髓内钉与外环固定治疗胫骨干骨折:IMVEX试验中肌肉力量的探索性分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Peter Larsen, Rasmus Stokholm, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten Kjerri Rasmussen, Steffen Skov Jensen, Rasmus Elsoe
{"title":"髓内钉与外环固定治疗胫骨干骨折:IMVEX试验中肌肉力量的探索性分析。","authors":"Peter Larsen, Rasmus Stokholm, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten Kjerri Rasmussen, Steffen Skov Jensen, Rasmus Elsoe","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the effect of intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures on 12-month maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. We hypothesise that patients treated with external ring fixation will show significantly better maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion 12 months after surgery compared to treatment with intramedullary nailing. Moreover, we aim to explore the association between muscle strength and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 12 months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic multicentre randomised, non-blinded trial with a two-group parallel design. This study is an explorative analysis of the IntraMedullary nailing Versus EXternal ring fixation Trial (IMVEX). 67 patients with a tibial shaft fracture were randomized to external ring fixation or intramedullary nailing. The primary outcome: maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. Secondary outcome was KOOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation was observed (P < 0.31). Examination of maximal isometric muscle strength showed significant difference between the injured and the non-injured leg (knee extension: mean difference of 53N, (95%CI 33.9-72.4), knee flexion: mean difference of 35N, (95%CI 21.2-47.9)) The association between KOOS subscale scores and the relative difference in muscle strength for knee extension showed significant and moderate to high correlation (0.4-0.8) for all subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Muscle strength of knee flexion and extension was markedly decreased one year after fracture. We observed no statistically significant difference in recovery of muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation. Results indicate that a decrease in muscle strength is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for all five KOOS subscales.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03945669.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for tibial shaft fractures: an explorative analysis of muscle strength from the IMVEX trial.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Larsen, Rasmus Stokholm, Jan Duedal Rölfing, Juozas Petruskevicius, Morten Kjerri Rasmussen, Steffen Skov Jensen, Rasmus Elsoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the effect of intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures on 12-month maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. We hypothesise that patients treated with external ring fixation will show significantly better maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion 12 months after surgery compared to treatment with intramedullary nailing. Moreover, we aim to explore the association between muscle strength and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 12 months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic multicentre randomised, non-blinded trial with a two-group parallel design. This study is an explorative analysis of the IntraMedullary nailing Versus EXternal ring fixation Trial (IMVEX). 67 patients with a tibial shaft fracture were randomized to external ring fixation or intramedullary nailing. The primary outcome: maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. Secondary outcome was KOOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation was observed (P < 0.31). Examination of maximal isometric muscle strength showed significant difference between the injured and the non-injured leg (knee extension: mean difference of 53N, (95%CI 33.9-72.4), knee flexion: mean difference of 35N, (95%CI 21.2-47.9)) The association between KOOS subscale scores and the relative difference in muscle strength for knee extension showed significant and moderate to high correlation (0.4-0.8) for all subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Muscle strength of knee flexion and extension was markedly decreased one year after fracture. We observed no statistically significant difference in recovery of muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation. Results indicate that a decrease in muscle strength is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for all five KOOS subscales.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03945669.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨髓内钉与外环固定对胫骨干骨折患者12个月膝关节屈伸最大等长肌力的影响。我们假设,与髓内钉治疗相比,接受外环固定治疗的患者在术后12个月的膝关节伸展和膝关节屈曲时表现出明显更好的最大等长肌力。此外,我们的目的是探讨术后12个月肌肉力量与膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(oos)之间的关系。方法:一项实用的多中心随机、非盲法试验,采用两组平行设计。本研究是对髓内钉与外环固定试验(IMVEX)的探索性分析。67例胫骨干骨折患者随机接受外环固定或髓内钉治疗。主要结果:膝关节伸展和屈曲的最大等长肌力。次要终点为KOOS。结果:髓内钉治疗与外环固定治疗的肌力差异无统计学意义(P)结论:骨折后1年屈伸膝关节肌力明显下降。我们观察到髓内钉治疗和外环固定治疗在肌力恢复方面无统计学差异。结果表明,在所有五个oos亚量表中,肌肉力量的下降与患者报告的较差结果相关。试验注册:NCT03945669。证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for tibial shaft fractures: an explorative analysis of muscle strength from the IMVEX trial.

Background: To explore the effect of intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures on 12-month maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. We hypothesise that patients treated with external ring fixation will show significantly better maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion 12 months after surgery compared to treatment with intramedullary nailing. Moreover, we aim to explore the association between muscle strength and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 12 months following surgery.

Methods: A pragmatic multicentre randomised, non-blinded trial with a two-group parallel design. This study is an explorative analysis of the IntraMedullary nailing Versus EXternal ring fixation Trial (IMVEX). 67 patients with a tibial shaft fracture were randomized to external ring fixation or intramedullary nailing. The primary outcome: maximal isometric muscle strength for knee extension and knee flexion. Secondary outcome was KOOS.

Results: No statistically significant difference in muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation was observed (P < 0.31). Examination of maximal isometric muscle strength showed significant difference between the injured and the non-injured leg (knee extension: mean difference of 53N, (95%CI 33.9-72.4), knee flexion: mean difference of 35N, (95%CI 21.2-47.9)) The association between KOOS subscale scores and the relative difference in muscle strength for knee extension showed significant and moderate to high correlation (0.4-0.8) for all subscales.

Conclusion: Muscle strength of knee flexion and extension was markedly decreased one year after fracture. We observed no statistically significant difference in recovery of muscle strength between treatment with intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation. Results indicate that a decrease in muscle strength is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for all five KOOS subscales.

Trial registration: NCT03945669.

Level of evidence: II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信