Chun Kit Chan , Christine Rajarigam , Patrick Jiang , Jacob Miratsky , Mustafa Demir , Melih Sener , Abhishek Singharoy
{"title":"实现蛋白质从序列到功能范式的待办事项清单","authors":"Chun Kit Chan , Christine Rajarigam , Patrick Jiang , Jacob Miratsky , Mustafa Demir , Melih Sener , Abhishek Singharoy","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It has been a longstanding dream of the structural biology and molecular biophysics communities to determine protein functions directly from the amino acid sequences. Most methods available today, however, are homology- or library-based and often undermine determining divergent functions from comparable sequences or vice versa. The sequence-to-function relationship is intrinsically dependent on the biophysical space of protein dynamics, which can be potentially exploited to annotate function. But, despite three decades of active research, the space of molecular dynamics data remains grossly underpopulated. By employing surveys of the existing literature, we highlight this gray area in the context of machine learning methods. Thereafter, we share examples that point toward learning biophysical representations—or signatures—and combining them with integrative models as means to robustly associate sequence with function. The aim is to avoid having to compute protein dynamics for an impossible thousand years to achieve data completeness and generalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 103119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A to-do list for realizing the sequence-to-function paradigm of proteins\",\"authors\":\"Chun Kit Chan , Christine Rajarigam , Patrick Jiang , Jacob Miratsky , Mustafa Demir , Melih Sener , Abhishek Singharoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It has been a longstanding dream of the structural biology and molecular biophysics communities to determine protein functions directly from the amino acid sequences. Most methods available today, however, are homology- or library-based and often undermine determining divergent functions from comparable sequences or vice versa. The sequence-to-function relationship is intrinsically dependent on the biophysical space of protein dynamics, which can be potentially exploited to annotate function. But, despite three decades of active research, the space of molecular dynamics data remains grossly underpopulated. By employing surveys of the existing literature, we highlight this gray area in the context of machine learning methods. Thereafter, we share examples that point toward learning biophysical representations—or signatures—and combining them with integrative models as means to robustly associate sequence with function. The aim is to avoid having to compute protein dynamics for an impossible thousand years to achieve data completeness and generalization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X2500137X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X2500137X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A to-do list for realizing the sequence-to-function paradigm of proteins
It has been a longstanding dream of the structural biology and molecular biophysics communities to determine protein functions directly from the amino acid sequences. Most methods available today, however, are homology- or library-based and often undermine determining divergent functions from comparable sequences or vice versa. The sequence-to-function relationship is intrinsically dependent on the biophysical space of protein dynamics, which can be potentially exploited to annotate function. But, despite three decades of active research, the space of molecular dynamics data remains grossly underpopulated. By employing surveys of the existing literature, we highlight this gray area in the context of machine learning methods. Thereafter, we share examples that point toward learning biophysical representations—or signatures—and combining them with integrative models as means to robustly associate sequence with function. The aim is to avoid having to compute protein dynamics for an impossible thousand years to achieve data completeness and generalization.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
[...]
The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.
-Folding and Binding-
Nucleic acids and their protein complexes-
Macromolecular Machines-
Theory and Simulation-
Sequences and Topology-
New constructs and expression of proteins-
Membranes-
Engineering and Design-
Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation-
Biophysical and molecular biological methods-
Multi-protein assemblies in signalling-
Catalysis and Regulation