基于深度学习的高分辨率ct对≤2 cm胰腺导管腺癌的自动检测:肿瘤肿块检测与间接指标评价相结合的影响

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Susumu Hijioka, Hidenobu Hara, Yusuke Wakatsuki, Toshihiro Ishihara, Chihiro Hattori, Ryo Hirano, Shintaro Ambo, Minoru Esaki, Masahiko Kusumoto, Yoshiyuki Matsui
{"title":"基于深度学习的高分辨率ct对≤2 cm胰腺导管腺癌的自动检测:肿瘤肿块检测与间接指标评价相结合的影响","authors":"Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Susumu Hijioka, Hidenobu Hara, Yusuke Wakatsuki, Toshihiro Ishihara, Chihiro Hattori, Ryo Hirano, Shintaro Ambo, Minoru Esaki, Masahiko Kusumoto, Yoshiyuki Matsui","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01836-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Detecting small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) is challenging owing to their difficulty in being identified as distinct tumor masses. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for the automatic detection of small PDAC using both automatic tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>High-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans from 181 patients diagnosed with PDAC (diameter ≤ 2 cm) between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. The D/P ratio, which is the cross-sectional area of the MPD to that of the pancreatic parenchyma, was identified as an indirect indicator. A total of 204 patient data sets including 104 normal controls were analyzed for automatic tumor mass detection and D/P ratio evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated to detect tumor mass. The sensitivity of PDAC detection was compared with that of the software and radiologists, and tumor localization accuracy was validated against endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for tumor mass detection were 77.0%, 76.0%, 75.5%, and 77.5%, respectively; for D/P ratio detection, 87.0%, 94.2%, 93.5%, and 88.3%, respectively; and for combined tumor mass and D/P ratio detections, 96.0%, 70.2%, 75.6%, and 94.8%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the software's sensitivity and that of the radiologist's report (software, 96.0%; radiologist, 96.0%; p = 1). The concordance rate between software findings and EUS was 96.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining indirect indicator evaluation with tumor mass detection may improve small PDAC detection accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm with high-resolution computed tomography: impact of the combination of tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Susumu Hijioka, Hidenobu Hara, Yusuke Wakatsuki, Toshihiro Ishihara, Chihiro Hattori, Ryo Hirano, Shintaro Ambo, Minoru Esaki, Masahiko Kusumoto, Yoshiyuki Matsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01836-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Detecting small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) is challenging owing to their difficulty in being identified as distinct tumor masses. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for the automatic detection of small PDAC using both automatic tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>High-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans from 181 patients diagnosed with PDAC (diameter ≤ 2 cm) between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. The D/P ratio, which is the cross-sectional area of the MPD to that of the pancreatic parenchyma, was identified as an indirect indicator. A total of 204 patient data sets including 104 normal controls were analyzed for automatic tumor mass detection and D/P ratio evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated to detect tumor mass. The sensitivity of PDAC detection was compared with that of the software and radiologists, and tumor localization accuracy was validated against endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for tumor mass detection were 77.0%, 76.0%, 75.5%, and 77.5%, respectively; for D/P ratio detection, 87.0%, 94.2%, 93.5%, and 88.3%, respectively; and for combined tumor mass and D/P ratio detections, 96.0%, 70.2%, 75.6%, and 94.8%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the software's sensitivity and that of the radiologist's report (software, 96.0%; radiologist, 96.0%; p = 1). The concordance rate between software findings and EUS was 96.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining indirect indicator evaluation with tumor mass detection may improve small PDAC detection accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01836-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01836-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的检测是具有挑战性的,因为它们很难被识别为不同的肿瘤肿块。本研究通过自动肿瘤质量检测和间接指标评估来评估三维卷积神经网络对小型PDAC自动检测的诊断性能。材料与方法:分析2018年1月至2023年12月诊断为PDAC(直径≤2 cm)的181例患者的高分辨率对比度增强计算机断层扫描(CT)。D/P比率,即MPD与胰腺实质的横截面积,被认为是一个间接指标。共分析204例患者数据集,其中包括104例正常对照,用于自动肿瘤肿块检测和D/P比值评估。评估其检测肿瘤肿块的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。将PDAC检测的灵敏度与软件和放射科医生的检测结果进行比较,并根据超声内镜(EUS)检查结果验证肿瘤定位的准确性。结果:肿瘤肿块检测的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV分别为77.0%、76.0%、75.5%、77.5%;D/P比检测分别为87.0%、94.2%、93.5%、88.3%;肿瘤质量和D/P比值联合检测,分别为96.0%、70.2%、75.6%和94.8%。软件的敏感性与放射科医生报告的敏感性无显著差异(软件,96.0%;放射科医生,96.0%;p = 1)。软件结果与EUS的符合率为96.0%。结论:将间接指标评价与肿瘤肿块检测相结合,可提高小PDAC的检测准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning-based automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm with high-resolution computed tomography: impact of the combination of tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.

Purpose: Detecting small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) is challenging owing to their difficulty in being identified as distinct tumor masses. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for the automatic detection of small PDAC using both automatic tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.

Materials and methods: High-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans from 181 patients diagnosed with PDAC (diameter ≤ 2 cm) between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. The D/P ratio, which is the cross-sectional area of the MPD to that of the pancreatic parenchyma, was identified as an indirect indicator. A total of 204 patient data sets including 104 normal controls were analyzed for automatic tumor mass detection and D/P ratio evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated to detect tumor mass. The sensitivity of PDAC detection was compared with that of the software and radiologists, and tumor localization accuracy was validated against endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for tumor mass detection were 77.0%, 76.0%, 75.5%, and 77.5%, respectively; for D/P ratio detection, 87.0%, 94.2%, 93.5%, and 88.3%, respectively; and for combined tumor mass and D/P ratio detections, 96.0%, 70.2%, 75.6%, and 94.8%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the software's sensitivity and that of the radiologist's report (software, 96.0%; radiologist, 96.0%; p = 1). The concordance rate between software findings and EUS was 96.0%.

Conclusions: Combining indirect indicator evaluation with tumor mass detection may improve small PDAC detection accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信