用两种粘结强度试验比较不同制造工艺制备的陶瓷与合金的粘结性。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elie E Daou, Nadim Z Baba
{"title":"用两种粘结强度试验比较不同制造工艺制备的陶瓷与合金的粘结性。","authors":"Elie E Daou, Nadim Z Baba","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Schwickerath (ST) tests for the adherence of ceramic to cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated by different techniques, zirconia, and nickel chromium alloys.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five different core/veneer combinations were prepared: Group SLM: selective laser melted Co-Cr; Group SM: soft milled Co-Cr; Group C: cast Co-Cr; Group Zi: soft milled zirconia; and Group Ni: cast nickel chromium, layered with ceramic. Disk-shaped specimens (diameter 15 mm, thickness 2 mm) with a ceramic thickness of 2 mm were prepared for SBS, and bars of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm with applied ceramic of 8 × 3 mm for ST (N = 100 and n = 20/group). Only half of the specimens from each group were thermocycled (5-55°C/5000 times). SBS test was applied to all the disks, and ST to the bars. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values, including shape (m) and scale (σ0), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thermal cycling had only a significant effect on SBS results for the SLM group (p = 0.017). A significant difference was found between testing techniques and materials (p < 0.001). The lowest value was reported for SLM in the SBS method (p < 0.001). Failure types were mostly mixed in SBS and adhesive in ST. The highest Weibull parameters were obtained for group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the testing methodology and the specimens manufacturing technique influenced the bond strength of ceramic to different alloys. The aging process influenced the results in the laser-sintered group in large specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the ceramic adherence to alloys fabricated by different manufacturing techniques using two bond strength tests.\",\"authors\":\"Elie E Daou, Nadim Z Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.14082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Schwickerath (ST) tests for the adherence of ceramic to cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated by different techniques, zirconia, and nickel chromium alloys.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Five different core/veneer combinations were prepared: Group SLM: selective laser melted Co-Cr; Group SM: soft milled Co-Cr; Group C: cast Co-Cr; Group Zi: soft milled zirconia; and Group Ni: cast nickel chromium, layered with ceramic. Disk-shaped specimens (diameter 15 mm, thickness 2 mm) with a ceramic thickness of 2 mm were prepared for SBS, and bars of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm with applied ceramic of 8 × 3 mm for ST (N = 100 and n = 20/group). Only half of the specimens from each group were thermocycled (5-55°C/5000 times). SBS test was applied to all the disks, and ST to the bars. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values, including shape (m) and scale (σ0), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thermal cycling had only a significant effect on SBS results for the SLM group (p = 0.017). A significant difference was found between testing techniques and materials (p < 0.001). The lowest value was reported for SLM in the SBS method (p < 0.001). Failure types were mostly mixed in SBS and adhesive in ST. The highest Weibull parameters were obtained for group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the testing methodology and the specimens manufacturing technique influenced the bond strength of ceramic to different alloys. The aging process influenced the results in the laser-sintered group in large specimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较陶瓷与不同工艺制备的钴铬(Co-Cr)、氧化锆和镍铬合金的剪切结合强度(SBS)和施维克拉特(ST)试验。材料和方法:制备了五种不同的芯/单板组合:SLM组:选择性激光熔化Co-Cr;SM组:软磨Co-Cr;C组:铸Co-Cr;子组:软磨氧化锆;和组镍:铸造镍铬,与陶瓷层。SBS制备直径15 mm,厚度2 mm的圆盘状试样,陶瓷厚度2 mm; ST制备25 × 3 × 0.5 mm的棒状试样,陶瓷厚度8 × 3 mm (N = 100, N = 20/组)。每组只有一半的标本进行热循环(5-55°C/5000次)。对所有磁盘进行SBS测试,对棒材进行ST测试。计算了形状(m)和尺度(σ0)两参数威布尔分布值。结果:热循环仅对SLM组的SBS结果有显著影响(p = 0.017)。结论:测试方法和试样制作技术都会影响陶瓷与不同合金的结合强度。在大试样中,时效过程影响激光烧结组的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the ceramic adherence to alloys fabricated by different manufacturing techniques using two bond strength tests.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Schwickerath (ST) tests for the adherence of ceramic to cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated by different techniques, zirconia, and nickel chromium alloys.

Material and methods: Five different core/veneer combinations were prepared: Group SLM: selective laser melted Co-Cr; Group SM: soft milled Co-Cr; Group C: cast Co-Cr; Group Zi: soft milled zirconia; and Group Ni: cast nickel chromium, layered with ceramic. Disk-shaped specimens (diameter 15 mm, thickness 2 mm) with a ceramic thickness of 2 mm were prepared for SBS, and bars of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm with applied ceramic of 8 × 3 mm for ST (N = 100 and n = 20/group). Only half of the specimens from each group were thermocycled (5-55°C/5000 times). SBS test was applied to all the disks, and ST to the bars. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values, including shape (m) and scale (σ0), were calculated.

Results: Thermal cycling had only a significant effect on SBS results for the SLM group (p = 0.017). A significant difference was found between testing techniques and materials (p < 0.001). The lowest value was reported for SLM in the SBS method (p < 0.001). Failure types were mostly mixed in SBS and adhesive in ST. The highest Weibull parameters were obtained for group C.

Conclusion: Both the testing methodology and the specimens manufacturing technique influenced the bond strength of ceramic to different alloys. The aging process influenced the results in the laser-sintered group in large specimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信