoing HDR-iBT with 1x15-20 Gy were included. Eighty-eight SBRT plans in DIBH or FB with a prescription dose of 3x12.5 Gy to the surrounding 67 % isodose were generated using the HDR-iBT-computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters according to ICRU91 regarding organs-at-risk (OAR), target coverage, generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub>), biological dose parameters, dose uniformity, conformity and plan quality indices were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean target doses for HDR-iBT were at least twice as high as in SBRT, but target coverage was significantly more conformal for SBRT and the gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub> was higher (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The healthy tissue conformity indices (HTCI) for SBRT<sub>FB</sub> and SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> were significantly higher than for HDR-iBT (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). For all techniques, a significant positive correlation between HTCI and target volume size was found. HDR-iBT achieved lower mean and maximum doses for most investigated OAR-parameters. Comparing SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> and SBRT<sub>FB</sub>, all OAR-parameters presented significantly lower values for SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> achieved a more conformal target coverage with both higher minimal doses and gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub>, brachytherapy offered higher mean and maximal doses to the target volume and a better sparing of OAR, depending on optimal catheter positioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold technique for inoperable primary and secondary liver tumors\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Geissler ,&nbsp;Saskia Spautz ,&nbsp;Kathrin Hering ,&nbsp;Isabell Seiler ,&nbsp;Frank Heinicke ,&nbsp;Ilias Sachpazidis ,&nbsp;Dimos Baltas ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schäfer ,&nbsp;Christos Moustakis ,&nbsp;Nils H. Nicolay ,&nbsp;Franziska Nägler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>In recent years, ablative radiotherapy of primary and secondary liver tumors has become a highly regarded treatment option. We aimed to compare high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-iBT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in order to support future decisions on the appropriate radiation technique for liver tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Forty-two patients with 1–4 liver malignancies undergoing HDR-iBT with 1x15-20 Gy were included. Eighty-eight SBRT plans in DIBH or FB with a prescription dose of 3x12.5 Gy to the surrounding 67 % isodose were generated using the HDR-iBT-computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters according to ICRU91 regarding organs-at-risk (OAR), target coverage, generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub>), biological dose parameters, dose uniformity, conformity and plan quality indices were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean target doses for HDR-iBT were at least twice as high as in SBRT, but target coverage was significantly more conformal for SBRT and the gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub> was higher (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The healthy tissue conformity indices (HTCI) for SBRT<sub>FB</sub> and SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> were significantly higher than for HDR-iBT (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). For all techniques, a significant positive correlation between HTCI and target volume size was found. HDR-iBT achieved lower mean and maximum doses for most investigated OAR-parameters. Comparing SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> and SBRT<sub>FB</sub>, all OAR-parameters presented significantly lower values for SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While SBRT<sub>DIBH</sub> achieved a more conformal target coverage with both higher minimal doses and gEUD<sub>2Gy</sub>, brachytherapy offered higher mean and maximal doses to the target volume and a better sparing of OAR, depending on optimal catheter positioning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的近年来,原发性和继发性肝脏肿瘤的消融放疗已成为一种备受重视的治疗选择。我们的目的是比较高剂量率间质近距离放疗(HDR-iBT)和立体定向体放疗(SBRT)在自由呼吸(FB)和深吸气屏气(DIBH)中的应用,以支持未来对肝肿瘤合适的放疗技术的决策。材料和方法纳入42例1-4例肝脏恶性肿瘤患者,接受1x15- 20gy的HDR-iBT治疗。使用hdr - ibt计算机断层扫描生成88个DIBH或FB的SBRT计划,处方剂量为3x12.5 Gy至周围67%等剂量。比较ICRU91中有关危险器官(OAR)、靶覆盖率、广义等效均匀剂量(gEUD2Gy)、生物剂量参数、剂量均匀性、一致性和计划质量指标的剂量-体积参数。结果HDR-iBT的平均靶剂量至少是SBRT的两倍,但SBRT的靶覆盖率明显更符合条件,gEUD2Gy更高(p <;0.001)。SBRTFB和SBRTDIBH的健康组织一致性指数(HTCI)显著高于HDR-iBT (p <;0.001)。对于所有技术,HTCI与靶体积大小之间存在显著的正相关。HDR-iBT在大多数研究的桨形参数中获得较低的平均和最大剂量。与SBRTDIBH和SBRTFB相比,SBRTDIBH的所有桨叶参数值均显著降低(p <;0.001)。结论虽然SBRTDIBH在更高的最小剂量和gEUD2Gy下实现了更适格的靶覆盖,但近距离治疗可提供更高的靶体积平均和最大剂量,并更好地保留OAR,这取决于最佳导管定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold technique for inoperable primary and secondary liver tumors

Background and purpose

In recent years, ablative radiotherapy of primary and secondary liver tumors has become a highly regarded treatment option. We aimed to compare high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-iBT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in order to support future decisions on the appropriate radiation technique for liver tumors.

Materials and methods

Forty-two patients with 1–4 liver malignancies undergoing HDR-iBT with 1x15-20 Gy were included. Eighty-eight SBRT plans in DIBH or FB with a prescription dose of 3x12.5 Gy to the surrounding 67 % isodose were generated using the HDR-iBT-computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters according to ICRU91 regarding organs-at-risk (OAR), target coverage, generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD2Gy), biological dose parameters, dose uniformity, conformity and plan quality indices were compared.

Results

The mean target doses for HDR-iBT were at least twice as high as in SBRT, but target coverage was significantly more conformal for SBRT and the gEUD2Gy was higher (p < 0.001). The healthy tissue conformity indices (HTCI) for SBRTFB and SBRTDIBH were significantly higher than for HDR-iBT (p < 0.001). For all techniques, a significant positive correlation between HTCI and target volume size was found. HDR-iBT achieved lower mean and maximum doses for most investigated OAR-parameters. Comparing SBRTDIBH and SBRTFB, all OAR-parameters presented significantly lower values for SBRTDIBH (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While SBRTDIBH achieved a more conformal target coverage with both higher minimal doses and gEUD2Gy, brachytherapy offered higher mean and maximal doses to the target volume and a better sparing of OAR, depending on optimal catheter positioning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信