逆行经静脉闭塞术对胃静脉曲张出血初级预防的效果。

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Canadian liver journal Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3138/canlivj-2024-0012
Nisha Howarth, Yashasavi Sachar, Derek Hw Little, David Peck, Amol Mujoomdar, Derek W Cool, David Hocking, Anouar Teriaky, Karim Qumosani, Qasim Khan, Ephraim Tang, Anton Skaro, Juan Pablo Arab, Mayur Brahmania
{"title":"逆行经静脉闭塞术对胃静脉曲张出血初级预防的效果。","authors":"Nisha Howarth, Yashasavi Sachar, Derek Hw Little, David Peck, Amol Mujoomdar, Derek W Cool, David Hocking, Anouar Teriaky, Karim Qumosani, Qasim Khan, Ephraim Tang, Anton Skaro, Juan Pablo Arab, Mayur Brahmania","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde transvenous obliteration is an endovascular interventional radiology procedure demonstrating safety and efficacy for secondary prophylaxis in high-risk gastric varices. However, its efficacy as primary prophylaxis is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and case series to evaluate the utility of this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search utilized EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Inclusion criteria involved single technique obliteration, known varices, and exclusively primary prophylaxis. The primary outcome was gastric variceal bleeding, with secondary outcomes of technical success, variceal eradication, adverse events, and mortality. A retrospective case series of nine patients who underwent primary prophylaxis at our North American centre was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 842 articles retrieved, 69 were eligible for full-text review, with the 9 studies included in the final analysis involving balloon-occluded, but not plug-assisted or coil-assisted, techniques. Only 2/9 studies involved comparator groups, with a single prospective non-randomized trial, and there was a high risk of bias in 8/9 studies. The technical success rate of the balloon-occluded obliteration technique ranged from 82% to 100%, and the variceal eradication rate ranged from 88% to 100%. In comparative studies, patients had decreased variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality compared with control cohorts. Our case series demonstrated a 78% survival rate with no variceal bleeding. Post-procedure ascites and worsening esophageal varices ranged from 0-55% to 11-80%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review summarizes evidence regarding the efficacy of retrograde transvenous obliteration, with available studies demonstrating a high success rate in eradicating varices and preventing bleeding-associated mortality, albeit with concerns of overall quality of existing literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":510884,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Primary Prophylaxis of Gastric Variceal Bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Nisha Howarth, Yashasavi Sachar, Derek Hw Little, David Peck, Amol Mujoomdar, Derek W Cool, David Hocking, Anouar Teriaky, Karim Qumosani, Qasim Khan, Ephraim Tang, Anton Skaro, Juan Pablo Arab, Mayur Brahmania\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/canlivj-2024-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde transvenous obliteration is an endovascular interventional radiology procedure demonstrating safety and efficacy for secondary prophylaxis in high-risk gastric varices. However, its efficacy as primary prophylaxis is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and case series to evaluate the utility of this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search utilized EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Inclusion criteria involved single technique obliteration, known varices, and exclusively primary prophylaxis. The primary outcome was gastric variceal bleeding, with secondary outcomes of technical success, variceal eradication, adverse events, and mortality. A retrospective case series of nine patients who underwent primary prophylaxis at our North American centre was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 842 articles retrieved, 69 were eligible for full-text review, with the 9 studies included in the final analysis involving balloon-occluded, but not plug-assisted or coil-assisted, techniques. Only 2/9 studies involved comparator groups, with a single prospective non-randomized trial, and there was a high risk of bias in 8/9 studies. The technical success rate of the balloon-occluded obliteration technique ranged from 82% to 100%, and the variceal eradication rate ranged from 88% to 100%. In comparative studies, patients had decreased variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality compared with control cohorts. Our case series demonstrated a 78% survival rate with no variceal bleeding. Post-procedure ascites and worsening esophageal varices ranged from 0-55% to 11-80%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review summarizes evidence regarding the efficacy of retrograde transvenous obliteration, with available studies demonstrating a high success rate in eradicating varices and preventing bleeding-associated mortality, albeit with concerns of overall quality of existing literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":510884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"79-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2024-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:逆行经静脉闭塞术是一种血管内介入放射学手术,在高危胃静脉曲张二级预防中显示出安全性和有效性。然而,其作为初级预防的功效尚不确定。我们进行了系统回顾和案例系列来评估该技术的实用性。方法:利用EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库进行文献检索。纳入标准包括单一技术阻断、已知静脉曲张和完全初级预防。主要结局是胃静脉曲张出血,次要结局是技术成功、静脉曲张根除、不良事件和死亡率。我们还对在我们北美中心接受初级预防治疗的9例患者进行了回顾性病例系列研究。结果:在检索到的842篇文章中,69篇符合全文综述的条件,其中9篇纳入最终分析的研究涉及球囊闭塞技术,但不包括塞或线圈辅助技术。只有2/9的研究涉及比较组,只有一项前瞻性非随机试验,8/9的研究存在高偏倚风险。球囊闭塞闭塞技术的技术成功率为82% ~ 100%,静脉曲张根除率为88% ~ 100%。在比较研究中,与对照组相比,患者的静脉曲张出血和出血相关死亡率降低。我们的病例系列显示78%的生存率无静脉曲张出血。术后腹水和食管静脉曲张恶化的发生率分别为0-55%至11-80%。结论:本综述总结了关于逆行经静脉闭塞术疗效的证据,现有研究表明在根除静脉曲张和预防出血相关死亡率方面具有很高的成功率,尽管存在现有文献的总体质量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Primary Prophylaxis of Gastric Variceal Bleeding.

Background: Retrograde transvenous obliteration is an endovascular interventional radiology procedure demonstrating safety and efficacy for secondary prophylaxis in high-risk gastric varices. However, its efficacy as primary prophylaxis is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and case series to evaluate the utility of this technique.

Methods: A literature search utilized EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Inclusion criteria involved single technique obliteration, known varices, and exclusively primary prophylaxis. The primary outcome was gastric variceal bleeding, with secondary outcomes of technical success, variceal eradication, adverse events, and mortality. A retrospective case series of nine patients who underwent primary prophylaxis at our North American centre was also conducted.

Results: Of the 842 articles retrieved, 69 were eligible for full-text review, with the 9 studies included in the final analysis involving balloon-occluded, but not plug-assisted or coil-assisted, techniques. Only 2/9 studies involved comparator groups, with a single prospective non-randomized trial, and there was a high risk of bias in 8/9 studies. The technical success rate of the balloon-occluded obliteration technique ranged from 82% to 100%, and the variceal eradication rate ranged from 88% to 100%. In comparative studies, patients had decreased variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality compared with control cohorts. Our case series demonstrated a 78% survival rate with no variceal bleeding. Post-procedure ascites and worsening esophageal varices ranged from 0-55% to 11-80%, respectively.

Conclusion: This review summarizes evidence regarding the efficacy of retrograde transvenous obliteration, with available studies demonstrating a high success rate in eradicating varices and preventing bleeding-associated mortality, albeit with concerns of overall quality of existing literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信