节段性椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的机械轴向不稳定性:郁金香螺钉与双锁定杯内固定的回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Aron Frantzén, Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Matti Ahonen, Ilkka Helenius
{"title":"节段性椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的机械轴向不稳定性:郁金香螺钉与双锁定杯内固定的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Aron Frantzén, Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Matti Ahonen, Ilkka Helenius","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.44038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The effects of axial instability in the rod-screw interface resulting in axial slippage between screws and rods are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence of axial slip and loss of correction by comparing tulip screw versus dual locking cup in spinal instrumentations of patients treated with posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We also aimed to assess whether axial slip would affect health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study consists of 194 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS during 2012-2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. There were 98 patients treated with segmental tulip pedicle screw instrumentation and 96 patients with segmental dual locking cup constructs. Axial slip was defined as ≥ 2 mm and was assessed by measuring the rod exceeding the last pedicle screw and the distance between the 2 lowest screws on the same rod. Loss of correction was assessed by comparing postoperative and 2-year radiographic measurements. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the SRS-24 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Axial slip occurred only between the lowest instrumented vertebra and the vertebra above it on the convex side of the deformity. At 2 years of follow-up, axial slippage of 2 mm or more was observed more often in the dual locking group, which was observed in 24 (25%) patients in the dual locking cup group and 11 (11%) patients in the tulip group (risk ratio [RR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.4). Minimum of 10° loss of major curve correction was found in 1 (1%) patient in the tulip group and 9 (9%) patients in the dual locking group (RR 9.1, CI 1.2-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Axial slip was significantly less frequent in the tulip group than in the dual locking cup group. This suggests that tulip screw instrumentation may offer superior mechanical stability in posterior spinal fusion for AIS. Axial slip was not associated with health-related quality of life outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"540-546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical axial instability of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study of tulip screw versus dual locking cup instrumentation.\",\"authors\":\"Aron Frantzén, Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Matti Ahonen, Ilkka Helenius\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.44038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The effects of axial instability in the rod-screw interface resulting in axial slippage between screws and rods are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence of axial slip and loss of correction by comparing tulip screw versus dual locking cup in spinal instrumentations of patients treated with posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We also aimed to assess whether axial slip would affect health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study consists of 194 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS during 2012-2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. There were 98 patients treated with segmental tulip pedicle screw instrumentation and 96 patients with segmental dual locking cup constructs. Axial slip was defined as ≥ 2 mm and was assessed by measuring the rod exceeding the last pedicle screw and the distance between the 2 lowest screws on the same rod. Loss of correction was assessed by comparing postoperative and 2-year radiographic measurements. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the SRS-24 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Axial slip occurred only between the lowest instrumented vertebra and the vertebra above it on the convex side of the deformity. At 2 years of follow-up, axial slippage of 2 mm or more was observed more often in the dual locking group, which was observed in 24 (25%) patients in the dual locking cup group and 11 (11%) patients in the tulip group (risk ratio [RR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.4). Minimum of 10° loss of major curve correction was found in 1 (1%) patient in the tulip group and 9 (9%) patients in the dual locking group (RR 9.1, CI 1.2-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Axial slip was significantly less frequent in the tulip group than in the dual locking cup group. This suggests that tulip screw instrumentation may offer superior mechanical stability in posterior spinal fusion for AIS. Axial slip was not associated with health-related quality of life outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"540-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:杆-螺杆界面轴向不稳定性导致的螺杆间轴向滑移的影响在很大程度上是未知的。我们的目的是通过比较郁金香螺钉和双锁定杯在后路脊柱融合术治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的脊柱内固定中轴向滑移和矫正损失的发生率。我们还旨在评估轴向滑移是否会影响健康相关的生活质量。方法:本研究包括2012-2022年期间接受AIS后路脊柱融合术的194例患者。所有患者至少随访2年。98例患者采用节段郁金香椎弓根螺钉内固定,96例患者采用节段双锁杯结构。轴向滑移定义为≥2mm,并通过测量超过最后一根椎弓根螺钉的杆和同一杆上最低两根螺钉之间的距离来评估。通过比较术后和2年的x线测量来评估矫正损失。使用SRS-24问卷评估健康相关生活质量。结果:轴向滑移仅发生在最低的固定椎体和其上的畸形凸侧椎体之间。随访2年,双锁杯组更常观察到2mm及以上的轴向滑移,双锁杯组有24例(25%)患者出现轴向滑移,郁金香组有11例(11%)患者出现轴向滑移(风险比[RR] 2.2, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.2-4.4)。在郁金香组中有1例(1%)患者和双锁定组中有9例(9%)患者出现了至少10°的主曲线矫正损失(RR为9.1,CI为1.2-100)。结论:郁金香组的轴向滑移发生率明显低于双锁杯组。这表明郁金香螺钉内固定在AIS后路脊柱融合术中具有优越的机械稳定性。轴向滑移与健康相关的生活质量结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical axial instability of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study of tulip screw versus dual locking cup instrumentation.

Background and purpose:  The effects of axial instability in the rod-screw interface resulting in axial slippage between screws and rods are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence of axial slip and loss of correction by comparing tulip screw versus dual locking cup in spinal instrumentations of patients treated with posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We also aimed to assess whether axial slip would affect health-related quality of life.

Methods:  This study consists of 194 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS during 2012-2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. There were 98 patients treated with segmental tulip pedicle screw instrumentation and 96 patients with segmental dual locking cup constructs. Axial slip was defined as ≥ 2 mm and was assessed by measuring the rod exceeding the last pedicle screw and the distance between the 2 lowest screws on the same rod. Loss of correction was assessed by comparing postoperative and 2-year radiographic measurements. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the SRS-24 questionnaire.

Results:  Axial slip occurred only between the lowest instrumented vertebra and the vertebra above it on the convex side of the deformity. At 2 years of follow-up, axial slippage of 2 mm or more was observed more often in the dual locking group, which was observed in 24 (25%) patients in the dual locking cup group and 11 (11%) patients in the tulip group (risk ratio [RR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.4). Minimum of 10° loss of major curve correction was found in 1 (1%) patient in the tulip group and 9 (9%) patients in the dual locking group (RR 9.1, CI 1.2-100).

Conclusion:  Axial slip was significantly less frequent in the tulip group than in the dual locking cup group. This suggests that tulip screw instrumentation may offer superior mechanical stability in posterior spinal fusion for AIS. Axial slip was not associated with health-related quality of life outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信