Sıdıka Pelit Aksu , Serap Alkaş , Şengül Yaman Sözbir
{"title":"乳腺癌和妇科癌症获益发现量表:土耳其效度和信度研究。","authors":"Sıdıka Pelit Aksu , Serap Alkaş , Şengül Yaman Sözbir","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the “Benefit Finding Scale” (BFS) in Turkish breast and gynecologic cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the methodological research, 322 women were included. Data was collected using the “Descriptive Information Form” and the “BFS.” The language, content, construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the “BFS” were examined. Content validity was assessed using the scale and the item content validity index. Construct validity was determined by Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s <em>α</em>, and the test-retest method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established that the scale consisted of 15 items with three factors, explaining 72.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Goodness of Fit Index: 0.96, AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08. The Cronbach’s <em>α</em> for the total scale is 0.92. Within the scope of the test-retest analysis, an interclass correlation coefficient = 0.961 was determined. The scale evaluation is based on the mean scores of the subdimensions and total scores; as the score obtained from the scale increases, the benefit finding for cancer increases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings from this study conducted on a sample of breast and gynecologic cancer showed that the “BFS” is both valid and reliable for the Turkish population.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Assessing benefit findings in women with breast and gynecologic cancer may enable nurses to provide care and psychosocial support tailored to patient’s needs, which can enhance their well-being and improve treatment adherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 151949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast and Gynecological Cancer Benefit Finding Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study\",\"authors\":\"Sıdıka Pelit Aksu , Serap Alkaş , Şengül Yaman Sözbir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the “Benefit Finding Scale” (BFS) in Turkish breast and gynecologic cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the methodological research, 322 women were included. Data was collected using the “Descriptive Information Form” and the “BFS.” The language, content, construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the “BFS” were examined. Content validity was assessed using the scale and the item content validity index. Construct validity was determined by Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s <em>α</em>, and the test-retest method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established that the scale consisted of 15 items with three factors, explaining 72.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Goodness of Fit Index: 0.96, AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08. The Cronbach’s <em>α</em> for the total scale is 0.92. Within the scope of the test-retest analysis, an interclass correlation coefficient = 0.961 was determined. The scale evaluation is based on the mean scores of the subdimensions and total scores; as the score obtained from the scale increases, the benefit finding for cancer increases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings from this study conducted on a sample of breast and gynecologic cancer showed that the “BFS” is both valid and reliable for the Turkish population.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Assessing benefit findings in women with breast and gynecologic cancer may enable nurses to provide care and psychosocial support tailored to patient’s needs, which can enhance their well-being and improve treatment adherence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 151949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125001421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125001421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast and Gynecological Cancer Benefit Finding Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
Objectives
This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the “Benefit Finding Scale” (BFS) in Turkish breast and gynecologic cancer patients.
Methods
In the methodological research, 322 women were included. Data was collected using the “Descriptive Information Form” and the “BFS.” The language, content, construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the “BFS” were examined. Content validity was assessed using the scale and the item content validity index. Construct validity was determined by Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s α, and the test-retest method.
Results
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established that the scale consisted of 15 items with three factors, explaining 72.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Goodness of Fit Index: 0.96, AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08. The Cronbach’s α for the total scale is 0.92. Within the scope of the test-retest analysis, an interclass correlation coefficient = 0.961 was determined. The scale evaluation is based on the mean scores of the subdimensions and total scores; as the score obtained from the scale increases, the benefit finding for cancer increases.
Conclusions
The findings from this study conducted on a sample of breast and gynecologic cancer showed that the “BFS” is both valid and reliable for the Turkish population.
Implications for Nursing Practice
Assessing benefit findings in women with breast and gynecologic cancer may enable nurses to provide care and psychosocial support tailored to patient’s needs, which can enhance their well-being and improve treatment adherence.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.