急诊科多发性硬化症:美国一个大型中心的回顾性病例对照研究

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Siddharth Satish, Amrapali Patel, Maya Latey Mastick, Seungwon Lee, Gladia C Hotan, Andrew Siyoon Ham, Farrah Jasmine Mateen
{"title":"急诊科多发性硬化症:美国一个大型中心的回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"Siddharth Satish, Amrapali Patel, Maya Latey Mastick, Seungwon Lee, Gladia C Hotan, Andrew Siyoon Ham, Farrah Jasmine Mateen","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The reasons for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to access emergency services are understudied in the era of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Many people with MS live with multiple comorbidities and/or experience social determinants of health, which may affect their emergency department (ED) use. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons and risk factors for ED visits among patients with known MS, including sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, and DMT efficacy category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Patients with MS were analyzed in a 1:2 ratio of cases (patients with at least one ED visit) and controls (no ED visits) during the study time frame June 2019-December 2023. Regression models were constructed to assess the association of predefined variables-sex, age, race, insurance type, comorbidities as a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and DMT efficacy category-with the likelihood of an ED visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,462 evaluated people with MS, 900 were randomly selected and included: 300 cases and 600 controls. Most patients were female (70.7% cases, 74.7% controls) and White (79.0% cases, 87.2% controls). Cases had a higher mean CCI score (0.83 points) compared with controls (0.05 points). Many people with MS were not taking a DMT (64.3% cases, 39.5% controls). ED utilization showed that 52.0% of patients had a single visit, with COVID-19 being the most common diagnosis (4.2%). 10.3% of people with MS who went to the ED had more than 5 visits during the study time frame. In a multivariable model, higher CCI score was the strongest predictor of ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 4.23, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No DMT use (OR = 2.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and having public or no insurance (OR = 1.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001) each increased the likelihood of an ED visit while identifying as a racial minority led to a lower likelihood of an ED visit (OR = 0.48, <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Specific risk factors for ED use occur in people with known MS. Comprehensive management of comorbidities and clinical pathways to reassess the high number of people with MS in the ED who do not take a DMT should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 5","pages":"e200445"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Sclerosis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in a Large US Center.\",\"authors\":\"Siddharth Satish, Amrapali Patel, Maya Latey Mastick, Seungwon Lee, Gladia C Hotan, Andrew Siyoon Ham, Farrah Jasmine Mateen\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The reasons for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to access emergency services are understudied in the era of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Many people with MS live with multiple comorbidities and/or experience social determinants of health, which may affect their emergency department (ED) use. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons and risk factors for ED visits among patients with known MS, including sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, and DMT efficacy category.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Patients with MS were analyzed in a 1:2 ratio of cases (patients with at least one ED visit) and controls (no ED visits) during the study time frame June 2019-December 2023. Regression models were constructed to assess the association of predefined variables-sex, age, race, insurance type, comorbidities as a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and DMT efficacy category-with the likelihood of an ED visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,462 evaluated people with MS, 900 were randomly selected and included: 300 cases and 600 controls. Most patients were female (70.7% cases, 74.7% controls) and White (79.0% cases, 87.2% controls). Cases had a higher mean CCI score (0.83 points) compared with controls (0.05 points). Many people with MS were not taking a DMT (64.3% cases, 39.5% controls). ED utilization showed that 52.0% of patients had a single visit, with COVID-19 being the most common diagnosis (4.2%). 10.3% of people with MS who went to the ED had more than 5 visits during the study time frame. In a multivariable model, higher CCI score was the strongest predictor of ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 4.23, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No DMT use (OR = 2.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and having public or no insurance (OR = 1.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001) each increased the likelihood of an ED visit while identifying as a racial minority led to a lower likelihood of an ED visit (OR = 0.48, <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Specific risk factors for ED use occur in people with known MS. Comprehensive management of comorbidities and clinical pathways to reassess the high number of people with MS in the ED who do not take a DMT should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"e200445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200445\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200445","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在高效疾病改善疗法(dmt)时代,多发性硬化症(MS)患者获得急诊服务的原因尚未得到充分研究。许多多发性硬化症患者患有多种合并症和/或经历健康的社会决定因素,这可能影响他们的急诊科(ED)使用。本研究的目的是确定已知多发性硬化症患者ED就诊的原因和危险因素,包括社会人口学特征、合并症负担和DMT疗效类别。方法:在波士顿麻省总医院进行回顾性病例对照研究。在2019年6月至2023年12月的研究时间框架内,以1:2的比例分析MS患者(至少有一次ED就诊的患者)和对照组(没有ED就诊的患者)。构建回归模型来评估预定义变量(性别、年龄、种族、保险类型、Charlson共病指数(CCI)中的合并症和DMT疗效类别)与急诊科就诊可能性的关联。结果:在1462名接受评估的多发性硬化症患者中,随机选择900人,包括300例病例和600例对照。以女性(70.7%,对照组74.7%)和白人(79.0%,对照组87.2%)居多。病例CCI平均评分(0.83分)高于对照组(0.05分)。许多多发性硬化症患者没有服用DMT(64.3%,对照组39.5%)。急诊科使用率显示,52.0%的患者单次就诊,其中COVID-19是最常见的诊断(4.2%)。10.3%的多发性硬化症患者在研究期间就诊超过5次。在多变量模型中,较高的CCI评分是ED就诊的最强预测因子(比值比[OR] = 4.23, p < 0.001)。不使用DMT (OR = 2.56, p < 0.001)和有公共保险或没有保险(OR = 1.99, p < 0.001)都增加了急诊科就诊的可能性,而确定为少数种族导致急诊科就诊的可能性较低(OR = 0.48, p = 0.006)。讨论:已知多发性硬化症患者使用ED的特定危险因素应考虑对合并症的综合管理和临床途径,以重新评估大量多发性硬化症患者不服用DMT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple Sclerosis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in a Large US Center.

Background and objectives: The reasons for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to access emergency services are understudied in the era of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Many people with MS live with multiple comorbidities and/or experience social determinants of health, which may affect their emergency department (ED) use. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons and risk factors for ED visits among patients with known MS, including sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, and DMT efficacy category.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Patients with MS were analyzed in a 1:2 ratio of cases (patients with at least one ED visit) and controls (no ED visits) during the study time frame June 2019-December 2023. Regression models were constructed to assess the association of predefined variables-sex, age, race, insurance type, comorbidities as a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and DMT efficacy category-with the likelihood of an ED visit.

Results: Of 1,462 evaluated people with MS, 900 were randomly selected and included: 300 cases and 600 controls. Most patients were female (70.7% cases, 74.7% controls) and White (79.0% cases, 87.2% controls). Cases had a higher mean CCI score (0.83 points) compared with controls (0.05 points). Many people with MS were not taking a DMT (64.3% cases, 39.5% controls). ED utilization showed that 52.0% of patients had a single visit, with COVID-19 being the most common diagnosis (4.2%). 10.3% of people with MS who went to the ED had more than 5 visits during the study time frame. In a multivariable model, higher CCI score was the strongest predictor of ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 4.23, p < 0.001). No DMT use (OR = 2.56, p < 0.001) and having public or no insurance (OR = 1.99, p < 0.001) each increased the likelihood of an ED visit while identifying as a racial minority led to a lower likelihood of an ED visit (OR = 0.48, p = 0.006).

Discussion: Specific risk factors for ED use occur in people with known MS. Comprehensive management of comorbidities and clinical pathways to reassess the high number of people with MS in the ED who do not take a DMT should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信