妊娠期糖尿病患者的最佳分娩时机。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rebecca Fleenor, Victoria C Jauk, Macie Champion, Ashley N Battarbee
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病患者的最佳分娩时机。","authors":"Rebecca Fleenor, Victoria C Jauk, Macie Champion, Ashley N Battarbee","doi":"10.1055/a-2657-6130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SMFM and ACOG recommend delivery of gravidae with pregestational diabetes at 36-39 6/7 weeks based on glycemic control and vascular complications. The optimal gestational age within this wide range is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of adverse outcomes with delivery versus expectant management at increasing gestational ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of gravidae with pregestational diabetes who delivered a non-anomalous singleton at 36 weeks (2012-2022). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included composite components, composite severe neonatal morbidity, LGA, SGA, NICU admission and cesarean. Poisson regression with robust error variance estimated the association between delivery at 36, 37, and 38 weeks and outcomes, compared with expectant management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>843 gravidae met inclusion criteria: 235 (28%) type 1 diabetes and 602 (71%) type 2 diabetes. Overall, 146 (17%) delivered at 36 weeks, 283 (34%) at 37 weeks, 217 (26%) at 38 weeks, and 197 (23%) at 39 weeks. Compared with expectant management, delivery at 36 weeks was associated with higher odds of composite morbidity (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55) as well as hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, SGA and NICU admission. At 37 and 38 weeks, there was no significant difference in composite morbidity among those delivered versus expectantly managed. However, delivery at 37 weeks was associated with higher odds of hyperbilirubinemia, compared with expectant management. No other outcomes differed between with delivery versus expectant management at 37 or 38 weeks. Few associations differed by diabetes type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results and supporting literature, elective delivery at 36 weeks should be avoided unless necessary. Although the data are inconclusive regarding delivery at 37 weeks, delivery at 38 weeks should be evaluated further for gravidae with pregestational diabetes. Confirmation in a large, contemporary cohort or a randomized trial are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing of delivery in pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Fleenor, Victoria C Jauk, Macie Champion, Ashley N Battarbee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2657-6130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SMFM and ACOG recommend delivery of gravidae with pregestational diabetes at 36-39 6/7 weeks based on glycemic control and vascular complications. The optimal gestational age within this wide range is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of adverse outcomes with delivery versus expectant management at increasing gestational ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of gravidae with pregestational diabetes who delivered a non-anomalous singleton at 36 weeks (2012-2022). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included composite components, composite severe neonatal morbidity, LGA, SGA, NICU admission and cesarean. Poisson regression with robust error variance estimated the association between delivery at 36, 37, and 38 weeks and outcomes, compared with expectant management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>843 gravidae met inclusion criteria: 235 (28%) type 1 diabetes and 602 (71%) type 2 diabetes. Overall, 146 (17%) delivered at 36 weeks, 283 (34%) at 37 weeks, 217 (26%) at 38 weeks, and 197 (23%) at 39 weeks. Compared with expectant management, delivery at 36 weeks was associated with higher odds of composite morbidity (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55) as well as hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, SGA and NICU admission. At 37 and 38 weeks, there was no significant difference in composite morbidity among those delivered versus expectantly managed. However, delivery at 37 weeks was associated with higher odds of hyperbilirubinemia, compared with expectant management. No other outcomes differed between with delivery versus expectant management at 37 or 38 weeks. Few associations differed by diabetes type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results and supporting literature, elective delivery at 36 weeks should be avoided unless necessary. Although the data are inconclusive regarding delivery at 37 weeks, delivery at 38 weeks should be evaluated further for gravidae with pregestational diabetes. Confirmation in a large, contemporary cohort or a randomized trial are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2657-6130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2657-6130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:基于血糖控制和血管并发症,SMFM和ACOG推荐妊娠糖尿病孕妇在36-39 6/7周分娩。在这个大范围内的最佳胎龄是未知的。我们的目的是评估在增加胎龄的情况下,分娩与预期治疗的不良后果风险。方法:回顾性队列研究妊娠期糖尿病患者在妊娠36周(2012-2022)分娩一名非异常单胎。主要结局是新生儿的综合发病率:低血糖、高胆红素血症、肩难产和围产期死亡。次要结局包括复合成分、复合重症新生儿发病率、LGA、SGA、NICU入院和剖宫产。与预期治疗相比,泊松回归与稳健误差方差估计了36、37和38周分娩与结局之间的关联。结果:843例孕妇符合入选标准:1型糖尿病235例(28%),2型糖尿病602例(71%)。总的来说,146例(17%)在36周分娩,283例(34%)在37周分娩,217例(26%)在38周分娩,197例(23%)在39周分娩。与预期分娩相比,36周分娩与较高的综合发病率(aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55)以及低血糖、高胆红素血症、SGA和NICU入院相关。在37周和38周时,分娩组和预期治疗组的综合发病率没有显著差异。然而,与预期分娩相比,37周分娩与高胆红素血症的几率更高。在37周或38周分娩与预期治疗之间没有其他结果差异。糖尿病类型之间的关联很少。结论:基于这些结果和支持文献,除非必要,应避免36周择期分娩。虽然有关37周分娩的数据尚无定论,但对于妊娠糖尿病孕妇,应进一步评估38周分娩。需要在大型当代队列或随机试验中进行证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal timing of delivery in pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus.

Introduction: SMFM and ACOG recommend delivery of gravidae with pregestational diabetes at 36-39 6/7 weeks based on glycemic control and vascular complications. The optimal gestational age within this wide range is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of adverse outcomes with delivery versus expectant management at increasing gestational ages.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of gravidae with pregestational diabetes who delivered a non-anomalous singleton at 36 weeks (2012-2022). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity: hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included composite components, composite severe neonatal morbidity, LGA, SGA, NICU admission and cesarean. Poisson regression with robust error variance estimated the association between delivery at 36, 37, and 38 weeks and outcomes, compared with expectant management.

Results: 843 gravidae met inclusion criteria: 235 (28%) type 1 diabetes and 602 (71%) type 2 diabetes. Overall, 146 (17%) delivered at 36 weeks, 283 (34%) at 37 weeks, 217 (26%) at 38 weeks, and 197 (23%) at 39 weeks. Compared with expectant management, delivery at 36 weeks was associated with higher odds of composite morbidity (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55) as well as hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, SGA and NICU admission. At 37 and 38 weeks, there was no significant difference in composite morbidity among those delivered versus expectantly managed. However, delivery at 37 weeks was associated with higher odds of hyperbilirubinemia, compared with expectant management. No other outcomes differed between with delivery versus expectant management at 37 or 38 weeks. Few associations differed by diabetes type.

Conclusion: Based on these results and supporting literature, elective delivery at 36 weeks should be avoided unless necessary. Although the data are inconclusive regarding delivery at 37 weeks, delivery at 38 weeks should be evaluated further for gravidae with pregestational diabetes. Confirmation in a large, contemporary cohort or a randomized trial are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信