支付意愿与儿童和成人疤痕的社会认知相关:众包研究。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Marina A Lentskevich, Alice Yau, Narainsai K Reddy, Sophia G Allison, Arun K Gosain
{"title":"支付意愿与儿童和成人疤痕的社会认知相关:众包研究。","authors":"Marina A Lentskevich, Alice Yau, Narainsai K Reddy, Sophia G Allison, Arun K Gosain","doi":"10.1177/22925503251355979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Willingness to pay (WTP) has been an important tool in healthcare used to understand public priorities and satisfaction rates. We utilized a crowdsourcing platform to assess WTP for pediatric versus adult scar \"removals.\" Our hypothesis is that scar visibility and scar bearer's age will affect respondents' WTP. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess social perception of pediatric and adult scars on faces and hands, and to assess effects of crowdsourcing survey's respondents' income, gender, and having own children on WTP. <b>Methods:</b> Images of pediatric and adult face and hand scars were obtained on Shutterstock. Two crowdsourcing Qualtrics surveys assessed WTP, scar severity rating from 1 to 5, and demographics of interest. <b>Results:</b> Face and hand scar surveys obtained 100 and 142 responses, respectively. Willingness to pay was higher for pediatric face scar \"removal\" than adult (USD$4946 vs $3130; <i>P</i> < .001) and pediatric hand scar \"removal\" than adult (USD$1418 vs $807; <i>P</i> < .001). Higher income was associated with higher WTP for face scars, but not hand scars. Gender did not influence WTP for child versus adult. Having children demonstrated higher WTP only for face scars in children. The severity of both face and hand pediatric scars was perceived to be worse than that of similar scars in adults. Per one point on the scar severity rating, respondents were willing to pay more for pediatric scar \"removal\" compared to that for adults. <b>Conclusions:</b> Willingness to pay is a useful tool for understanding the general population's priorities regarding scar revisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251355979"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to Pay Correlates With Social Perception of Pediatric and Adult Scars: Crowdsourcing Study.\",\"authors\":\"Marina A Lentskevich, Alice Yau, Narainsai K Reddy, Sophia G Allison, Arun K Gosain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22925503251355979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Willingness to pay (WTP) has been an important tool in healthcare used to understand public priorities and satisfaction rates. We utilized a crowdsourcing platform to assess WTP for pediatric versus adult scar \\\"removals.\\\" Our hypothesis is that scar visibility and scar bearer's age will affect respondents' WTP. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess social perception of pediatric and adult scars on faces and hands, and to assess effects of crowdsourcing survey's respondents' income, gender, and having own children on WTP. <b>Methods:</b> Images of pediatric and adult face and hand scars were obtained on Shutterstock. Two crowdsourcing Qualtrics surveys assessed WTP, scar severity rating from 1 to 5, and demographics of interest. <b>Results:</b> Face and hand scar surveys obtained 100 and 142 responses, respectively. Willingness to pay was higher for pediatric face scar \\\"removal\\\" than adult (USD$4946 vs $3130; <i>P</i> < .001) and pediatric hand scar \\\"removal\\\" than adult (USD$1418 vs $807; <i>P</i> < .001). Higher income was associated with higher WTP for face scars, but not hand scars. Gender did not influence WTP for child versus adult. Having children demonstrated higher WTP only for face scars in children. The severity of both face and hand pediatric scars was perceived to be worse than that of similar scars in adults. Per one point on the scar severity rating, respondents were willing to pay more for pediatric scar \\\"removal\\\" compared to that for adults. <b>Conclusions:</b> Willingness to pay is a useful tool for understanding the general population's priorities regarding scar revisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"22925503251355979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251355979\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251355979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支付意愿(WTP)一直是医疗保健中用于了解公众优先事项和满意度的重要工具。我们利用众包平台来评估儿童与成人疤痕“移除”的WTP。我们的假设是疤痕可见性和疤痕持有者的年龄会影响被调查者的WTP。目的:评估儿童和成人面部和手部疤痕的社会认知,并评估众包调查受访者的收入、性别和是否有自己的孩子对疤痕的影响。方法:在Shutterstock上获取儿童和成人面部及手部疤痕图像。两项众包质量调查评估了WTP,疤痕严重程度等级从1到5,以及感兴趣的人口统计数据。结果:面部和手部疤痕调查分别获得100和142份回复。儿童面部疤痕“去除”的支付意愿高于成人(4946美元对3130美元;结论:支付意愿是了解一般人群对疤痕修复优先级的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Willingness to Pay Correlates With Social Perception of Pediatric and Adult Scars: Crowdsourcing Study.

Background: Willingness to pay (WTP) has been an important tool in healthcare used to understand public priorities and satisfaction rates. We utilized a crowdsourcing platform to assess WTP for pediatric versus adult scar "removals." Our hypothesis is that scar visibility and scar bearer's age will affect respondents' WTP. Objectives: To assess social perception of pediatric and adult scars on faces and hands, and to assess effects of crowdsourcing survey's respondents' income, gender, and having own children on WTP. Methods: Images of pediatric and adult face and hand scars were obtained on Shutterstock. Two crowdsourcing Qualtrics surveys assessed WTP, scar severity rating from 1 to 5, and demographics of interest. Results: Face and hand scar surveys obtained 100 and 142 responses, respectively. Willingness to pay was higher for pediatric face scar "removal" than adult (USD$4946 vs $3130; P < .001) and pediatric hand scar "removal" than adult (USD$1418 vs $807; P < .001). Higher income was associated with higher WTP for face scars, but not hand scars. Gender did not influence WTP for child versus adult. Having children demonstrated higher WTP only for face scars in children. The severity of both face and hand pediatric scars was perceived to be worse than that of similar scars in adults. Per one point on the scar severity rating, respondents were willing to pay more for pediatric scar "removal" compared to that for adults. Conclusions: Willingness to pay is a useful tool for understanding the general population's priorities regarding scar revisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信