弧长对肺立体定向消融放疗监测单元深度学习预测的影响

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mathieu Gaudreault , Lachlan McIntosh , Katrina Woodford , Jason Li , Susan Harden , Sandro Porceddu , Vanessa Panettieri , Nicholas Hardcastle
{"title":"弧长对肺立体定向消融放疗监测单元深度学习预测的影响","authors":"Mathieu Gaudreault ,&nbsp;Lachlan McIntosh ,&nbsp;Katrina Woodford ,&nbsp;Jason Li ,&nbsp;Susan Harden ,&nbsp;Sandro Porceddu ,&nbsp;Vanessa Panettieri ,&nbsp;Nicholas Hardcastle","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The dose magnitude required to fine-tune radiation in multi-lesion stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) treatment to the lung is driven by the monitor units (MU) per control point (CP). We investigate the arc length effect on the deep learning (DL) prediction of the MU per CP for automated lung lesions treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive lung cancer patients treated at our institution between 01/2019 and 11/2024 were considered. Two models were trained, one on a homogeneous (same-nCP) and the other on a heterogeneous (diff-nCP) set of arc lengths with an equivalent number of samples. A third model was trained with an increased sample size of heterogeneous arc lengths (all-nCP). The predicted MU per CP were converted to meterset weights and MU per beam. The dosimetry achieved with predicted MU per CP was compared with the clinical dosimetry using gamma passing rates (γPR) and achieved clinical goals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 60,720 samples from 295 treatments of 257 patients were included. The mean absolute percentage error between predicted and clinical meterset weights/MU per beam was less than 5.5 %/5.3 % with the all-nCP model and less than 8.3 %/7.1 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP model. The median γPR(3 %, 2 mm) was 100 % with the all-nCP model and greater than 99.4 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP models. All models provided the same or greater number of achieved clinical goals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DL model trained with variable arc lengths allowed increased sample size and provided equivalent dosimetry in multi-lesion SABR treatment to the lung.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of arc length on the deep learning prediction of monitor units in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy treatment\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Gaudreault ,&nbsp;Lachlan McIntosh ,&nbsp;Katrina Woodford ,&nbsp;Jason Li ,&nbsp;Susan Harden ,&nbsp;Sandro Porceddu ,&nbsp;Vanessa Panettieri ,&nbsp;Nicholas Hardcastle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The dose magnitude required to fine-tune radiation in multi-lesion stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) treatment to the lung is driven by the monitor units (MU) per control point (CP). We investigate the arc length effect on the deep learning (DL) prediction of the MU per CP for automated lung lesions treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive lung cancer patients treated at our institution between 01/2019 and 11/2024 were considered. Two models were trained, one on a homogeneous (same-nCP) and the other on a heterogeneous (diff-nCP) set of arc lengths with an equivalent number of samples. A third model was trained with an increased sample size of heterogeneous arc lengths (all-nCP). The predicted MU per CP were converted to meterset weights and MU per beam. The dosimetry achieved with predicted MU per CP was compared with the clinical dosimetry using gamma passing rates (γPR) and achieved clinical goals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 60,720 samples from 295 treatments of 257 patients were included. The mean absolute percentage error between predicted and clinical meterset weights/MU per beam was less than 5.5 %/5.3 % with the all-nCP model and less than 8.3 %/7.1 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP model. The median γPR(3 %, 2 mm) was 100 % with the all-nCP model and greater than 99.4 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP models. All models provided the same or greater number of achieved clinical goals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DL model trained with variable arc lengths allowed increased sample size and provided equivalent dosimetry in multi-lesion SABR treatment to the lung.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001280\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肺多病变立体定向放射治疗(SABR)治疗中,微调辐射所需的剂量大小由每个控制点(CP)的监测单位(MU)驱动。我们研究了弧长对深度学习(DL)预测MU / CP的影响,用于自动肺病变治疗计划。方法选取2019年1月至2024年11月在我院连续治疗的肺癌患者。两个模型被训练,一个是在一个均匀的(相同的ncp)上,另一个是在一个具有相同数量的样本的非均匀的(差异的ncp)弧长集上。第三个模型的训练增加了非均匀弧长(all-nCP)的样本量。将预测的每CP的MU转换为米重和每梁的MU。用预测MU / CP获得的剂量学与用γ通过率(γPR)获得的临床剂量学进行比较,并达到临床目标。结果共纳入257例患者295个治疗方案60720份样本。全ncp模型预测和临床计量重量/MU / beam之间的平均绝对百分比误差小于5.5% / 5.3%,相同ncp和差异ncp模型的平均绝对百分比误差小于8.3% / 7.1%。全ncp模型的中位γPR(3%, 2 mm)为100%,相同ncp和差异ncp模型的中位γPR大于99.4%。所有模型均提供相同或更多数量的临床目标实现。结论可变弧长训练的sdl模型可以增加样本量,并为肺部多病变SABR治疗提供等效剂量学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of arc length on the deep learning prediction of monitor units in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy treatment

Introduction

The dose magnitude required to fine-tune radiation in multi-lesion stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) treatment to the lung is driven by the monitor units (MU) per control point (CP). We investigate the arc length effect on the deep learning (DL) prediction of the MU per CP for automated lung lesions treatment planning.

Methods

Consecutive lung cancer patients treated at our institution between 01/2019 and 11/2024 were considered. Two models were trained, one on a homogeneous (same-nCP) and the other on a heterogeneous (diff-nCP) set of arc lengths with an equivalent number of samples. A third model was trained with an increased sample size of heterogeneous arc lengths (all-nCP). The predicted MU per CP were converted to meterset weights and MU per beam. The dosimetry achieved with predicted MU per CP was compared with the clinical dosimetry using gamma passing rates (γPR) and achieved clinical goals.

Results

In total, 60,720 samples from 295 treatments of 257 patients were included. The mean absolute percentage error between predicted and clinical meterset weights/MU per beam was less than 5.5 %/5.3 % with the all-nCP model and less than 8.3 %/7.1 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP model. The median γPR(3 %, 2 mm) was 100 % with the all-nCP model and greater than 99.4 % with the same-nCP and diff-nCP models. All models provided the same or greater number of achieved clinical goals.

Conclusions

DL model trained with variable arc lengths allowed increased sample size and provided equivalent dosimetry in multi-lesion SABR treatment to the lung.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信