Evangelina Martínez-Francés , Verónica Morán , Ana M. Romero , J. Pablo Cabello-García , Alberto Viñals , Javier Burguete , Sergio Rivera , Rafael Rodríguez , Roberto Méndez , Carles Domingo , Josep M. Martí-Climent
{"title":"同步加速器质子治疗设施中用于辐射防护的个人和环境中子探测器的相互比较:实验和蒙特卡罗结果","authors":"Evangelina Martínez-Francés , Verónica Morán , Ana M. Romero , J. Pablo Cabello-García , Alberto Viñals , Javier Burguete , Sergio Rivera , Rafael Rodríguez , Roberto Méndez , Carles Domingo , Josep M. Martí-Climent","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates ambient and personal neutron detectors in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility, using experimental data and Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulations. It aims to assess the interchangeability of detectors, characterize neutron doses in the treatment room, and provide radiological protection recommendations. <em>Method</em>: A 10 × 10 × 10 cm<sup>3</sup> volume (energy range: 121–173 MeV) was irradiated on a 30 × 30 × 60 cm<sup>3</sup> solid water phantom. Ambient dose equivalent (<em>H*</em>(10)) was measured using two extended-energy-range detectors (LUPIN-II, WENDI-II) at 20 positions. Personal dose equivalent (<em>H<sub>p</sub></em>(10)) was evaluated using five dosimeters (bubble detectors, DOPEN tracks, NeutrakT, MCP6/MCP7 TLDs, NRF51 EPD) at 14–20 positions. Bland-Altman analysis quantified agreement. TOPAS, a Monte Carlo code, was employed to calculate neutron spectra and to compare the results with experimental <em>H*</em>(10) values for its validation. <em>Results</em>: The WENDI-II and LUPIN-II detectors showed good agreement, with WENDI-II readings 14 % higher on average. Among personal dosimeters, DOPEN tracks exhibited the closest agreement with bubble detectors, with a bias of −33 %. In constrast, NeutrakT underperformed due to its high detection limit. TOPAS simulations aligned with experimental <em>H*</em>(10) trends, with differences ranging from 0 to 32 %, except for positions involving significant PMMA attenuation. Neutron spectra revealed angular and distance-dependent variations, with thermal neutrons dominating at larger distances. <em>Conclusions</em>: Both WENDI-II and LUPIN-II are suitable for environmental neutron monitoring in synchrotron-based facilities. DOPEN tracks emerged as the most reliable passive personal dosimeter for <em>H<sub>p</sub></em>(10). Monte Carlo simulations enhanced understanding of neutron field behavior and were validated, in terms of <em>H*</em>(10), by the experimental results. Recommendations for radiological protection include replicating accidental exposures with WENDI-II and LUPIN-II to estimate doses accurately.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercomparison of personal and ambient neutron detectors used for radiation protection in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility: experimental and Monte Carlo results\",\"authors\":\"Evangelina Martínez-Francés , Verónica Morán , Ana M. Romero , J. Pablo Cabello-García , Alberto Viñals , Javier Burguete , Sergio Rivera , Rafael Rodríguez , Roberto Méndez , Carles Domingo , Josep M. Martí-Climent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates ambient and personal neutron detectors in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility, using experimental data and Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulations. It aims to assess the interchangeability of detectors, characterize neutron doses in the treatment room, and provide radiological protection recommendations. <em>Method</em>: A 10 × 10 × 10 cm<sup>3</sup> volume (energy range: 121–173 MeV) was irradiated on a 30 × 30 × 60 cm<sup>3</sup> solid water phantom. Ambient dose equivalent (<em>H*</em>(10)) was measured using two extended-energy-range detectors (LUPIN-II, WENDI-II) at 20 positions. Personal dose equivalent (<em>H<sub>p</sub></em>(10)) was evaluated using five dosimeters (bubble detectors, DOPEN tracks, NeutrakT, MCP6/MCP7 TLDs, NRF51 EPD) at 14–20 positions. Bland-Altman analysis quantified agreement. TOPAS, a Monte Carlo code, was employed to calculate neutron spectra and to compare the results with experimental <em>H*</em>(10) values for its validation. <em>Results</em>: The WENDI-II and LUPIN-II detectors showed good agreement, with WENDI-II readings 14 % higher on average. Among personal dosimeters, DOPEN tracks exhibited the closest agreement with bubble detectors, with a bias of −33 %. In constrast, NeutrakT underperformed due to its high detection limit. TOPAS simulations aligned with experimental <em>H*</em>(10) trends, with differences ranging from 0 to 32 %, except for positions involving significant PMMA attenuation. Neutron spectra revealed angular and distance-dependent variations, with thermal neutrons dominating at larger distances. <em>Conclusions</em>: Both WENDI-II and LUPIN-II are suitable for environmental neutron monitoring in synchrotron-based facilities. DOPEN tracks emerged as the most reliable passive personal dosimeter for <em>H<sub>p</sub></em>(10). Monte Carlo simulations enhanced understanding of neutron field behavior and were validated, in terms of <em>H*</em>(10), by the experimental results. Recommendations for radiological protection include replicating accidental exposures with WENDI-II and LUPIN-II to estimate doses accurately.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intercomparison of personal and ambient neutron detectors used for radiation protection in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility: experimental and Monte Carlo results
Purpose
This study evaluates ambient and personal neutron detectors in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility, using experimental data and Monte Carlo (TOPAS) simulations. It aims to assess the interchangeability of detectors, characterize neutron doses in the treatment room, and provide radiological protection recommendations. Method: A 10 × 10 × 10 cm3 volume (energy range: 121–173 MeV) was irradiated on a 30 × 30 × 60 cm3 solid water phantom. Ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)) was measured using two extended-energy-range detectors (LUPIN-II, WENDI-II) at 20 positions. Personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)) was evaluated using five dosimeters (bubble detectors, DOPEN tracks, NeutrakT, MCP6/MCP7 TLDs, NRF51 EPD) at 14–20 positions. Bland-Altman analysis quantified agreement. TOPAS, a Monte Carlo code, was employed to calculate neutron spectra and to compare the results with experimental H*(10) values for its validation. Results: The WENDI-II and LUPIN-II detectors showed good agreement, with WENDI-II readings 14 % higher on average. Among personal dosimeters, DOPEN tracks exhibited the closest agreement with bubble detectors, with a bias of −33 %. In constrast, NeutrakT underperformed due to its high detection limit. TOPAS simulations aligned with experimental H*(10) trends, with differences ranging from 0 to 32 %, except for positions involving significant PMMA attenuation. Neutron spectra revealed angular and distance-dependent variations, with thermal neutrons dominating at larger distances. Conclusions: Both WENDI-II and LUPIN-II are suitable for environmental neutron monitoring in synchrotron-based facilities. DOPEN tracks emerged as the most reliable passive personal dosimeter for Hp(10). Monte Carlo simulations enhanced understanding of neutron field behavior and were validated, in terms of H*(10), by the experimental results. Recommendations for radiological protection include replicating accidental exposures with WENDI-II and LUPIN-II to estimate doses accurately.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.