评估桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板后日常活动有限负荷的安全性。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nikolas H Kazmers, Hernan Roca, Gretchen Maughan-Egbert, Miranda J Rogers
{"title":"评估桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板后日常活动有限负荷的安全性。","authors":"Nikolas H Kazmers, Hernan Roca, Gretchen Maughan-Egbert, Miranda J Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures worldwide. Treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is typically followed by a period of weight-bearing limitations. We hypothesized that (1) allowing patients to load bear for activities of daily living (ADLs) following ORIF of select fracture patterns would not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment and (2) a low rate of complications including revision ORIF would be observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of adults (≥18 years old) with DRFs treated with ORIF was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. A chart review was performed to identify patients permitted to load bear for ADLs and exclude patients with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification C3 and A3 fractures (multifragmentary articular and metaphysis, respectively), volar shear fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification B1-3), volar ulnar corner fractures, and patients with polytrauma or additional ipsilateral injuries. We defined \"select patients\" as those with fracture types not listed in the exclusion criteria. Radial height, ulnar variance, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were measured by two blinded reviewers. Paired equivalence tests were conducted to evaluate differences between intraoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements (using measurement errors from the literature as upper- and lower-limit thresholds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 66 included patients, mean age was 51 ± 19 years, and 68% (45/66) were women. One patient underwent bilateral ORIF, resulting in 67 cases, of which 17 (25%) were extra-articular, 16 (24%) were two-fragment intra-articular, and 34 (51%) had three intra-articular fragments. No immediate postoperative complications (including implant failure/migration or revision ORIF) were observed within 5 weeks of early load bearing for ADLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited load bearing for ADLs following ORIF of DRFs with select fracture patterns did not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment, loss of reduction, or the need for revision ORIF.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Safety of Limited Load Bearing for Activities of Daily Living Following Volar Locked Plating of Select Distal Radius Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolas H Kazmers, Hernan Roca, Gretchen Maughan-Egbert, Miranda J Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.05.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures worldwide. Treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is typically followed by a period of weight-bearing limitations. We hypothesized that (1) allowing patients to load bear for activities of daily living (ADLs) following ORIF of select fracture patterns would not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment and (2) a low rate of complications including revision ORIF would be observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of adults (≥18 years old) with DRFs treated with ORIF was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. A chart review was performed to identify patients permitted to load bear for ADLs and exclude patients with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification C3 and A3 fractures (multifragmentary articular and metaphysis, respectively), volar shear fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification B1-3), volar ulnar corner fractures, and patients with polytrauma or additional ipsilateral injuries. We defined \\\"select patients\\\" as those with fracture types not listed in the exclusion criteria. Radial height, ulnar variance, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were measured by two blinded reviewers. Paired equivalence tests were conducted to evaluate differences between intraoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements (using measurement errors from the literature as upper- and lower-limit thresholds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 66 included patients, mean age was 51 ± 19 years, and 68% (45/66) were women. One patient underwent bilateral ORIF, resulting in 67 cases, of which 17 (25%) were extra-articular, 16 (24%) were two-fragment intra-articular, and 34 (51%) had three intra-articular fragments. No immediate postoperative complications (including implant failure/migration or revision ORIF) were observed within 5 weeks of early load bearing for ADLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited load bearing for ADLs following ORIF of DRFs with select fracture patterns did not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment, loss of reduction, or the need for revision ORIF.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.05.020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.05.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:桡骨远端骨折是世界范围内最常见的骨折。切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗后通常会有一段时间的负重限制。我们假设:(1)允许患者在选择骨折类型的ORIF后负重进行日常生活活动(ADLs)不会导致影像学对齐的临床相关变化;(2)将观察到包括翻修ORIF在内的低并发症发生率。方法:使用现行程序术语代码对接受ORIF治疗的DRFs成人(≥18岁)进行回顾性分析。通过回顾性分析,确定了允许承受adl负荷的患者,排除了Arbeitsgemeinschaft f骨合成骨折分类C3和A3骨折(分别为多碎片性关节和干骺端)、掌侧剪切骨折(Arbeitsgemeinschaft f骨合成骨折分类B1-3)、掌侧尺角骨折以及多发创伤或附加同侧损伤的患者。我们将“选择患者”定义为排除标准中未列出的骨折类型。桡骨高度、尺骨方差、桡骨倾斜度、掌侧倾斜和关节内台阶由两位盲法评价者测量。采用配对等效检验来评估术中和术后x线测量的差异(使用文献中的测量误差作为上限和下限阈值)。结果:66例患者平均年龄51±19岁,女性占68%(45/66)。1例患者行双侧ORIF,共67例,其中17例(25%)为关节外碎片,16例(24%)为关节内两碎片,34例(51%)为关节内三碎片。在adl的早期负重5周内没有观察到立即的术后并发症(包括种植体失败/移位或ORIF翻修)。结论:选择骨折类型的DRFs进行ORIF后,adl的有限负荷承受不会导致影像学对齐、复位丢失或需要修改ORIF的临床相关变化。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Safety of Limited Load Bearing for Activities of Daily Living Following Volar Locked Plating of Select Distal Radius Fractures.

Purpose: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures worldwide. Treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is typically followed by a period of weight-bearing limitations. We hypothesized that (1) allowing patients to load bear for activities of daily living (ADLs) following ORIF of select fracture patterns would not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment and (2) a low rate of complications including revision ORIF would be observed.

Methods: A retrospective review of adults (≥18 years old) with DRFs treated with ORIF was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. A chart review was performed to identify patients permitted to load bear for ADLs and exclude patients with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification C3 and A3 fractures (multifragmentary articular and metaphysis, respectively), volar shear fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesenfragen classification B1-3), volar ulnar corner fractures, and patients with polytrauma or additional ipsilateral injuries. We defined "select patients" as those with fracture types not listed in the exclusion criteria. Radial height, ulnar variance, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were measured by two blinded reviewers. Paired equivalence tests were conducted to evaluate differences between intraoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements (using measurement errors from the literature as upper- and lower-limit thresholds).

Results: Of the 66 included patients, mean age was 51 ± 19 years, and 68% (45/66) were women. One patient underwent bilateral ORIF, resulting in 67 cases, of which 17 (25%) were extra-articular, 16 (24%) were two-fragment intra-articular, and 34 (51%) had three intra-articular fragments. No immediate postoperative complications (including implant failure/migration or revision ORIF) were observed within 5 weeks of early load bearing for ADLs.

Conclusions: Limited load bearing for ADLs following ORIF of DRFs with select fracture patterns did not lead to clinically relevant changes in radiographic alignment, loss of reduction, or the need for revision ORIF.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信