使用定时Up和Go测试测量骨盆环损伤后非老年患者的活动能力。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Simon Tiziani, Julian Scherer, Patrick Saurenmann, Sasha Halvachizadeh, Roman Pfeifer, Kai Sprengel, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff
{"title":"使用定时Up和Go测试测量骨盆环损伤后非老年患者的活动能力。","authors":"Simon Tiziani, Julian Scherer, Patrick Saurenmann, Sasha Halvachizadeh, Roman Pfeifer, Kai Sprengel, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic ring injuries are rare injuries that frequently are associated with prolonged recovery and low return-to-work rates. Since radiological outcome not always correlates with overall patient-reported outcome, the assessement of functional outcome has become a focus of follow up. The Timed-Up and Go test (TUG) would be a simple way to quantify patient mobility, but has not yet been adequately validated in a non-geriatric patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients younger than 70 years who underwent functional outcome testing as routine follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, or 6 months after pelvic ring injuries between 11/2017 and 10/2018 were included in this study. In addition to a TUG test, all patients completed a specific functional outcome score for pelvic ring injuries (Majeed-Score) and a general health score (Eq. 5D-3 L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (mean age 40 years, range 18 to 68 years, 24 female), ) of which 28 were treated operatively were included in the study. The mean Majeed-Score was 75.0 (SD 23.3, range 20 to 100) and the mean Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS was 69.9 (SD 22.5, range 5 to 100). The mean time for TUG was 7.8 s. (SD 4.1, range 2 to 22.). TUG time strongly correlated with the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001) and with the mobility portion of the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.524, p = 0.001). For a threshold value of 10 s in the TUG test, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82% in predicting an impaired Majeed score of below 60 (AUC 0.935).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TUG correlated strongly with the Majeed score and the mobility part of the Majeed-Score indicating that achieved values reflect the subjective accounts provided by patients. The TUG can be used as a quick screening in non-geriatric patients with pelvic ring injuries to quantify mobility. A TUG longer than 10 s indicates an impaired Majeed score. For academic purposes, however, it should be accompanied by the Majeed-Score.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Timed Up and Go test to measure mobility in non-geriatric patients after pelvic ring injury.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Tiziani, Julian Scherer, Patrick Saurenmann, Sasha Halvachizadeh, Roman Pfeifer, Kai Sprengel, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic ring injuries are rare injuries that frequently are associated with prolonged recovery and low return-to-work rates. Since radiological outcome not always correlates with overall patient-reported outcome, the assessement of functional outcome has become a focus of follow up. The Timed-Up and Go test (TUG) would be a simple way to quantify patient mobility, but has not yet been adequately validated in a non-geriatric patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients younger than 70 years who underwent functional outcome testing as routine follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, or 6 months after pelvic ring injuries between 11/2017 and 10/2018 were included in this study. In addition to a TUG test, all patients completed a specific functional outcome score for pelvic ring injuries (Majeed-Score) and a general health score (Eq. 5D-3 L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (mean age 40 years, range 18 to 68 years, 24 female), ) of which 28 were treated operatively were included in the study. The mean Majeed-Score was 75.0 (SD 23.3, range 20 to 100) and the mean Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS was 69.9 (SD 22.5, range 5 to 100). The mean time for TUG was 7.8 s. (SD 4.1, range 2 to 22.). TUG time strongly correlated with the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001) and with the mobility portion of the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.524, p = 0.001). For a threshold value of 10 s in the TUG test, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82% in predicting an impaired Majeed score of below 60 (AUC 0.935).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TUG correlated strongly with the Majeed score and the mobility part of the Majeed-Score indicating that achieved values reflect the subjective accounts provided by patients. The TUG can be used as a quick screening in non-geriatric patients with pelvic ring injuries to quantify mobility. A TUG longer than 10 s indicates an impaired Majeed score. For academic purposes, however, it should be accompanied by the Majeed-Score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盆腔环损伤是一种罕见的损伤,通常与长期恢复和低复工率有关。由于放射学结果并不总是与患者报告的总体结果相关,因此功能结果的评估已成为随访的重点。time - up and Go测试(TUG)将是一种量化患者活动能力的简单方法,但尚未在非老年患者人群中得到充分验证。方法:在2017年11月至2018年10月期间,年龄小于70岁的连续患者在骨盆环损伤后6周、12周或6个月接受功能结局测试作为常规随访。除了TUG测试外,所有患者还完成了骨盆环损伤的特定功能结局评分(Majeed-Score)和一般健康评分(Eq. 5d - 3l)。结果:共纳入40例患者(平均年龄40岁,18 ~ 68岁,女性24例),其中手术治疗28例。平均Majeed-Score为75.0 (SD 23.3,范围20 ~ 100),平均Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS为69.9 (SD 22.5,范围5 ~ 100)。TUG的平均时间为7.8 s (SD 4.1,范围2 ~ 22)。TUG时间与Majeed-Score呈正相关(r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001),与Majeed-Score的流动性部分呈正相关(r= - 0.524, p = 0.001)。对于TUG测试的阈值为10 s, ROC分析显示,在预测低于60的Majeed评分时,灵敏度为91%,特异性为82% (AUC 0.935)。结论:TUG与Majeed评分及Majeed评分的可动性部分有较强的相关性,表明得分反映了患者的主观描述。TUG可作为非老年骨盆环损伤患者的快速筛查来量化活动度。超过10秒的TUG表示马吉德评分受损。然而,出于学术目的,它应该伴随着Majeed-Score。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using the Timed Up and Go test to measure mobility in non-geriatric patients after pelvic ring injury.

Using the Timed Up and Go test to measure mobility in non-geriatric patients after pelvic ring injury.

Using the Timed Up and Go test to measure mobility in non-geriatric patients after pelvic ring injury.

Introduction: Pelvic ring injuries are rare injuries that frequently are associated with prolonged recovery and low return-to-work rates. Since radiological outcome not always correlates with overall patient-reported outcome, the assessement of functional outcome has become a focus of follow up. The Timed-Up and Go test (TUG) would be a simple way to quantify patient mobility, but has not yet been adequately validated in a non-geriatric patient population.

Methods: Consecutive patients younger than 70 years who underwent functional outcome testing as routine follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, or 6 months after pelvic ring injuries between 11/2017 and 10/2018 were included in this study. In addition to a TUG test, all patients completed a specific functional outcome score for pelvic ring injuries (Majeed-Score) and a general health score (Eq. 5D-3 L).

Results: Forty patients (mean age 40 years, range 18 to 68 years, 24 female), ) of which 28 were treated operatively were included in the study. The mean Majeed-Score was 75.0 (SD 23.3, range 20 to 100) and the mean Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS was 69.9 (SD 22.5, range 5 to 100). The mean time for TUG was 7.8 s. (SD 4.1, range 2 to 22.). TUG time strongly correlated with the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001) and with the mobility portion of the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.524, p = 0.001). For a threshold value of 10 s in the TUG test, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82% in predicting an impaired Majeed score of below 60 (AUC 0.935).

Conclusion: The TUG correlated strongly with the Majeed score and the mobility part of the Majeed-Score indicating that achieved values reflect the subjective accounts provided by patients. The TUG can be used as a quick screening in non-geriatric patients with pelvic ring injuries to quantify mobility. A TUG longer than 10 s indicates an impaired Majeed score. For academic purposes, however, it should be accompanied by the Majeed-Score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信