胰腺癌多学科小组会议的数据效用、临床影响和成本的范围综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Que Wuttivat Sabmeethavorn, Amy Sylivris, Rachael Mackie, Geertje Noë, Julie Chu, Belinda Lee, Benjamin Paul Timothy Loveday
{"title":"胰腺癌多学科小组会议的数据效用、临床影响和成本的范围综述。","authors":"Que Wuttivat Sabmeethavorn, Amy Sylivris, Rachael Mackie, Geertje Noë, Julie Chu, Belinda Lee, Benjamin Paul Timothy Loveday","doi":"10.1111/ans.70262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDMs) are the accepted model for constructing treatment plans for pancreatic cancer (PC). With increasing PC diagnoses and budget constraints, MDMs must undertake cost-effective workflows. We aimed to summarize available evidence on the utility of information collected, their impact on care decisions, and cost burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until December 2023. Included studies related to adult PCMDMs, their impact on diagnosis, treatment plans, and costs. Data were deductively and inductively analyzed based on study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exactly 36 studies were included from 3728 identified studies. Information influencing MDM decisions were patient age, alcohol use, comorbidities, CEA/CA19-9, and CT imaging, with structured referral forms reported to improve data collection. PCMDMs changed initial diagnosis in 3.4%-21.7%, resectability assessment in 18.7%-29.7%, and treatment plan in 18.2%-72.2% of patients. PCMDMs increased participation in clinical trials/cancer registries. PCMDMs accrued substantial time (16.5 h weekly preparation per MDM) and financial cost ($240 USD/case).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCMDM best practice should include standardization of collected data, identifying patients for clinical trials/registries, and knowledge of emerging technologies. Further research on PCMDM cost-burden is required to improve its cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on the Data Utility, Clinical Impact, and Cost of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Pancreatic Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Que Wuttivat Sabmeethavorn, Amy Sylivris, Rachael Mackie, Geertje Noë, Julie Chu, Belinda Lee, Benjamin Paul Timothy Loveday\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.70262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDMs) are the accepted model for constructing treatment plans for pancreatic cancer (PC). With increasing PC diagnoses and budget constraints, MDMs must undertake cost-effective workflows. We aimed to summarize available evidence on the utility of information collected, their impact on care decisions, and cost burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until December 2023. Included studies related to adult PCMDMs, their impact on diagnosis, treatment plans, and costs. Data were deductively and inductively analyzed based on study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exactly 36 studies were included from 3728 identified studies. Information influencing MDM decisions were patient age, alcohol use, comorbidities, CEA/CA19-9, and CT imaging, with structured referral forms reported to improve data collection. PCMDMs changed initial diagnosis in 3.4%-21.7%, resectability assessment in 18.7%-29.7%, and treatment plan in 18.2%-72.2% of patients. PCMDMs increased participation in clinical trials/cancer registries. PCMDMs accrued substantial time (16.5 h weekly preparation per MDM) and financial cost ($240 USD/case).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCMDM best practice should include standardization of collected data, identifying patients for clinical trials/registries, and knowledge of emerging technologies. Further research on PCMDM cost-burden is required to improve its cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70262\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多学科小组会议(MDMs)是制定胰腺癌治疗计划的公认模式。随着PC诊断和预算限制的增加,mdm必须承担成本效益高的工作流程。我们的目的是总结现有证据收集的信息的效用,他们对护理决策的影响,和成本负担。方法:对MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库进行系统的范围综述,检索截止日期为2023年12月。包括与成人PCMDMs相关的研究,它们对诊断、治疗计划和费用的影响。根据研究目的对数据进行演绎和归纳分析。结果:从3728项确定的研究中纳入了36项研究。影响MDM决策的信息包括患者年龄、酒精使用、合并症、CEA/CA19-9和CT成像,结构化的转诊表格有助于改善数据收集。PCMDMs改变初始诊断的比例为3.4% ~ 21.7%,改变可切除性评估的比例为18.7% ~ 29.7%,改变治疗方案的比例为18.2% ~ 72.2%。PCMDMs增加了临床试验/癌症登记的参与。pcmdm累积了大量的时间(每个MDM每周准备16.5小时)和财务成本(每箱240美元)。结论:PCMDM最佳实践应包括收集数据的标准化,确定临床试验/注册的患者,以及对新兴技术的了解。为了提高PCMDM的成本效益,需要进一步研究PCMDM的成本负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Scoping Review on the Data Utility, Clinical Impact, and Cost of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Pancreatic Cancer.

Background: Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDMs) are the accepted model for constructing treatment plans for pancreatic cancer (PC). With increasing PC diagnoses and budget constraints, MDMs must undertake cost-effective workflows. We aimed to summarize available evidence on the utility of information collected, their impact on care decisions, and cost burden.

Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until December 2023. Included studies related to adult PCMDMs, their impact on diagnosis, treatment plans, and costs. Data were deductively and inductively analyzed based on study aims.

Results: Exactly 36 studies were included from 3728 identified studies. Information influencing MDM decisions were patient age, alcohol use, comorbidities, CEA/CA19-9, and CT imaging, with structured referral forms reported to improve data collection. PCMDMs changed initial diagnosis in 3.4%-21.7%, resectability assessment in 18.7%-29.7%, and treatment plan in 18.2%-72.2% of patients. PCMDMs increased participation in clinical trials/cancer registries. PCMDMs accrued substantial time (16.5 h weekly preparation per MDM) and financial cost ($240 USD/case).

Conclusion: PCMDM best practice should include standardization of collected data, identifying patients for clinical trials/registries, and knowledge of emerging technologies. Further research on PCMDM cost-burden is required to improve its cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信