[药物使用障碍医疗康复期间和之后以工作为导向的病例管理的过程和结果:BORA-TB项目的讲习班报告]。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2624-8247
Helen Gissendanner, Thorsten Meyer-Feil
{"title":"[药物使用障碍医疗康复期间和之后以工作为导向的病例管理的过程和结果:BORA-TB项目的讲习班报告]。","authors":"Helen Gissendanner, Thorsten Meyer-Feil","doi":"10.1055/a-2624-8247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case workers in a vocational support program for persons with addiction disorders (\"BORA-TB\") accompanied rehabilitants for up to 12 months after rehabilitation treatment. Positive return-to-work (RTW) effects were not statistically verifiable using survey data from the evaluation study. This raises the question of methodological adjustments to the assessment of outcomes. The work summarized here sought to identify and analyze the different paths along which consultation interactions progressed, including the different forms of outcomes they terminated in, to reach an understanding of how these can be influenced by or understood through individual and contextual factors.For the analysis of n=50 individual consultations, data taken from the primary documentation of services received by clients as reported by case managers were combined with statistical measures and free-hand text notes from clients' self-report questionnaires. These data were reiteratively compared within and between cases following the principles of Grounded Theory.Eleven types of consultation processes were differentiated. Each represents a specific pattern of case manager tasks and methods, forms of (possible) outcomes, and prognoses for disease management in relation to the client's situation at the start of consultation and to personal characteristics. The wide range of reported case management tasks included praise for independently achieved vocational successes, legal support, and analyses of clients' personality characteristics for (change) motivation. Outcomes differed depending on client´s life situation and needs, yet is always defined as greater participation in vocational and social environments. Prognoses for each type taking into consideration variation in consultation processes and forms of outcomes suggest hypotheses about suitable disease management.Alternative approaches to the evaluation of outcomes in caseworkers' support of persons with addiction disorders appear feasible with available data on consultation processes. They also seem appropriate given the heterogeneity of affected persons' situations. A validation of the approach used here and a quantitative analysis of type distributions could yield more suitable instruments for measuring treatment outcomes in addiction research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Processes and Outcomes of Work-Oriented Case Management during and after Medical Rehabilitation for Substance Use Disorders: A Workshop Report from the BORA-TB Project].\",\"authors\":\"Helen Gissendanner, Thorsten Meyer-Feil\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2624-8247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Case workers in a vocational support program for persons with addiction disorders (\\\"BORA-TB\\\") accompanied rehabilitants for up to 12 months after rehabilitation treatment. Positive return-to-work (RTW) effects were not statistically verifiable using survey data from the evaluation study. This raises the question of methodological adjustments to the assessment of outcomes. The work summarized here sought to identify and analyze the different paths along which consultation interactions progressed, including the different forms of outcomes they terminated in, to reach an understanding of how these can be influenced by or understood through individual and contextual factors.For the analysis of n=50 individual consultations, data taken from the primary documentation of services received by clients as reported by case managers were combined with statistical measures and free-hand text notes from clients' self-report questionnaires. These data were reiteratively compared within and between cases following the principles of Grounded Theory.Eleven types of consultation processes were differentiated. Each represents a specific pattern of case manager tasks and methods, forms of (possible) outcomes, and prognoses for disease management in relation to the client's situation at the start of consultation and to personal characteristics. The wide range of reported case management tasks included praise for independently achieved vocational successes, legal support, and analyses of clients' personality characteristics for (change) motivation. Outcomes differed depending on client´s life situation and needs, yet is always defined as greater participation in vocational and social environments. Prognoses for each type taking into consideration variation in consultation processes and forms of outcomes suggest hypotheses about suitable disease management.Alternative approaches to the evaluation of outcomes in caseworkers' support of persons with addiction disorders appear feasible with available data on consultation processes. They also seem appropriate given the heterogeneity of affected persons' situations. A validation of the approach used here and a quantitative analysis of type distributions could yield more suitable instruments for measuring treatment outcomes in addiction research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2624-8247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2624-8247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成瘾障碍患者职业支持项目(BORA-TB)的个案工作者在康复治疗后陪伴康复者长达12个月。正面的重返工作(RTW)效应不能用评估研究的调查数据进行统计验证。这就提出了对评估结果进行方法调整的问题。本文总结的工作旨在确定和分析磋商互动进展的不同路径,包括它们终止的不同形式的结果,以了解这些路径如何受到个人因素和环境因素的影响或通过个人因素和环境因素的理解。为了分析n=50个个人咨询,从病例管理人员报告的客户接受服务的主要文件中获取的数据与统计测量和客户自我报告问卷中的手写文本笔记相结合。根据扎根理论的原则,这些数据在案例内部和案例之间反复进行比较。协商过程分为11种类型。每一个代表了一个特定模式的病例管理员的任务和方法,形式(可能的)结果,和预后的疾病管理与客户的情况在咨询开始和个人特征。报告的案例管理任务范围广泛,包括表扬独立取得的职业成功、法律支持和分析客户的个性特征(改变)动机。结果取决于客户的生活状况和需求,但总是被定义为更多地参与职业和社会环境。考虑到会诊过程和结果形式的差异,每种类型的预后提出了关于适当疾病管理的假设。根据有关咨询过程的现有数据,评估社会工作者对成瘾障碍患者的支持结果的其他方法似乎是可行的。考虑到受影响人员情况的异质性,它们似乎也是适当的。对这里使用的方法的验证和类型分布的定量分析可以产生更合适的工具来衡量成瘾研究中的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Processes and Outcomes of Work-Oriented Case Management during and after Medical Rehabilitation for Substance Use Disorders: A Workshop Report from the BORA-TB Project].

Case workers in a vocational support program for persons with addiction disorders ("BORA-TB") accompanied rehabilitants for up to 12 months after rehabilitation treatment. Positive return-to-work (RTW) effects were not statistically verifiable using survey data from the evaluation study. This raises the question of methodological adjustments to the assessment of outcomes. The work summarized here sought to identify and analyze the different paths along which consultation interactions progressed, including the different forms of outcomes they terminated in, to reach an understanding of how these can be influenced by or understood through individual and contextual factors.For the analysis of n=50 individual consultations, data taken from the primary documentation of services received by clients as reported by case managers were combined with statistical measures and free-hand text notes from clients' self-report questionnaires. These data were reiteratively compared within and between cases following the principles of Grounded Theory.Eleven types of consultation processes were differentiated. Each represents a specific pattern of case manager tasks and methods, forms of (possible) outcomes, and prognoses for disease management in relation to the client's situation at the start of consultation and to personal characteristics. The wide range of reported case management tasks included praise for independently achieved vocational successes, legal support, and analyses of clients' personality characteristics for (change) motivation. Outcomes differed depending on client´s life situation and needs, yet is always defined as greater participation in vocational and social environments. Prognoses for each type taking into consideration variation in consultation processes and forms of outcomes suggest hypotheses about suitable disease management.Alternative approaches to the evaluation of outcomes in caseworkers' support of persons with addiction disorders appear feasible with available data on consultation processes. They also seem appropriate given the heterogeneity of affected persons' situations. A validation of the approach used here and a quantitative analysis of type distributions could yield more suitable instruments for measuring treatment outcomes in addiction research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信