基于梯度一致性模型的多视差估计。

IF 13.7
James Lyndon Gray;Aous Thabit Naman;David S. Taubman
{"title":"基于梯度一致性模型的多视差估计。","authors":"James Lyndon Gray;Aous Thabit Naman;David S. Taubman","doi":"10.1109/TIP.2025.3588322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variational approaches to disparity estimation typically use a linearised brightness constancy constraint, which only applies in smooth regions and over small distances. Accordingly, current variational approaches rely on a schedule to progressively include image data. This paper proposes the use of Gradient Consistency information to assess the validity of the linearisation; this information is used to determine the weights applied to the data term as part of an analytically inspired Gradient Consistency Model. The Gradient Consistency Model penalises the data term for view pairs that have a mismatch between the spatial gradients in the source view and the spatial gradients in the target view. Instead of relying on a tuned or learned schedule, the Gradient Consistency Model is self-scheduling, since the weights evolve as the algorithm progresses. We show that the Gradient Consistency Model outperforms standard coarse-to-fine schemes and the recently proposed progressive inclusion of views approach in both rate of convergence and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":94032,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society","volume":"34 ","pages":"4676-4690"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-View Disparity Estimation Using the Gradient Consistency Model\",\"authors\":\"James Lyndon Gray;Aous Thabit Naman;David S. Taubman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIP.2025.3588322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Variational approaches to disparity estimation typically use a linearised brightness constancy constraint, which only applies in smooth regions and over small distances. Accordingly, current variational approaches rely on a schedule to progressively include image data. This paper proposes the use of Gradient Consistency information to assess the validity of the linearisation; this information is used to determine the weights applied to the data term as part of an analytically inspired Gradient Consistency Model. The Gradient Consistency Model penalises the data term for view pairs that have a mismatch between the spatial gradients in the source view and the spatial gradients in the target view. Instead of relying on a tuned or learned schedule, the Gradient Consistency Model is self-scheduling, since the weights evolve as the algorithm progresses. We show that the Gradient Consistency Model outperforms standard coarse-to-fine schemes and the recently proposed progressive inclusion of views approach in both rate of convergence and accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"4676-4690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11083665/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11083665/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视差估计的变分方法通常使用线性化的亮度常数约束,这只适用于光滑区域和小距离。因此,当前的变分方法依赖于一个时间表来逐步包括图像数据。本文提出使用梯度一致性信息来评估线性化的有效性;该信息用于确定应用于数据项的权重,作为分析启发的梯度一致性模型的一部分。对于源视图中的空间梯度与目标视图中的空间梯度不匹配的视图对,梯度一致性模型会对数据项进行惩罚。梯度一致性模型是自调度的,而不是依赖于调优的或学习的调度,因为权重随着算法的进展而变化。我们证明了梯度一致性模型在收敛速度和精度上都优于标准的粗到精方案和最近提出的渐进式视图包含方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-View Disparity Estimation Using the Gradient Consistency Model
Variational approaches to disparity estimation typically use a linearised brightness constancy constraint, which only applies in smooth regions and over small distances. Accordingly, current variational approaches rely on a schedule to progressively include image data. This paper proposes the use of Gradient Consistency information to assess the validity of the linearisation; this information is used to determine the weights applied to the data term as part of an analytically inspired Gradient Consistency Model. The Gradient Consistency Model penalises the data term for view pairs that have a mismatch between the spatial gradients in the source view and the spatial gradients in the target view. Instead of relying on a tuned or learned schedule, the Gradient Consistency Model is self-scheduling, since the weights evolve as the algorithm progresses. We show that the Gradient Consistency Model outperforms standard coarse-to-fine schemes and the recently proposed progressive inclusion of views approach in both rate of convergence and accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信