评估欧盟汽车工业生命周期可持续性评估策略:对发展中国家的影响

Ritesh Deore , Shipra Pandey
{"title":"评估欧盟汽车工业生命周期可持续性评估策略:对发展中国家的影响","authors":"Ritesh Deore ,&nbsp;Shipra Pandey","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The automotive industry is pivotal in shaping sustainable practices due to its significant environmental, economic, and social impacts. This paper investigates Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) Strategies within the European Union (EU) automotive sector and their implications for developing countries. By reviewing the literature, we identified seven LCSA strategies and six key sustainability impact factors: environmental impact, economic feasibility, social benefits, resource efficiency, innovation potential, and regulatory compliance. We employed the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to evaluate and rank these strategies based on their effectiveness and applicability. The results indicate that while the EU’s advanced regulatory framework and technological capabilities facilitate the adoption of robust LCSA frameworks, developing countries face challenges such as limited infrastructure, financial constraints, and weaker regulatory mechanisms. However, the transfer of knowledge and technology from the EU to developing nations can bridge these gaps, fostering global sustainability in the automotive industry. This study underscores the necessity for tailored LCSA strategy that consider regional differences and encourages collaborative efforts to enhance sustainable practices worldwide. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers aiming to advance sustainability in the automotive sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"135 ","pages":"Pages 221-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Strategies in the EU Automotive Industry: Implications for Developing Countries\",\"authors\":\"Ritesh Deore ,&nbsp;Shipra Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The automotive industry is pivotal in shaping sustainable practices due to its significant environmental, economic, and social impacts. This paper investigates Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) Strategies within the European Union (EU) automotive sector and their implications for developing countries. By reviewing the literature, we identified seven LCSA strategies and six key sustainability impact factors: environmental impact, economic feasibility, social benefits, resource efficiency, innovation potential, and regulatory compliance. We employed the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to evaluate and rank these strategies based on their effectiveness and applicability. The results indicate that while the EU’s advanced regulatory framework and technological capabilities facilitate the adoption of robust LCSA frameworks, developing countries face challenges such as limited infrastructure, financial constraints, and weaker regulatory mechanisms. However, the transfer of knowledge and technology from the EU to developing nations can bridge these gaps, fostering global sustainability in the automotive industry. This study underscores the necessity for tailored LCSA strategy that consider regional differences and encourages collaborative efforts to enhance sustainable practices worldwide. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers aiming to advance sustainability in the automotive sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia CIRP\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 221-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia CIRP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125002641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125002641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其对环境、经济和社会的重大影响,汽车行业在塑造可持续实践方面发挥着关键作用。本文研究了欧盟(EU)汽车行业的生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)战略及其对发展中国家的影响。通过回顾文献,我们确定了7个LCSA战略和6个关键的可持续性影响因素:环境影响、经济可行性、社会效益、资源效率、创新潜力和法规遵从性。我们采用了TOPSIS (technical for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)分析方法,根据这些策略的有效性和适用性对其进行评价和排序。结果表明,尽管欧盟先进的监管框架和技术能力促进了健全的LCSA框架的采用,但发展中国家面临着基础设施有限、资金约束和监管机制薄弱等挑战。然而,从欧盟向发展中国家的知识和技术转移可以弥合这些差距,促进全球汽车工业的可持续性。这项研究强调了考虑区域差异的量身定制的LCSA战略的必要性,并鼓励合作努力,以加强全球的可持续实践。研究结果为旨在促进汽车行业可持续发展的政策制定者、行业利益相关者和研究人员提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Strategies in the EU Automotive Industry: Implications for Developing Countries
The automotive industry is pivotal in shaping sustainable practices due to its significant environmental, economic, and social impacts. This paper investigates Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) Strategies within the European Union (EU) automotive sector and their implications for developing countries. By reviewing the literature, we identified seven LCSA strategies and six key sustainability impact factors: environmental impact, economic feasibility, social benefits, resource efficiency, innovation potential, and regulatory compliance. We employed the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to evaluate and rank these strategies based on their effectiveness and applicability. The results indicate that while the EU’s advanced regulatory framework and technological capabilities facilitate the adoption of robust LCSA frameworks, developing countries face challenges such as limited infrastructure, financial constraints, and weaker regulatory mechanisms. However, the transfer of knowledge and technology from the EU to developing nations can bridge these gaps, fostering global sustainability in the automotive industry. This study underscores the necessity for tailored LCSA strategy that consider regional differences and encourages collaborative efforts to enhance sustainable practices worldwide. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers aiming to advance sustainability in the automotive sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信