[COVID-19感染后卫生保健和社会工作者的康复:回顾性横断面研究的结果]。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2633-6179
Svenja Mertens, Albert Nienhaus, Matthias Morfeld, Claudia Westermann, Uwe Koch-Gromus
{"title":"[COVID-19感染后卫生保健和社会工作者的康复:回顾性横断面研究的结果]。","authors":"Svenja Mertens, Albert Nienhaus, Matthias Morfeld, Claudia Westermann, Uwe Koch-Gromus","doi":"10.1055/a-2633-6179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers showed a twofold increased risk of infection. Many still report persisting symptoms a few months after initial infection such as fatigue, headaches and cognitive impairment, often resulting in incapacity to work and reduced ability to carry out tasks of everyday life. When such symptoms persist for longer than three months, it is known as post-covid-syndrome (PCS). Only a few studies have evaluated outpatient rehabilitation for post-covid conditions. The objective of this study was to assess patient experience and satisfaction with rehabilitation measures.In November 2022, insured healthcare workers were asked to participate in a retrospective cross-sectional study via paper-pencil survey. The survey included sociodemographic and job-related information, acute and persisting COVID-19 symptoms, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation measures, and their subjective experience of those measures. Data interpretation followed a descriptive analysis, while analysis of variances was used to identify significant differences.Out of the 394 people contacted, n=211 participated in the survey (response rate: 53.6%). No or mild PCS could not be found in the sample; 4.9% showed moderate and 95.1% severe PCS. In total, n=194 people reported having undergone rehabilitation measures, with 16.5% receiving outpatient and 23.7% receiving inpatient rehabilitation; 59.8% reported rehabilitation in both settings. Of the participants, 114 (65.9%) reported subjective improvement of their symptoms following rehabilitation measures. The analysis of variance did not show a significant difference between settings (p=0.054).The findings indicate that patients still experience a high burden due to persisting symptoms, but many of them report a subjectively perceived improvement of symptoms following rehabilitation measures. In this survey, outpatient rehabilitation was used mainly as follow-up after inpatient care and was essential for maintaining any improvement achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rehabilitation of Health Care and Social Workers after COVID-19 Infection: Results of a Retrospective Cross-sectional Study].\",\"authors\":\"Svenja Mertens, Albert Nienhaus, Matthias Morfeld, Claudia Westermann, Uwe Koch-Gromus\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2633-6179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers showed a twofold increased risk of infection. Many still report persisting symptoms a few months after initial infection such as fatigue, headaches and cognitive impairment, often resulting in incapacity to work and reduced ability to carry out tasks of everyday life. When such symptoms persist for longer than three months, it is known as post-covid-syndrome (PCS). Only a few studies have evaluated outpatient rehabilitation for post-covid conditions. The objective of this study was to assess patient experience and satisfaction with rehabilitation measures.In November 2022, insured healthcare workers were asked to participate in a retrospective cross-sectional study via paper-pencil survey. The survey included sociodemographic and job-related information, acute and persisting COVID-19 symptoms, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation measures, and their subjective experience of those measures. Data interpretation followed a descriptive analysis, while analysis of variances was used to identify significant differences.Out of the 394 people contacted, n=211 participated in the survey (response rate: 53.6%). No or mild PCS could not be found in the sample; 4.9% showed moderate and 95.1% severe PCS. In total, n=194 people reported having undergone rehabilitation measures, with 16.5% receiving outpatient and 23.7% receiving inpatient rehabilitation; 59.8% reported rehabilitation in both settings. Of the participants, 114 (65.9%) reported subjective improvement of their symptoms following rehabilitation measures. The analysis of variance did not show a significant difference between settings (p=0.054).The findings indicate that patients still experience a high burden due to persisting symptoms, but many of them report a subjectively perceived improvement of symptoms following rehabilitation measures. In this survey, outpatient rehabilitation was used mainly as follow-up after inpatient care and was essential for maintaining any improvement achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2633-6179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2633-6179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在COVID-19大流行期间,卫生保健工作者的感染风险增加了一倍。许多人在初次感染后几个月仍报告出现持续症状,如疲劳、头痛和认知障碍,往往导致丧失工作能力和执行日常生活任务的能力下降。如果症状持续3个月以上,就被称为“后冠状病毒综合征”(PCS)。只有少数研究评估了covid后疾病的门诊康复。本研究的目的是评估患者对康复措施的体验和满意度。2022年11月,有保险的医护人员被要求通过纸笔调查参与回顾性横断面研究。调查内容包括社会人口统计和工作相关信息、COVID-19急性和持续性症状、住院和门诊康复措施以及他们对这些措施的主观体验。数据解释遵循描述性分析,而方差分析用于识别显著差异。在联系的394人中,有211人参与了调查(回复率为53.6%)。样品中没有或没有轻度PCS;中度为4.9%,重度为95.1%。共有n=194人报告接受了康复措施,其中16.5%接受了门诊康复,23.7%接受了住院康复;59.8%的人报告在两种环境中康复。在参与者中,114人(65.9%)报告在采取康复措施后主观症状有所改善。方差分析显示各组间无显著差异(p=0.054)。研究结果表明,由于症状持续存在,患者仍然承受着很高的负担,但他们中的许多人报告说,在采取康复措施后,他们主观地认为症状有所改善。在本调查中,门诊康复主要用于住院治疗后的随访,对于维持任何取得的改善至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Rehabilitation of Health Care and Social Workers after COVID-19 Infection: Results of a Retrospective Cross-sectional Study].

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers showed a twofold increased risk of infection. Many still report persisting symptoms a few months after initial infection such as fatigue, headaches and cognitive impairment, often resulting in incapacity to work and reduced ability to carry out tasks of everyday life. When such symptoms persist for longer than three months, it is known as post-covid-syndrome (PCS). Only a few studies have evaluated outpatient rehabilitation for post-covid conditions. The objective of this study was to assess patient experience and satisfaction with rehabilitation measures.In November 2022, insured healthcare workers were asked to participate in a retrospective cross-sectional study via paper-pencil survey. The survey included sociodemographic and job-related information, acute and persisting COVID-19 symptoms, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation measures, and their subjective experience of those measures. Data interpretation followed a descriptive analysis, while analysis of variances was used to identify significant differences.Out of the 394 people contacted, n=211 participated in the survey (response rate: 53.6%). No or mild PCS could not be found in the sample; 4.9% showed moderate and 95.1% severe PCS. In total, n=194 people reported having undergone rehabilitation measures, with 16.5% receiving outpatient and 23.7% receiving inpatient rehabilitation; 59.8% reported rehabilitation in both settings. Of the participants, 114 (65.9%) reported subjective improvement of their symptoms following rehabilitation measures. The analysis of variance did not show a significant difference between settings (p=0.054).The findings indicate that patients still experience a high burden due to persisting symptoms, but many of them report a subjectively perceived improvement of symptoms following rehabilitation measures. In this survey, outpatient rehabilitation was used mainly as follow-up after inpatient care and was essential for maintaining any improvement achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信