轻度创伤性脑损伤后客观与主观认知状态:心理因素的作用。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gabrielle A Hromas, Marlina A Novoa, Jeremy J Davis
{"title":"轻度创伤性脑损伤后客观与主观认知状态:心理因素的作用。","authors":"Gabrielle A Hromas, Marlina A Novoa, Jeremy J Davis","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between objective cognitive performance and self-reported cognitive status after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whether mental health symptoms influence this relationship.</p><p><strong>Participants and design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System database included an initial sample of 2657 participants. Cases with missing data, questionable validity, age over 65, or mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI were excluded resulting in a final sample of 614 individuals (n = 138 controls and n = 476 mTBI).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Z-scores were derived using the Brief Test of Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) cognitive screener and the composite of the cognitive complaint items (CC) on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire to represent objective and subjective cognitive status, respectively. The cognitive discrepancy was calculated by regressing BTACT on CC scores and retaining standardized residuals which produced a different score. A linear regression model was fitted using continuous cognitive discrepancy scores as the outcome and age, gender, time since injury, education, and mental health status (obtained via several self-report questionnaires) as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with mTBI had higher affective symptoms and cognitive complaints but did not differ from controls based on objective cognitive abilities. Affective symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with mTBI who reported higher subjective complaints than expected based on cognitive scores. Older age, female gender, and increased emotional distress were associated with greater cognitive discrepancy in the whole sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with prior research, elevated psychological symptoms burden was associated with higher subjective cognitive complaints in relation to objective cognitive abilities. These results highlight the continued need for psychological intervention in post-mTBI recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective Versus Subjective Cognitive Status Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Psychological Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle A Hromas, Marlina A Novoa, Jeremy J Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between objective cognitive performance and self-reported cognitive status after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whether mental health symptoms influence this relationship.</p><p><strong>Participants and design: </strong>Secondary analysis of the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System database included an initial sample of 2657 participants. Cases with missing data, questionable validity, age over 65, or mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI were excluded resulting in a final sample of 614 individuals (n = 138 controls and n = 476 mTBI).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Z-scores were derived using the Brief Test of Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) cognitive screener and the composite of the cognitive complaint items (CC) on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire to represent objective and subjective cognitive status, respectively. The cognitive discrepancy was calculated by regressing BTACT on CC scores and retaining standardized residuals which produced a different score. A linear regression model was fitted using continuous cognitive discrepancy scores as the outcome and age, gender, time since injury, education, and mental health status (obtained via several self-report questionnaires) as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with mTBI had higher affective symptoms and cognitive complaints but did not differ from controls based on objective cognitive abilities. Affective symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with mTBI who reported higher subjective complaints than expected based on cognitive scores. Older age, female gender, and increased emotional distress were associated with greater cognitive discrepancy in the whole sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with prior research, elevated psychological symptoms burden was associated with higher subjective cognitive complaints in relation to objective cognitive abilities. These results highlight the continued need for psychological intervention in post-mTBI recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后客观认知表现与自我报告认知状态之间的关系,以及心理健康症状是否影响这种关系。参与者和设计:联邦机构间创伤性脑损伤研究信息系统数据库的二次分析包括2657名参与者的初始样本。排除了数据缺失、有效性可疑、年龄超过65岁或轻度、中度或重度TBI的病例,最终样本为614人(n = 138对照和n = 476 mTBI)。主要测量方法:采用电话认知简短测验(BTACT)认知筛选器和Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的认知抱怨项目(CC)组合得出z分数,分别代表客观和主观认知状况。认知差异是通过对CC分数回归BTACT和保留产生不同分数的标准化残差来计算的。采用连续认知差异评分作为结果,以年龄、性别、受伤时间、教育程度和心理健康状况(通过几份自我报告问卷获得)作为预测因子,拟合线性回归模型。结果:mTBI患者有更高的情感症状和认知主诉,但在客观认知能力方面与对照组没有差异。情绪性症状在mTBI患者中显着更高,他们报告的主观抱怨高于基于认知评分的预期。在整个样本中,年龄较大、女性和情绪困扰增加与更大的认知差异有关。结论:与既往研究一致,心理症状负担加重与客观认知能力相关的主观认知主诉较高相关。这些结果强调了在mtbi后恢复中继续需要心理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objective Versus Subjective Cognitive Status Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Psychological Factors.

Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between objective cognitive performance and self-reported cognitive status after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whether mental health symptoms influence this relationship.

Participants and design: Secondary analysis of the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System database included an initial sample of 2657 participants. Cases with missing data, questionable validity, age over 65, or mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI were excluded resulting in a final sample of 614 individuals (n = 138 controls and n = 476 mTBI).

Main measures: Z-scores were derived using the Brief Test of Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) cognitive screener and the composite of the cognitive complaint items (CC) on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire to represent objective and subjective cognitive status, respectively. The cognitive discrepancy was calculated by regressing BTACT on CC scores and retaining standardized residuals which produced a different score. A linear regression model was fitted using continuous cognitive discrepancy scores as the outcome and age, gender, time since injury, education, and mental health status (obtained via several self-report questionnaires) as predictors.

Results: Individuals with mTBI had higher affective symptoms and cognitive complaints but did not differ from controls based on objective cognitive abilities. Affective symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with mTBI who reported higher subjective complaints than expected based on cognitive scores. Older age, female gender, and increased emotional distress were associated with greater cognitive discrepancy in the whole sample.

Conclusions: Consistent with prior research, elevated psychological symptoms burden was associated with higher subjective cognitive complaints in relation to objective cognitive abilities. These results highlight the continued need for psychological intervention in post-mTBI recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信