{"title":"低剂量美沙酮联合持续阿片类药物治疗不受控制的癌症疼痛的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签单组研究","authors":"Takaaki Hasegawa, Toru Okuyama, Nana Suzuki, Yosuke Furukawa, Yoshihiko Tasaki, Moeko Iida, Asako Ito, Megumi Uchida, Yosuke Kubota, Shino Kikuchi, Hideo Yamakawa, Yoshihiko Harada, Tatsuo Akechi","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacological options for refractory cancer pain are limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of low-dose methadone and ongoing opioid treatment for uncontrolled cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, open-label study. Participants were patients with uncontrolled cancer pain despite dose titration of opioids. Patients received low-dose methadone (starting dose of 5 or 10 mg/day) combined with another ongoing opioid therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders (defined as ≥33% reduction in average pain intensity on the numerical rating scale [NRS]) on day 15. Pain intensity and adverse events according to the Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were evaluated at baseline, on days 8 and 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients participated in this study, 11 (57.9%) of whom had neuropathic pain. The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose before combination was 112.6 mg. The primary outcome occurred in 13 (68.4%) of patients (95% CI, 43.4 to 87.4). The mean average NRS was 5.9 at baseline, which decreased significantly to 4.2 and 3.3 on days 8 and 15 (P < .001), respectively. The worst pain intensity on NRS decreased significantly over time. Adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, and somnolence, which were new or had worsened from baseline, were reported in 26.3%, 26.3%, 5.3%, and 26.3%, respectively. Delirium was observed in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose methadone with ongoing opioid treatment shows potential efficacy in the management of uncontrolled pain with acceptable adverse events.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: </strong>UMIN000038924.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of combining low-dose methadone with ongoing opioid treatment for uncontrolled cancer pain: an open-label single-arm study.\",\"authors\":\"Takaaki Hasegawa, Toru Okuyama, Nana Suzuki, Yosuke Furukawa, Yoshihiko Tasaki, Moeko Iida, Asako Ito, Megumi Uchida, Yosuke Kubota, Shino Kikuchi, Hideo Yamakawa, Yoshihiko Harada, Tatsuo Akechi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacological options for refractory cancer pain are limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of low-dose methadone and ongoing opioid treatment for uncontrolled cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, open-label study. Participants were patients with uncontrolled cancer pain despite dose titration of opioids. Patients received low-dose methadone (starting dose of 5 or 10 mg/day) combined with another ongoing opioid therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders (defined as ≥33% reduction in average pain intensity on the numerical rating scale [NRS]) on day 15. Pain intensity and adverse events according to the Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were evaluated at baseline, on days 8 and 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients participated in this study, 11 (57.9%) of whom had neuropathic pain. The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose before combination was 112.6 mg. The primary outcome occurred in 13 (68.4%) of patients (95% CI, 43.4 to 87.4). The mean average NRS was 5.9 at baseline, which decreased significantly to 4.2 and 3.3 on days 8 and 15 (P < .001), respectively. The worst pain intensity on NRS decreased significantly over time. Adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, and somnolence, which were new or had worsened from baseline, were reported in 26.3%, 26.3%, 5.3%, and 26.3%, respectively. Delirium was observed in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose methadone with ongoing opioid treatment shows potential efficacy in the management of uncontrolled pain with acceptable adverse events.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: </strong>UMIN000038924.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of combining low-dose methadone with ongoing opioid treatment for uncontrolled cancer pain: an open-label single-arm study.
Background: Pharmacological options for refractory cancer pain are limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of low-dose methadone and ongoing opioid treatment for uncontrolled cancer pain.
Methods: This was a prospective, open-label study. Participants were patients with uncontrolled cancer pain despite dose titration of opioids. Patients received low-dose methadone (starting dose of 5 or 10 mg/day) combined with another ongoing opioid therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders (defined as ≥33% reduction in average pain intensity on the numerical rating scale [NRS]) on day 15. Pain intensity and adverse events according to the Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were evaluated at baseline, on days 8 and 15.
Results: Nineteen patients participated in this study, 11 (57.9%) of whom had neuropathic pain. The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose before combination was 112.6 mg. The primary outcome occurred in 13 (68.4%) of patients (95% CI, 43.4 to 87.4). The mean average NRS was 5.9 at baseline, which decreased significantly to 4.2 and 3.3 on days 8 and 15 (P < .001), respectively. The worst pain intensity on NRS decreased significantly over time. Adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, and somnolence, which were new or had worsened from baseline, were reported in 26.3%, 26.3%, 5.3%, and 26.3%, respectively. Delirium was observed in one patient.
Conclusion: Low-dose methadone with ongoing opioid treatment shows potential efficacy in the management of uncontrolled pain with acceptable adverse events.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.