在注意缺陷/多动障碍的诊断评估中,使用抑郁和焦虑自述清单截止点筛选无效的精神症状夸大。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jason R Soble, John-Christopher A Finley, Matthew S Phillips, Steven A Abalos, Victor A Valencia, Kyle J Jennette, Neil H Pliskin
{"title":"在注意缺陷/多动障碍的诊断评估中,使用抑郁和焦虑自述清单截止点筛选无效的精神症状夸大。","authors":"Jason R Soble, John-Christopher A Finley, Matthew S Phillips, Steven A Abalos, Victor A Valencia, Kyle J Jennette, Neil H Pliskin","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study validated embedded symptom validity tests (SVT) in the Beck Depression (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety (BAI) Inventories that are sensitive to psychiatric symptom overreporting in an outpatient clinical population referred for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 623 consecutive neuropsychological referrals were analyzed. The sample comprised young-to-middle-aged community-dwelling adults, was predominantly female (61%), and 44% non-Hispanic white, 25% Hispanic, 16% non-Hispanic black, 10% Asian, and 5% other race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BDI-II ≥ 26 (33% to 86% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BAI ≥ 16 (38% to 82% sensitivity/90% specificity) were optimal cut-scores for detecting potential symptom overreporting. Scores exceeding the cutoffs on both the BDI-II and BAI SVTs should be counted as a single elevation, because these tests captured redundant aspects of overreporting. However, the BDI-II SVT was the stronger symptom overreporting indicator and should be prioritized as the more accurate test when BDI-II/BAI SVT discrepancies occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BDI-II and BAI embedded SVTs can detect possible symptom overreporting among diagnostically diverse outpatients undergoing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations. These SVTs are not intended to replace well-validated SVTs, but screen for symptom overreporting and identify patients who may require further assessment without incurring additional time, costs, or burden, as they are embedded in brief, routinely administered self-report measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 4","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Depression and Anxiety Self-report Inventory Cutoffs to Screen for Invalid Psychiatric Symptom Overreporting During Diagnostic Evaluations for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jason R Soble, John-Christopher A Finley, Matthew S Phillips, Steven A Abalos, Victor A Valencia, Kyle J Jennette, Neil H Pliskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study validated embedded symptom validity tests (SVT) in the Beck Depression (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety (BAI) Inventories that are sensitive to psychiatric symptom overreporting in an outpatient clinical population referred for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 623 consecutive neuropsychological referrals were analyzed. The sample comprised young-to-middle-aged community-dwelling adults, was predominantly female (61%), and 44% non-Hispanic white, 25% Hispanic, 16% non-Hispanic black, 10% Asian, and 5% other race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BDI-II ≥ 26 (33% to 86% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BAI ≥ 16 (38% to 82% sensitivity/90% specificity) were optimal cut-scores for detecting potential symptom overreporting. Scores exceeding the cutoffs on both the BDI-II and BAI SVTs should be counted as a single elevation, because these tests captured redundant aspects of overreporting. However, the BDI-II SVT was the stronger symptom overreporting indicator and should be prioritized as the more accurate test when BDI-II/BAI SVT discrepancies occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BDI-II and BAI embedded SVTs can detect possible symptom overreporting among diagnostically diverse outpatients undergoing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations. These SVTs are not intended to replace well-validated SVTs, but screen for symptom overreporting and identify patients who may require further assessment without incurring additional time, costs, or burden, as they are embedded in brief, routinely administered self-report measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"201-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000865\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究验证了贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)中嵌入症状效度测试(SVT)对精神症状夸大的敏感性,这些量表在门诊临床人群中用于注意缺陷/多动障碍诊断评估。方法:对623例连续神经心理学转诊患者的横断面资料进行分析。样本包括年轻到中年的社区居民,主要是女性(61%),44%的非西班牙裔白人,25%的西班牙裔,16%的非西班牙裔黑人,10%的亚洲人和5%的其他种族/民族。结果:BDI-II≥26(33% ~ 86%的敏感性/90%的特异性)和BAI≥16(38% ~ 82%的敏感性/90%的特异性)是检测潜在症状过报的最佳分值。在BDI-II和BAI svt上超过临界值的分数应该被计算为一次升高,因为这些测试捕获了过度报告的冗余方面。然而,BDI-II SVT是更强的症状夸大指标,当BDI-II/BAI SVT出现差异时,应优先考虑作为更准确的测试。结论:BDI-II和BAI嵌入的svt可以在接受注意缺陷/多动障碍评估的诊断不同的门诊患者中发现可能的症状夸大。这些svt并不打算取代经过良好验证的svt,而是筛查症状夸大,并确定可能需要进一步评估的患者,而不会产生额外的时间、成本或负担,因为它们包含在简短的常规管理的自我报告测量中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Depression and Anxiety Self-report Inventory Cutoffs to Screen for Invalid Psychiatric Symptom Overreporting During Diagnostic Evaluations for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: This study validated embedded symptom validity tests (SVT) in the Beck Depression (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety (BAI) Inventories that are sensitive to psychiatric symptom overreporting in an outpatient clinical population referred for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic evaluation.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from 623 consecutive neuropsychological referrals were analyzed. The sample comprised young-to-middle-aged community-dwelling adults, was predominantly female (61%), and 44% non-Hispanic white, 25% Hispanic, 16% non-Hispanic black, 10% Asian, and 5% other race/ethnicity.

Results: BDI-II ≥ 26 (33% to 86% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BAI ≥ 16 (38% to 82% sensitivity/90% specificity) were optimal cut-scores for detecting potential symptom overreporting. Scores exceeding the cutoffs on both the BDI-II and BAI SVTs should be counted as a single elevation, because these tests captured redundant aspects of overreporting. However, the BDI-II SVT was the stronger symptom overreporting indicator and should be prioritized as the more accurate test when BDI-II/BAI SVT discrepancies occur.

Conclusions: BDI-II and BAI embedded SVTs can detect possible symptom overreporting among diagnostically diverse outpatients undergoing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations. These SVTs are not intended to replace well-validated SVTs, but screen for symptom overreporting and identify patients who may require further assessment without incurring additional time, costs, or burden, as they are embedded in brief, routinely administered self-report measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信